In:Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual
Edited by Jef Verschueren and Jan-Ola Östman
[Handbook of Pragmatics M2] 2022
► pp. 91–111
Artificial intelligence
Published online: 3 October 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.m2.art1
https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.m2.art1
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 3.The physical symbol system hypothesis
- 4.Paradigms for the representation of knowledge
- 4.1State-space search
- 4.2Logic-based formalisms
- 4.3Semantic network formalisms and frames
- 4.4Rule-based formalisms
- 5.Linguistic symbol manipulation in semantics and pragmatics
- 5.1Semantics
- 5.2Knowledge and intentions
- 5.3Utterances in context
- 5.4Modeling the user
- 5.4.1User modeling and dialog systems
- 5.4.2Dimensions of user models
- 5.4.3Construction of a user model
- 5.4.4Instantiating the user model: Collecting evidence in dialog
- 5.5Generating discourse
- 6.Epilogue
Note References
References (127)
Allen, J. 1983a. Recognizing intentions from natural language utterances. In M. Brady & R. Berwick (eds.): 107–166.
Allen, J. & C. Perrault. 1980. Analyzing intention in utterances. Artificial Intelligence 15: 143–178.
Andriessen, J. & K. De Smedt & M. Zock. 1995. Computational models of discourse planning. In A. Dijkstra & K. De Smedt (eds.).
Bobrow, D. 1968. Natural language input for a computer problem-solving system. In M. Minsky (ed.) Semantic information processing: 146–226. MIT Press.
Bonarini, A. 1987. User modeling in person-machine conversation. Proceedings of COGNITIVA-87: 377–382.
Carberry, S. 1983. Tracking user goals in an information-seeking environment. Proceedings AAAI-83: 59–63.
1989. Plan recognition and its use in understanding dialog. In A. Kobsa & W. Wahlster (eds.): 133–162.
Cawsey, A. 1990a. A computational model of explanatory discourse. In P. Luff, N. Gilbert & D. Frohlich (eds.): 221–234.
Claassen, W. 1992. Generating referring expressions in a multimodal environment. In R. Dale, E. Hovy, D. Roesner & O. Stock (eds.): 247–262.
Cohen, P. & C. Perrault. 1979. Elements of a plan-based theory of speech acts. Cognitive Science 3: 177–212.
Daelemans, W. & K. De Smedt & G. Gazdar. 1992. Inheritance in natural language processing. Computational Linguistics 18: 205–218.
Dale, R. & E. Hovy & D. Roesner & O. Stock (eds.) 1992. Aspects of automated natural language generation. Springer.
Finin, T. & D. Drager. 1986. GUMS: A general user modeling system. Proceedings of the 6th Canadian Conference on Artificial Intelligence: 24–29.
Garnham, A. 1995. Computational models of discourse comprehension. In A. Dijkstra & K. De Smedt (eds.).
Green, B. & A. Wolf & C. Chomsky & K. Laughery. 1963. BASEBALL: An automatic question-answerer. In E. Feigenbaum & J. Feldman (eds.) Computers and thought: 207–216. McGraw-Hill.
Grosz, B. 1977. The representation and use of focus in a system for understanding dialogs. Proceedings IJCAI-77: 67–76.
Harnad, S. 1989. Minds, machines and Searle. Journal of Theoretical and Experimental Artificial Intelligence 1: 5–25.
Hayes, P. & S. Harnad & D. Perlis & N. Block. 1992. Virtual symposium on the virtual mind. Minds and Machines 2: 217–238.
Hovy, E. 1988a. Planning coherent multisentential text. Proceedings of the 26th ACL Conference: 163–169.
1988b. On the study of text planning and realization: Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Text Planning and Realization. 17–29.
1991. Approaches to the planning of coherent text. In C. Paris, W. Swartout & W. Mann (eds.): 83–102.
Kaplan, S. 1982. Cooperative responses from a portable natural language query system. Artificial Intelligence 19: 165–188.
Kass, R. & T. Finin. 1988. Modeling the user in natural language systems. Computational Linguistics 14: 5–22.
Kempen, G. 1989. Language generation systems. In I. Bátori, W. Lenders & W. Putschke (eds.) Computational Linguistics: 471–480. de Gruyter.
Kobsa, A. 1989. A taxonomy of beliefs and goals for user models in dialog systems. In A. Kobsa & W. Wahlster (eds.): 52–68.
Kobsa, A. & J. Allgayer & C. Reddig & N. Reithinger & D. Schmauks & K. Harbiush & W. Wahlster. 1986. Combining deictic gestures and natural language for referent identification. Proceedings of COLING-86: 356–361.
Lascarides, A. & J. Oberlander. 1992. Abducing temporal discourse. In R. Dale, E. Hovy, D. Roesner & O. Stock (eds.): 176–182.
Litman, D. 1986. Linguistic coherence. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: 215–223.
Mccoy, K. 1989. Highlighting a user model to respond to misconceptions. In A. Kobsa & W. Wahlster (eds.): 233–254.
Mckeown, K. R. 1985a. Discourse strategies and focus constraints to generate natural language text. Artificial Intelligence 27: 1–41.
Mckeown, K. R. & M. Elhadad & Y. Fukumoto & J. Lim & C. Lombardi & J. Robin & F. Smadja. 1990. Natural language generation in COMET. In R. Dale, C. Mellish & M. Zock (eds.): 103–139.
Minsky, M. 1975. A framework for representing knowledge. In P. Winston (ed.) The psychology of computer vision: 211–277. McGraw-Hill.
Moore, J. D. & W. Swartout. 1991. A reactive approach to explanation. In C. L. Paris, W. Swartout & W. Mann (eds.): 3–48.
Murre, J. & R. Goebel. 1995. Computational modelling in connectionism. In A. Dijkstra & K. De Smedt (eds.).
Newell, A. & P. S. Rosenbloom & J. E. Laird. 1989. Symbolic architectures for cognition. In M. I. Posner (ed.) Cognitive science: 93–131. Bradford/MIT Press.
Norman, D. A. 1986. Cognitive engineering. In D. A. Norman & S. Draper (eds.) User centered system design: 31–61. Erlbaum.
Paris, C. 1988. Tailoring object descriptions to the user’s level of expertise. Computational Linguistics 14: 64–78.
Paris, C. & K. Mckeown. 1987. Discourse strategies for describing complex physical objects. In G. Kempen (ed.): 97–115.
Paris, C. & W. Swartout & W. Mann (eds.) 1991. Natural language generation in artificial intelligence and computational linguistics. Kluwer.
Pollack, M. E. 1986. A model of plan inference that distinguishes between the beliefs of actors and observers. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics: 207–214.
Quilici, A. 1989. Detecting and responding to plan-oriented misconceptions. In A. Kobsa & W. Wahlster (eds.): 108–132.
Quillian, R. 1968. Semantic memory. In M. Minsky (ed.) Semantic information processing: 227–270. MIT Press.
Reiter, E. 1990. Generating descriptions that exploit a user’s domain knowledge. In R. Dale, C. Mellish & M. Zock (eds.): 257–285.
Robinson, A. 1981. Determining verb phrase referents in dialogs. American Journal of Computational Linguistics 7: 1–18.
Scott, D. & C. De Souza. 1990. Getting the message across in RST-based text generation. In R. Dale, C. Mellish & M. Zock (eds.): 47–73.
1985. Plan parsing for intended response recognition of speaker’s plan in discourse. Computational Intelligence 1: 1–10.
Simmons, R. & S. Klein & K. Mcconlogue. 1964. Indexing and dependency logic for answering English questions. American Documentation 15: 196–202.
Sowa, J. F. 1991. Toward the expressive power of natural language. In J. F. Sowa (ed.) Principles of semantic networks: 157–190. Morgan Kaufmann.
Thompson, H. 1977. Strategy and tactics in language production. In W. Beach, S. Fox & S. Philosoph (eds.) Papers from the Thirteenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society: 651–668.
Turing, A. 1964. Computing machinery and intelligence. In A. Andersen (ed.) Minds and machines: 4–30. Prentice Hall.
Wahlster, W. & A. Kobsa. 1989. User models in dialog systems. In A. Kobsa & W. Wahlster (eds.): 4–33.
Weizenbaum, J. 1966. ELIZA: a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. CACM 9: 36–45.
Wilensky, R. & D. Chin & M. Luria & J. Martin & J. Mayfield & D. Wu. 1988. The Berkeley UNIX Consultant Project. Computational Linguistics 14: 35–84.
Woods, W. 1970. Transition network grammars for natural language analysis. Communications of the ACM 13: 591–606.
