On The Origin of the Term ‘Indo-Germanic’

Shapiro, Fred R.

doi:10.1075/hl.8.1.18sha

In:Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 8:1 (1981) ► pp.165–170

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download PDF

Miscellaneous

On The Origin of the Term ‘Indo-Germanic’

Fred R. Shapiro | Roslyn, N.Y.

Published online: 1 January 1981

https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.8.1.18sha

References (11)

References

Buck, Darling, (1866–1955). 1904. “‘Indo-European’ or ‘Indo-Germanic’?” ClassR 181.399–401.

Jones, William. 1788. “The Third Anniversary Discourse”. Asiatick Researches 11.415–31.

Klaproth, Julius. 1810. Archiv für asiatische Litteratur, Geschichte und Sprachkunde. St. Petersburg: Acad.-Verlag.

. 1823. Asia Polyglotta. Paris: A. Schubart. (2nd ed., Paris: Heidelhoff & Campe, 1831.)

Malte-Brun, Conrad. 1810. Précis de la géographie universelle. Tome II1. Paris: Fr. Buisson.

. 1822. Universal Geography. Vol. I1. Edinburgh: Adam Black.

Meyer, Gustav. 1893. “Von wem stammt die Bezeichnung Indogermanen?”. IF 21.125–30.

Norman, Frederick. 1929. “‘Indo-European’ and ‘Indo-Germanic’”. MLR 241.313–21.

Parsons, James. 1767. Remains of Japhet: Being historical enquiries into the affinity and origin of the European languages. London: Author.

Schlegel, Friedrich. 1819. Review of J. G. Rhode, Ueber den Anfang unserer Geschichte (Breslau: W. A. Holäufer, 1819). Wiener Jahrbücher der Literatur 81.413–68. (Cited after F. Schlegel, Studien zur Philosophie und Theologie ed. by Ernst Behler & Ursula Struc-Oppenberg [= Kritische Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe, 8]. 474–528. Munich-Paderborn-Vienna: F. Schöningh; Zurich: Thomas, 1975.)

Young, Thomas. 1813. Review of Johann Christoph Adelung, Mithridates oder allgemeine Sprachenkunde. Quarterly Review 101.250–92.

Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Solleveld, Floris

2020. Klaproth, Balbi and the language atlas. In History of Linguistics 2017 [Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 127], ► pp. 81 ff.

Bourquin, Jacques

1999. Proudhon’s “Recherches sur les Categories Grammaticales”. In The Prix Volney: Its History and Significance for the Development of Linguistic Research [Prix Volney Essay Series, 1], ► pp. 812 ff.

Koerner, Konrad

1997. Linguistics vs philology: Self-definition of a field or rhetorical stance?. Language Sciences 19:2 ► pp. 167 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.