Article published In: Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 40:3 (2013) ► pp.433–476
A little-known aspect of Leonard Bloomfield’s linguistics
The story of Let’s Read (1961)
Published online: 3 September 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.40.3.05bar
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.40.3.05bar
Summary
Leonard Bloomfield’s (1887–1949) contribution to the literature and theory of teaching reading is not widely known. This paper recounts the history of that contribution, published as Let’s Read: A linguistic approach in 1961, well after his death. Clarence L. Barnhart (1900–1993), the lexicographer, had encouraged Bloomfield to write a complete, finished manuscript of his phonemic approach to teaching reading and expended considerable time searching for a publisher. Bloomfield and Barnhart also sought classroom experimentation of Bloomfield’s materials before publication, which by and large verified his ideas, as did later experiments. Critical reception of Let’s Read, which rejected familiar reading pedagogy, was not warmly welcoming, especially among reading professionals, while linguists like the Romanist Yakov Malkiel (1914–1998) and the structuralist Henry Lee Smith (1913–1972) offered more positive assessments.
Résumé
La contribution de Leonard Bloomfield (1887–1949) à la littérature et à la théorie de l’apprentissage de la lecture n’est pas très connue. Cet article raconte l’histoire de cette contribution, publiée en 1961, bien après sa mort, sous le titre de Let’s Read: A linguistic approach. Le lexicographe Clarence L. Barnhart (1900–1993) avait encouragé Bloomfield à écrire un manuscrit complet et achevé sur son approche phonologique de l’apprentissage de la lecture et consacra beaucoup de temps à trouver un éditeur. Bloomfield et Barnhart cherchèrent également à expérimenter en classe le matériel de Bloomfield avant sa publication, ce qui vérifia globalement ses idées, comme le firent des expériences ultérieures. Let’s Read, qui rejetait la pédagogie traditionnelle de la lecture, ne reçut pas un accueil très chaleureux de la part de la critique, en particulier parmi les professionnels de la lecture. Mais des linguistes, comme le romaniste Yakov Malkiel (1914–1998) et le structuraliste Henry Lee Smith (1913–1972), émirent des jugements plus positifs.
Zusammenfassung
Über den Beitrag von Leonard Bloomfield (1887–1949) zur Literatur und zu seiner Theorie des Leseerwerbs ist ziemlich wenig bekannt. Der vorliegende Beitrag berichtet über das allmähliche Konkretisierung seiner Anschauungen auf diesem Gebiet, welche aber erst 1961, also deutlich nach seinem Tode, unter dem Titel Let’s Read: A linguistic approach publiziert wurden. Der Lexikograph Clarence L. Barnhart (1900–1993) hatte Bloomfield ermuntert, ein vollständiges, druckfertiges Manuskript über seinen phonologischen Ansatz zum Leseerwerb zu verfassen und hatte zudem viel Zeit darauf verwendet, hierfür einen Verleger zu finden. Bloomfield und Barnhart versuchten ebenfalls, vor der Publikation der Schrift die Materialien im Unterricht zu testen, die weitgehend die Vorgaben bestätigten. Let’s Read, welches gängige didaktische Ansätze zum Leseerwerb verwirft, wurde nicht mit Begeisterung aufgenommen, namentlich von den Fachleuten im engeren Sinne. Aber Sprachwissenschaftler wie der Romanist Yakov Malkiel (1914–1998) und der Strukturalist Henry Lee Smith (1913–1972) äußerten sich deutlich positiver hierzu.
References (27)
Bateman, Barbara & Janis Wetherell. 1964. “A Critique of Bloomfield’s Linguistic Approach to the Teaching of Reading”. The Reading Teacher 18:2.98–104.
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1984 [1933]. Language. Reprint with a new foreword by C[harles] F[rancis] Hockett. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
Bloomfield, Leonard & Clarence L. Barnhart. 1961. Let’s Read: A linguistic approach. Detroit, Mich.: Wayne State Press. (=
LR 1961)
. 2010. Let’s Read: A linguistic approach. 2nd ed., revised and updated by Cynthia, A. & Robert K. Barnhart. Detroit, Mich.: Wayne State Press. (=
LR 2010)
Bloomfield, Leonard, Clarence L. Barnhart, Robert K. Barnhart. 1993 [1963]. Let’s Read 1–9 Revised Edition. Revised by Cynthia A. Barnhart. Cambridge, Mass.: Educators Publishing Service.
Clymer, Theodore. 1964. “An Asthmatic Mouse in a Ragweed Maze: A moderate’s look at reading instruction”. Teachers College Record 651.455–460.
Devine, Thomas G. 1966. “Linguistic Research and the Teaching of Reading”. Journal of Reading 9:4.273–277.
Fought, John G. 1999. “Leonard Bloomfield’s Linguistic Legacy: Later uses of some technical features”. Historiographia Linguistica 26:3.313–332.
Fries, Charles C[arpenter]. 1963 [1962]. Linguistics and Reading. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Goodman, Kenneth S. & Frank Smith. 1971. “On the Psycholinguistc Method of Teaching Reading”. The Elementary School Journal 71:4.177–181.
Hall, Robert A[nderson], Jr., with the assistance of Konrad Koerner, ed. 1987. Leonard Bloomfield: Essays on his Life and Work. (=
Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 47.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Hart, Betty & Todd R. Risley. 2002 [1995]. Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience of Young American Children. Baltimore, Md.: Paul H. Brookes.
Hockett, Charles F. 1999. “Leonard Bloomfield After Fifty Years”. Historiographia Linguistica 26:3.295–311.
Horton, Marguerite F. L. 1966, 1967. “Linguistics and Reading”. Part I and II. McGill Journal of Education 1:2.107–115 and 2:1.54–60.
Mathews, Mitford M. 1976 [1966]. Teaching to Read Historically Considered. Phoenix edition. 2nd ed. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NAAL). 2005. Sponsored by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). Washington, D.C. Online: [URL]. Accessed on 16 Apr. 2013.
National Report Card Reading 2011. National Assessment of Education Progress at Grades 4 & 8 (NAEP). Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics, Institution of Education Services, U.S. Department of Education. Online: [URL]. Accessed on 16 Apr. 2013.
Richgels, Donald J. 2004. “Theory and Research into Practice: Paying Attention to Language”. Reading Research Quarterly 39:4.470–477.
Shannon, Margaret R. 1963. Review of Bloomfield & Barnhart (1961). Teachers College Record 65:1.93–94.
Sheldon, William D., Nancy Nicols & Donald R. Lashinger. 1967. Comparison of Three Methods of Teaching Reading in the Second Grade. (=
Cooperative Research Project # 3231.) Washington, D.C.: Office of Education, U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
Smith, Henry Lee, Jr. 1963. “Bloomfield and Barnhart”. Language 39:1.67–78. [Review of Bloomfield & Barnhart (1961).]
Tabachnick, B. Robert. 1962. “A Linguist Looks at Reading: Leonard Bloomfield and the Phonemic Criterion”. Elementary English 39:6.545–548, 561.
Velleman, Barry L. 2008. “The Scientific Linguist Goes to War: The United States A.S.T. Program in Foreign Languages”. Historiographia Linguistica 35:3.385–416.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
da Conceição, Djenane Brasil
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
