Article published In: Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 40:3 (2013) ► pp.377–408
Otto Jespersen and “The Woman”, then and now
Published online: 3 September 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.40.3.03tho
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.40.3.03tho
Summary
Danish linguist Otto Jespersen’s (1860–1943) Language, its Nature, Development, and Origin was published more than 90 years ago, in 1922. This article focuses on Jespersen’s often-cited Chapter 13, entitled “The Woman”, a text that has served since the 1970s as a touchstone for feminist narratives of the history of discussion of language and gender. The author of the present article shows that modern treatment of the chapter sometimes misconstrues Jespersen in casting him into the role of mouthpiece for ideas about women and language that contemporary scholars have discredited. She suggests instead that “The Woman” deserves a new reading, which neither apologizes for Jespersen’s views, nor diminishes his importance to the history of feminist linguistics, but rather recognizes the intricacies of this text and seeks to better understand its position in relation to present-day scholarship on language and gender.
Résumé
Language, its Nature, Development, and Origin du linguiste danois Otto Jespersen (1860–1943) a été publié il y a plus de 90 ans, en 1922. Cet article porte sur le chapitre 13 souvent cité de Jespersen, intitulé “The Woman” (“La femme”), un texte qui sert depuis les années 1970 de pierre de touche pour les récits féministes de l’histoire de la discussion de la langue et du genre. L’auteur du présent article démontre que le traitement moderne de ce chapitre interprète parfois Jespersen de façon incorrecte, en lui assignant le rôle de porte-parole pour des idées concernant la femme et la langue qui ont été discréditées par les linguistes contemporains. Par contre, l’auteur suggère que “La femme” mérite une nouvelle lecture qui n’excuse ni les opinions de Jespersen, ni ne diminue son importance dans l’histoire de la linguistique féministe, mais plutôt reconnaît la complexité de ce texte et cherche à mieux comprendre sa position par rapport avec l’érudition actuelle sur la langue et le genre.
Zusammenfassung
1922, also vor mehr als 90 Jahren, erschien Language, its Nature, Development, and Origin des dänischen Sprachwissenschaftlers Otto Jespersen (1860–1943). Im vorliegenden Aufsatz handelt es sich um das oft zitierte Kapitel 13 des Buches, das den Titel “The Woman” (“Die Frau”) trägt und das seit den 70er Jahren als Bezugspunkt der Kritik in der feministischen Diskussion über Sprache und Geschlecht gilt. Dabei geht es der Autorin darum zu zeigen, dass in der neueren Auseinandersetzung mit diesem Kapitel Jespersen bisweilen deswegen missverstanden wird, weil man Jespersen in die Rolle eines Sprachrohrs für gewisse von den zeitgenössischen Wissenschaftlern bereits diskreditierte Vorstellungen über Frauen und Sprache versetzt hat. Demgegenüber wird hier der Versuch unternommen, eine neue Auslegung des Kapitels “Die Frau” zu liefern, und zwar eine, die weder eine Apologie für Jespersens Ansichten bietet noch dessen Bedeutung für die Geschichte der feministischen Linguistik schmälert. Vielmehr wird eine Interpretation angestrebt, die die Vielschichtigkeit des Textes anerkennt und die ein genaueres Verständnis des Platzes dieses Texts in Bezug auf die heutige Forschung über Sprache und Geschlechterrollen ermöglicht.
References (85)
Awan, Safeer & Muhammad Sheeraz. 2011. “Gender-Oriented Code-Switching: A case-study of English language teachers at Pakistani universities”. International Journal of Academic Research 31.410–415.
Bergvall, Victoria L. 1999. “Toward a Comprehensive Theory of Language and Gender”. Language in Society 281.273–293.
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1922. Review of Jespersen (1922). The American Journal of Philology 431.370–373.
. 1983 [1914]. An Introduction to the Study of Language New ed. with introduction by Joseph F. Kess. (=
Classics in Psycholinguistics, 3.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Bradley, Patricia Hayes. 1981. “The Folk-Linguistics of Women’s Speech: An empirical investigation”. Communication Monographs 481.73–90.
Bucholtz, Mary & Kira Hall. 1995. “Introduction”. Gender Articulated ed. by Kira Hall & Mary Bucholtz, 1–22. New York: Routledge.
Coates, Jennifer. 1986. Women, Men and Language. London: Longman. (2nd ed., 1993; 3rd ed. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2004).
Collinson, W[illiam] E[dward]. 1923. Review of Jespersen (1922). The Modern Language Review 181.91–96.
De Reul, Paul. 1922. Review of Jespersen (1922). Revue belge de philologie et d’histoire 11.731–738.
Falk, Julia. 1992. “Otto Jespersen, Leonard Bloomfield, and American Structural Linguistics”. Language 681.465–491.
Fögen, Thorsten. 2004. “Gender-Specific Communication in Graeco-Roman Antiquity”. Historiographia Linguistica 211.199–276.
Frank, Francine Wattman. 1978. “Women’s Language in America: Myth and reality”. Women’s Language and Style ed. by Douglass Butturff & Edmund L. Epstein, 47–61. Akron, Ohio: Department of English, University of Akron.
2003. “Epilogue: Reflections on language and gender research”. Holmes & Meyerhoff, eds. 2003.699–721.
Furfey, Paul Hanley. 1944. “Men’s and Women’s Language”. The American Catholic Sociological Review 51.218–223.
Hall, Kira. 2003. “Exceptional Speakers: Contested and problematized gender identities”. Holmes & Meyerhoff, eds. 2003.353–380.
Henley, Nancy & Cheris Kramarae. 1991. “Gender, Power, and Miscommunication”. Miscommunication and Problematic Talk ed. by Nikolas Coupland, Howard Giles & John M. Wiemann, 18–43. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.
Hill, Alette Olin. 1986. Mother Tongue, Father Time: A decade of linguistic revolt. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press.
Holmes, Janet & Miriam Meyerhoff, eds. 2003. The Handbook of Language and Gender. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
Howatt, A. P. R. 1984. A History of English Language Teaching. (2nd ed. with H[enry] G. Widdowson. 2004.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jespersen, Otto. 1917. Review of Cours de linguistique générale de F. de Saussure ed. by Charles Bally & Albert Sechehaye, and assisted by Albert Riedlinger (Lausanne & Paris: Payot, 1916). Nordisk Tidsskrift for Filologi 61.37–41.
. 1907. “Mands sprog og kvindes tale [Man’s language and women’s speech]”. Gads Danske Magasin 1906/1907 ed. by C. Gulman & L. Moltsen, 581–592. Copenhagen: G.E.C. Gad.
. 1909–1949. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Part I: Sounds and Spellings, 1909; Part II: Syntax Vol. 11, 1914; Part III, Syntax Vol. 21, 1927; Part IV, Syntax: Time and Tense Vol. 31, 1931, Heidelberg: Carl Winter; Part V, Syntax Vol. 41, 1940; Part VI, Morphology (with the assistance of Paul Christophersen, Niels Haislund & Knud Schibsbye), 1942; Part VII, Syntax (completed and published by Niels Haislund), Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1949.
. 1922. Language, Its Nature, Development and Origin. London: George Allen & Unwin. (Repr., New York: W. W. Norton, 1964).
. 1941. Sproget: Barnet, Kvinden, Slaegten [Language: Child, woman, family]. Copenhagen: Gyldendalske Boghandel.
. 1995 [1938]. A Linguist’s Life: An English translation of Otto Jespersen’s autobiography with notes, photos and a bibliography ed. by Arne Juul, Hans F. Nielsen & Jørgen Erik Nielsen. Odense: Odense University Press.
Johnson, Fern L. 1983. “Political and Pedagogical Implications of Attitudes Towards Women’s Language”. Communication Quarterly 311.133–138.
Joseph, John E. 1992. “Paul Hanly Furfey and the Origins of American Sociolinguistics”. Historiographia Linguistica 191.111–143.
Juul, Arne & Hans F. Nielsen, eds. 1989. Otto Jespersen: Facets of his life and work. (=
Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 52.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Lakoff, Robin Tolmach. 2004 [1975]. Language and Women’s Place. New York: Harper & Row. (Rev. and expanded ed. published as Language and Women’s Place: Text and commentaries. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.)
Mahony, Patrick. 1983. “Women’s Discourse and Literature – The question of nature and culture”. Contemporary Psychoanalysis 191.444–459.
McConnell-Ginet, Sally. 1975. “Our Father Tongue: Essays in linguistic politics”. Diacritics 51.44–50.
Mills, Sara & Louise Mullany. 2011. Language, Gender and Feminism: Theory, methodology and practice. London: Routledge.
Müller, F[riedrich] Max. 1875 [1863]. Lectures on the Science of Language. Second Series. New York: Scribner, Armstrong & Co. [Originally: Longmans, Green & Co.]
Müller, F. Max. 1876. Chips from a German Workshop. Vol. IV1. London: Longmans, Green & Co.; New York: Charles Scribner.
Nielsen, Hans F. 1989. “On Otto Jespersen’s View of Language Evolution”. Juul & Nielsen, eds. 1989.61–78.
Nordenstam, Kerstin. 2008. Genusperspektiv på sprak [Gender perspectives on language]. Stockholm: Högskoleverket.
Ostermann, Ana Christina. 2003. “Communities of Practice at Work: Gender, facework and power of habitus at an all-female police station and a feminist crisis intervention center in Brazil”. Discourse and Society 141.473–505.
Pan, Qi. 2011. “On the Features of Female Language in English”. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 81.1015–1018.
Paul, Hermann. 1889 [2
1886]. Principles of the History of Language. Transl. by Herbert Augustus Strong. London: Sonnenschein & Co.; New York: Macmillan.
Prokosch, Eduard. 1923. Review of Jespersen (1922). The Journal of English and Germanic Philology 221.298–301.
Quirk, Randoph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London & New York: Longman.
Rischel, Jørgen. 1989. “Otto Jespersen’s Contribution to Danish and General Phonetics”. Juul & Nielsen, eds. 19891.43–60.
Santaemilia, José. 2002. “Towards a Pragmatics of Gendered Conversation: A few general considerations”. Quaderns de Filologia: Estudis lingüístics 71.93–103.
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1916. Cours de linguistique générale ed. by Charles Bally & Albert Sechehaye, assisted by Albert Riedlinger. Lausanne & Paris: Payot.
Sayce, Archibald H. 1875 [1
1874]. The Principles of Comparative Philology/ 2nd ed. London: Trübner & Co.
Thorne, Barrie & Nancy Henley, eds. 1975. Language and Sex: Difference and dominance. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Ortega-Robles, Carmen & Encarnación Hidalgo-Tenorio
Stanlaw, James
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
