Cover not available

Review article published In: Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 4:3 (1977) ► pp.319382

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (76)
Literaturverweise
Allen, W. Sidney. 1955. “Zero and Pānini”. IL 161.106–13.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 1969. An Introduction to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. London: Hutchinson Univ. Library.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Apel, Karl Otto. 1970a. “Sprache als Thema und Medium der transzendentalen Reflexion”. Man and World 31.323–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1970b. “From Kant to Peirce: The Semiotic Transformation of Transcendental Logic”. Proceedings of the 3rd International Kant Congress, Rochester 1970, 90–104. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1972.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1972. “Die Kommunikationsgemeinschaft als transzendentale Voraussetzung der Sozialwissenschaften”. Neue Hefte für Philosophie 2/3.1–40. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1974. “Zur Idee einer transzendentalen Sprachpragmatik”. Aspekte und Probleme der Sprachphilosophie hrg. von Josef Simon. Freiburg & München: Alber.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. ed. 1975. Sprachpragmatik und Philosophie. Frankfurt/M.: Suhr-kamp.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arens, Hans. 1955. Sprachwissenschaft: Der Gang ihrer Entwicklung von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart. Freiburg & München: Alber.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1969. Sprachwissenschaft. 21. durchgesehene und stark erweiterte Aufl. Ibid.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Austin, John L. 1961 [1940]. “The Meaning of a Word”. Philosophical Papers ed. by J. O. Urmson/G. J. Warnock. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baumann, Hans-Heinrich. 1971. “Die generative Grammatik und Wilhelm von Humboldt”. Poetica 41.1–12.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bierich, Marcus. 1951. Freges Lehre von dem Sinn und der Bedeutung der Urteile und Russells Kritik an dieser Lehre. Masch.schr. Diss. Hamburg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bierwisch, Manfred. 1970. “Semantics”. New Horizons in Linguistics ed. by John Lyons, 166–84. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Black, Max. 1964. A Companion to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bocheński, J. M. 1970. Formale Logik. 31. Aufl. Freiburg & München: Alber. (1. Aufl., 1956.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bonomi, Andrea & G. Usberti. 1971. Sintassi e semantica nella grammatica trasformazionale. Milano: Il Saggiatore.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brekle, Herbert E. 1971. “Die Idee einer generativen Grammatik in Leib-nizens Fragmenten zur Logik”. Studia Leibnitiana 31.141–49.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brough, John. 1951. “Theories of General Linguistics in the Sanskrit Grammarians”. TPhS 1951.27–46. (Abdr. in J. F. Staal, ed., A Reader on the Sanskrit Grammarians, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press 1972.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bugarski, Ranko. 1972. Jezik i lingvistika. Beograd: Nolit.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bursill-Hall, Geoffrey L. 1971. Speculative Grammars of the Middle Ages. The Hague: Mouton– Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1975. “The Middle Ages”. Current Trends in Linguistics ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, vol. 131.179–230. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1966. Cartesian Linguistics: A chapter in the history of rationalist thought. New York & London: Harper & Row.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coseriu, Eugenio. 1969. Die Geschichte der Sprachphilosophie von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart: Eine Übersicht. Teil I: Von der Antike bis Leibniz. Vorlesung gehalten im WS 1968/69 an der Universität Tübingen. Autorisierte Nachschrift besorgt von Gunter Narr u. Rudolf Windisch. Tübingen: Romanisches Seminar.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1970. “Semantik, innere Sprachform und Tiefenstruktur”. FoLi 41.53–63.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dinneen, Francis P. 1974. Rez. von Jan Pinborg, Logik und Semantik im Mittelalter (1972). HL 1:2.221–49.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dummett, H. Michael 1973. Frege. Philosophy of Language. Worcester & London: Harper & Row.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fabian, Reinhard. 1975. Sinn und Bedeutung von Namen und Sätzen: Eine Untersuchung zur Semantik Gottlob Freges. Diss., Graz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1968. “The Case for Case”. Universals in Linguistic Theory ed. by Emmon Bach & Robert T. Harms, 1–88. London & New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1971. Schriften zur Logik und Sprachphilosophie. Aus dem Nachlaßhrsg. von Gottfried Gabriel. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1891. “Funktion und Begriff”. Abdr. in Frege 1975.17–39.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1892. “Was ist eine Funktion?” Abdr. in Frege 1975.81–90.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1975. Funktion, Begriff, Bedeutung: Fünf logische Studien. Hrsg. von Günther Patzig. 4., ergänzte Aufl. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. (1. Aufl., 1962.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geach, Peter Thomas. 1962. Reference and Generality. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Univ. Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gipper, Helmut. 1972. Gibt es ein sprachliches Relativitätsprinzip? Untersuchungen zur Sapir-Whorf-Hypothese. Frankfurt/M.: S. Fischer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.. 1957. Essays in Linguistics. Chicago: Chicago Univ. Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, Robert A. Jr. 1936. “Linguistic Theory in the Italian Renaissance”. Lg 131.96–107.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, James (1709–80). 1794. Hermes; or, A Philosophical Inquiry concerning Universal Grammar. 5th. ed. London: Printed for F. Wingrave … (1.Aufl. 1751.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm von. 1969. Schriften zur Sprachphilosophie. (= Bd. 3 der Werke in 5 Bänden, hrsg. von A. Flitner und K. Giel, 3. Aufl.) Darmstadt: Wiss. Buchges. (1. Aufl., 1963.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1971. Linguistic Variability and Intellectual Development. Transl, by George C. Buck and Frithjof A. Raven. Coral Gables, Fla.: Univ. of Miami Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaplan, P. 1969. “What is Russell’s Theory of Descriptions?”. Logic, Physics and History ed. by W. Yourgrau. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kate, Lambert ten (1674–1731). 1723. Aenleiding tot de kennisse van het verhevene Deel der Nederduitsche Sprake. Amsterdam: R. en G. Wetstein.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kauppi, Raili. 1959. “Über Sinn, Bedeutung und Wahrheitswert der Sätze”. Acta Academiae Paedagogicae Jyväkyläensis 171.205–13.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kelly, Louis Gerard. 1974. Rez. von G. L. Bursill-Hall, Speculative Grammars of the Middle Ages (The Hague: Mouton, 1971), und Bursill-Hall, ed., Thomas of Erfurt: Grammatica speculativa (London: Longman, 1972). HL 1:2.203–19.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klemke, E. D., Hrg. 1968. Essays on Frege. Urbana-Chicago-London: Univ. of Illinois Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K. 1972. “Towards a Historiography of Linguistics: 19th and 20th century paradigms”. AnL 14:7.255–80.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1974. “Animadversions on some Recent Claims regarding the Relationship between Georg von der Gabelentz and Ferdinand de Saussure”. Studi Saussuriani per Robert Godei ed. by René Amacker et al., 165–80. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
.1975. “European Structuralism: Early Beginnings”. Current Trends in Linguistics ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, vol. 13:2.717–827. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd. ed. Chicago: Chicago Univ. Press. (1st ed., 1962.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin. 1969. Review of Grammaire générale et raisonnée ou La grammaire de Port-Royal ed. by Herbert E. Brekle (Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1966). Lg 451.343–64.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lausberg, Heinrich. 1971. Elemente der literarischen Rhetorik. 4.Aufl. München: Hueber. (1.Aufl., 1963.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Percival, W. Keith. 1972. “On the Non-Existence of Cartesian Linguistics”. Cartesian Studies ed. by R. J. Butler, 137–45. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinborg, Jan. 1967. Die Entwicklung der Sprachtheorie im Mittelalter. (= Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie und Theologie des Mittelalters , 42:2.) Münster: Aschendorff; Kopenhagen: Frost-Hansen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1972. Logik und Semantik im Mittelalter. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinborg, Jan & Heinrich Roos, eds. 1969. Boethius Dacus: Modi significando (= Corpus Philosophorum Danicorum Medii Aevi , 41). Kopenhagen: Gad.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ricken, Ulrich. 1961. “Sensualismus und Rationalismus in der Diskussion um die Wortstellung”. Literaturgeschichte als geschichtlicher Auftrag: Werner Krauss zum 60. Geburtstag. Festgabe von seinen Leipziger Kollegen und Schülern hrsg. von Werner Bahner, 97–122. Berlin: Rütten & Loening.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1963. “La discussion linguistique en France au XVIIIe siècle, reflet de la lutte philosophique du Siècle des Lumières. Analele Stiintifice ale Universitatii “Al. I. Cuza.” 91.71–88.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1964. “Condillacs liaison des idées und die clarté des Französischen”. NS 121.552–67.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1969. “La liaison des idées selon Condillac et la clarté du français”. Dix-huitième Siècle 11.179–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rivetti Barbó, Francesca. 1965. “Sense, Denotation, and the Context of Sentences”. Contributions to Logic and Methodology in Honor of J. M. Bocheński ed. by A.-T. Tymieniecka, 208–42. Amsterdam: North Holland Pub. Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosiello, Luigi. 1967. Linguistica illuminista. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salus, Peter H. 1969. “PRE- Pre-Cartesian Linguistics”. Papers of the Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 429–34. Chicago: Dept. of Linguistics; Univ. of Chicago.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1971. “The Modistae as Proto-Generativists”. Papers of the Seventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 530–34. Ibid.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1972. “The Modistae as Generative Grammarians”. Preprints of Papers, 56–58. Bologna: 11th Intern. Congress of Linguists.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scaglione, Aldo. 1972. The Classical Theory of Composition from its Origins to the Present: A historical survey. Chapel Hill, N.C.: Univ. of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich. 1808. Über die Sprache und Weisheit der Indier: Ein Beitrag zur Begründung der Alterthumskunde. Heidelberg: Mohr & Zimmer. (Neue Ausg., Amsterdam: J. Benjamins, 1977.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schleicher, August. 1859. Zur Morphologie der Sprache (= Mémoires de l’Académie Impériale des Sciences de St. Pétersbourg , VIIe série, Tome I, no.7.). St. Petersburg: Eggers & Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmidt, Siegfried J. 1968. Sprache und Denken als sprachphilosophisches Problem von Locke bis Wittgenstein. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. ed. 1911. Philosophie als Sprachkritik im 19. Jahrhundert, 2.Bd. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sebeok, Thomas A., ed. 1975. Current Trends in Linguistics, vol.131: Historiography of Linguistics. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tarski, Alfred. 1936. “Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den formalisierten Sprachen”. Studia philosophica 1.1 (Engl, übers, in Tarski, Logic, Semantics, Mathematics, 261–405. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1956.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Timpanaro, Sebastiano. 1972. “Friedrich Schlegel e gli inizi della unguistica indoeuropea in Germania”. Critica Storica N.S. 91.72–105. (Engl. Übers, in Friedrich Schlegel, Über die Sprache und Weisheit der Indier, neu hrgg. von E. F. K. Koerner, XI–XLVIII. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins, 1977.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trentman, John A. 1976. Rez. von D. P. Henry, Commentary on “De Grammatico”: The historical-logical dimensions of a dialogue of St. Anselm’s. (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1974). HL 3:1.98–106.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tugendhat, Ernst. 1970. “The Meaning of ‘Bedeutung’ in FregeAnalysis 301.177–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Welding, S. O. 1971. “Frege’s Sense and Reference Related to Russell’s Theory of Definite Descriptions”. Revue internationale de Philosophie 251.389–402.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Driel, Lodewijk van
1988. 19th-century linguistics. Historiographia Linguistica 15:1-2  pp. 155 ff. DOI logo
SWIGGERS, PIERRE
1982. A PROPOS D'UNE OPPOSITION FUNDAMENTALE DANS L'HISTORIOGRAPHIE DE LA LINGUISTIQUE. Folia Linguistica Historica 16:Historica vol. 3,2 DOI logo
[no author supplied]
1993. 8 Quellen und Literatur. In Die Semantik des Unbekannten,  pp. 323 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue