Article published In: Robert Lowth (1710-1787): The making of his grammar and its influence
Guest-edited by Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade
[Historiographia Linguistica 39:1] 2012
► pp. 61–75
“My imperfect attempt towards an English Grammar”
Lowth’s indebtedness to James Harris in revising his grammar
Published online: 22 March 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.39.1.05tie
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.39.1.05tie
Summary
This article provides an analysis of the only evidence that has — to the author’s knowledge — come down to us of the correspondence between the most authoritative 18th-century English grammarian Robert Lowth (1710–1787) and James Harris (1709–1780), author of the philosophical grammar Hermes (1751). The two extant letters uniquely provide insight into Lowth’s views on the pedagogical function of his grammar, on the innovatory aspect of his critical footnotes, and on some of the doubts and uncertainties he experienced while writing his grammar. All this adds to the radically different view of Lowth as a grammarian presented in The Bishop’s Grammar (Tieken-Boon van Ostade 2011), while the article also throws light on Lowth’s attempts at establishing a more private relationship with the author of one of the most important works within the wider 18th-century English grammatical tradition.
Résumé
Cette contribution présente une analyse de la seule preuve — à la connaissance de l’auteur — de la correspondance entre le grammairien anglais le plus autorisé du XVIIIème siècle Robert Lowth (1710–1787) et James Harris (1709–1780), auteur de la grammaire philosophique Hermes (1751). Les deux lettres existantes fournissent de façon unique un aperçu des opinions de Lowth sur la fonction pédagogique de sa grammaire, sur l’aspect novateur de ses notes critiques et sur quelques-uns des doutes et des incertitudes qu’il a éprouvés en écrivant sa grammaire. Tout cela ajoute à la vision radicalement différente de Lowth comme un grammairien présentée dans The Bishop’s Grammar (Tieken-Boon van Ostade 2011), tandis que l’article jette également de la lumière sur les tentatives de Lowth pour établir une relation plus intime avec l’auteur de l’un des plus d’importants travaux dans le cadre général de la tradition grammaticale en anglais pendant le XVIIIe siècle.
Zusammenfassung
Der Beitrag enthält eine Analyse des — nach Kenntnis der Autorin — einzigen Zeugnisses für die Korrespondenz zwischen den im 18. Jahrhundert bekanntesten englischen Grammatikern Robert Lowth (1710–1787) und James Harris (1709–1780), Autor der philosophischen Grammatik Hermes (1751). Beide erhaltenen Briefe bieten einen Einblick in die Ansichten von Lowth bezüglich der pädagogische Funktion seiner Grammatik, in den innovativen Aspekt seiner kritischen Anmerkungen und illustrieren einige Zweifel und Unsicherheiten, die er während des Abfassens seiner Grammatik erfuhr. All dies fügt sich zu dem deutlich anderen Blick des Grammatikers Lowth in The Bishop’s Grammar (Tieken- Boon van Ostade 2011); ferner zeigt der Beitrag seine Bemühungen, eine persönliche Beziehung mit dem Autor eines der wichtigsten Werke in der grammatischen Tradition des 18. Jahrhunderts in England aufzubauen.
References (22)
Burrows, Donald & Rosemary Dunhill. 2002. Music and Theatre in Handel’s World: The family papers of James Harris, 1732–1780. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cash, Derek. 2002. Access to Museum Culture: The British Museum from 1753 to 1836. <[URL]>.
ECCO: Eighteenth Century Collections Online. Thomson Gale.
Harris, James. 1751. Hermes: or, a Philosophical Inquiry concerning Language and Universal Grammar. London: printed for J. Nourse.
Harris, James. 1781. Philological Inquiries in Three Parts by James Harris Esq. Volume I1. London: printed for C. Nourse.
Lowth, Robert. 1762. A Short Introduction to English Grammar; with critical notes. London: J. Hughs for A. Millar, and for R. and J. Dodsley.
Michael, Ian. 1970. English Grammatical Categories and the Tradition to 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Miyawaki, Masataka. 2002. James Harris’s Theory of Universal Grammar: A synthesis of the Aristotelian and Platonic conceptions of language. Münster: Nodus.
Mossner, E. C. & I. S. Ross, eds. 1987. Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith. Volume VI1. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
Navest, Karlijn. 2006. “An index of names to Lowth’s Short Introduction to English Grammar (1762), (1763), (1764)”. Historical Sociolinguistics and Sociohistorical Linguistics 61 ([URL]; go to: Contents, Articles).
. Online edition: [URL]
. Online edition: [URL]
Probyn, Clive T. 1991. The Sociable Humanist: The life and works of James Harris 1709–1780. Provincial and metropolitan culture in eighteenth-century England. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 2000. “Robert Dodsley and the Genesis of Lowth’s Short Introduction to English Grammar
”. Historiographia Linguistica 27:1.21–36.
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 2003. “‘Tom’s grammar’: The genesis of Lowth’s Short Introduction to English Grammar revisited”. The Teaching of English in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries: Essays for Ian Michael on his 88th birthday ed. by Frances Austen & Christopher Stray (= Special issue of Paradigm 2/7), 36–45.
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 2011. The Bishop’s Grammar: Robert Lowth and the rise of prescriptivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
van Ostade, Ingrid Tieken-Boon
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
