Article published In: Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 38:3 (2011) ► pp.255–292
The ‘Glaring’ Place of Prepositions
Grammar, Rhetoric and the Scottish Codifiers
Published online: 24 October 2011
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.38.3.01yan
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.38.3.01yan
Summary
This paper offers new insights into the 18th-century normative tradition, with special reference to the stigmatisation of preposition stranding. It brings to light the role of Scottish codifiers in contrast to English codifiers: works written by Scots contain more critical comments on the use of end-placed prepositions both quantitatively (in terms of frequency) and qualitatively (more semantic nuances and more condemnatory epithets). The semantic analysis of the data rules out the hypothesis that Scottish authors might have been particularly sensible towards this construction because of its nature as ‘provincial English’ or as a ‘Scotticism’. Rather, the author suggests that it was the ‘New Rhetoric’ movement (1748–1793) in the context of the Scottish Enlightenment that played a vital role in its stigmatisation. The importance of rhetoric as a facet of 18th-century prescriptivism, complementary to grammar, is thus put under the spotlight.
Résumé
Cet article offre des vues nouvelles sur la tradition normative du XVIIIe siècle, en se référant spécialement à la stigmatisation du rejet de la preposition (angl. ‘preposition stranding’). Il révèle le rôle des codificateurs écossais, qui contraste avec celui des codificateurs anglais : les ouvrages écrits par des Ecossais contiennent plus de commentaires critiques sur l’usage des prépositions placées en fin de phrase, tout à la fois sur le plan quantitatif (en termes de fréquence) que qualitatif (plus de nuances sémantiques et plus de qualificatifs condamnant cet usage). L’analyse sémantique des données ruine l’hypothèse selon laquelle les auteurs écossais auraient été particulièrement sensibles à cette construction, du fait de sa nature d’‘anglais provincial’ ou de ‘particularité ecossaise’. Plus exactement, l’auteur suggère que c’est le mouvement de la ‘Nouvelle Rhétorique’ (1748–1793), dans le contexte des Lumières écossaises, qui a joué un rôle crucial dans cette stigmatisation. L’importance de la rhétorique, comme une des facettes du prescriptivisme du XVIIIe siècle, en complément de la grammaire, est ainsi mise en lumière.
Zusammenfassung
Der Beitrag bietet neue Argumente zur normativen Tradition des Englischen, speziell was die Stigmatisierung ungewöhnlicher syntaktischer Verwendungen von Präpositionen anbelangt. Schottische normative Grammatiker unterscheiden sich hierin von ihren britischen Kollegen, finden sich doch in ihren Werken deutlich mehr kritische Kommentare hinsichtlich der Endstellung von Präpositionen als in den britischen, und dies sowohl in quantitativer (die Frequenz betreffend) als auch in qualitativer Hinsicht (mehr semantische Nuancen und mehr kritische Epitheta). Die semantische Analyse der Daten spricht gegen die Annahme, schottische Autoren seien besonders empfindlich gegen diese Konstruktionen gewesen, weil sie sie als ‘provinzielles Englisch’ oder als ‘Schottismen’ angesehen hätten. Die Verfasserin ist vielmehr der Ansicht, die ‘New Rhetoric’ (1748–1793) und die Schottische Aufklärung seien maßgeblich für die Stigmatisierung dieser syntaktischen Konstruktionen gewesen. Nicht zuletzt darin zeigt sich auch die Bedeutung der Rhetorik für die Grammatik und erweist sich als wichtiger Teilaspekt des Präskriptivismus des 18. Jahrhunderts.
References (78)
11. The majority of the 18th-century primary sources documented in the databases have been consulted in ECCO.
Aitken, A[dam] J[ames]. 1979. “Scottish Speech: A historical view with special reference to the Standard English of Scotland”. Languages of Scotland ed. by A. J. Aitken & Tom McArthur, 85–118. Edinburgh: Chambers.
Arnovick, Leslie K. 1997. “Proscribed Collocations with shall and will: The Eighteenth-Century (Non-)Standard Reassessed”. Taming the Vernacular: From dialect to written standard language ed. by Jenny Cheshire & Dieter Stein, 135–151. London: Longman.
Bailey, Richard W. 1991. “Scots and Scotticisms: Language and ideology”. Studies in Scottish Literature 261.65–77.
Basker, James G. 1993. “Scotticisms and the Problem of Cultural Identity in Eighteenth-Century Britain”. Sociability and Society in Eighteenth-Century Scotland ed. by John Dwyer & Richard B. Sher, 81–95. Edinburgh: Mercat Press.
Beal, Joan C. 1999. English Pronunciation in the Eighteenth Century: Thomas Spence’s Grand Repository of the English Language (1775). Oxford: Clarendon.
Beal, Joan C. 2003. “John Walker: Prescriptivist or linguistic innovator?”. Dossena & Jones, eds. 2003.83–105.
Beal, Joan C. 2004b. “‘Marks of Disgrace’: Attitudes to Non-Standard Pronunciation in Eighteenth-Century Pronouncing Dictionaries”. Methods and Data in English Historical Dialectology ed. by Marina Dossena & Roger Lass, 329–349. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Beal, Joan C., Carmela Nocera & Massimo Sturiale, eds. 2008. Perspectives on Prescriptivism. Bern: Peter Lang.
Broadie, Alexander, ed. 2003. The Cambridge Companion to the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, Ian, Thomas Owen Clancy, Susan Manning & Murray Pittock, eds. 2007. The Edinburgh History of Scottish Literature. Vol. II1: Enlightenment, Britain and Empire (1707–1918). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Carr, Stephen L. 2002. “The Circulation of Blair’s ‘Lectures’”. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 32:4.75–104.
Dossena, Marina. 1997. “The Search for Linguistic Excellence in Late Eighteenth-Century Scotland”. Textus 101.355–376.
Dossena, Marina. 2003. “Scots”. Germanic Standardizations – Past to Present ed. by Ana Deumart & Wim Vandenbussche, 383–404. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Dossena, Marina. 2005. Scotticisms in Grammar and Vocabulary: ‘Like Runes upon a Standin’ Stane’. Edinburgh: John Donald.
Dossena, Marina & Charles Jones, eds. 2003. Insights into Late Modern English. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
ECCO: Eighteenth-Century Collections Online. Thomson Gale.
María E. Rodríguez-GilECEG: Eighteenth-Century English Grammars database, 2010. Compiled by María E. Rodríguez-Gil (University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria) & Nuria Yáñez-Bouza (The University of Manchester). Online access: [URL]
Fens-de Zeeuw, Lyda. Forthcoming. Lindley Murray (1745–1826), Quaker and Grammarian. (=
Utrecht LOT Dissertation Series, 283.) Utrecht.
Fitzmaurice, Susan, ed. 2000. Rhetoric, Language and Literature: New Perspectives on English in the Eighteenth Century (= Special issue of Language Sciences 22:3).
Frank, Thomas. 1994. “Language Standardization in Eighteenth-Century Scotland”. Towards a Standard English, 1600–1800 ed. by Dieter Stein & Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade, 51–62. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Görlach, Manfred. 1999. English in Nineteenth-Century England: An introduction. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gustafsson, Larisa Oldireva. 2008. “Phonoaesthetic Assessment of Words in Eighteenth-Century Prescriptions and Later”. Beal et al., eds. 2008.83–112.
Hickey, Raymond. 2009. “‘Telling People How to Speak’: Rhetorical grammars and pronouncing dictionaries”. Tieken-Boon van Ostade & van der Wurff, eds. 2009.89–116.
Hickey, Raymond, ed. 2010. Eighteenth-Century English: Ideology and change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hodson, Jane. 2006. “The Problem of Joseph Priestley’s (1733–1804) Descriptivism”. Historiographia Linguistica 33:1/2.57–84.
Hogg, Richard M. 2008. “Standardisation: The North-British View”. German Life and Letters 611.521–532.
Jones, Charles. 1995. A Language Suppressed: The pronunciation of Scots in the eighteenth century. Edinburgh: John Donald.
Jones, Charles. 1997. “An Early Eighteenth-Century Scottish Spelling Book for Ladies”. English Studies 78:5.430–450.
Jones, Charles. 2006. English Pronunciation in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Jones, Charles, 2010. “Nationality and Standardisation in Eighteenth-Century Scotland”. Hickey, ed. 2010.221–234.
Leonard, S[terling] A[ndrus]. 1929. The Doctrine of Correctness in English Usage 1700–1800. Madison: University of Wisconsin. (Repr., New York: Russell & Russell, 1962.)
McIntosh, Carey. 1998. The Evolution of English Prose 1700–1800: Style, Politeness, and Print Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McIntosh, Carey. 2000. “Elementary Rhetorical Ideas and Eighteenth-Century English”. Language Sciences 22:3.231–249.
Meurman-Solin, Anneli. 2000. “Change from Above or Below? Mapping the loci of linguistic change in the history of Scottish English”. Wright, ed. 2000.155–170.
Michael, Ian. 1970. English Grammatical Categories and the Tradition to 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Michael, Ian. 1987. The Teaching of English from the Sixteenth Century to 1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Miller, Jim. 2004. “Scottish English: Morphology and syntax”. The British Isles, Vol. II1: Morphology and Syntax ed. by Bernd Kortmann & Clive Upton, 47–72. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Milroy, James & Lesley Milroy. 1985. Authority in Language: Investigating language prescription and standardisation. London & New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Moran, Michael G., ed. 1994. Eighteenth-Century British and American Rhetorics and Rhetoricians: Critical studies and sources. New York: Greenwood Press.
Mugglestone, Lynda. 2003 [1995]. ‘Talking Proper’: The rise of accent as social symbol. 2nd revised ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Navest, Karlijn. 2011. John Ash and the Rise of the Children’s Grammar. Doctoral dissertation, Leiden University.
ODNB: Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. 2004. Online edition: [URL]
Pérez-Guerra, Javier, Dolores González-Álvarez, Jorge Luis Bueno-Alonso & Esperanza Rama-Martínez, eds. 2007. ‘Of Varying Language and Opposing Creed’: New insights into Late Modern English. Bern: Peter Lang.
Rodríguez-Gil, María E. 2002. Teaching English Grammar in the Eighteenth Century: Ann Fisher. Doctoral dissertation, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria.
Rodríguez-Gil, María E. & Nuria Yáñez-Bouza. 2009. “The ECEG Database: A bio-bibliographic approach to the study of eighteenth-century English Grammars”. Tieken-Boon van Ostade & van der Wurff, eds. 2009.153–182.
Sher, Richard B. 1991. “Scottish Divines and Legal Lairds: Boswell’s Scots Presbyterian Identity”. New Light on Boswell ed. by Greg Clingham, 28–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sher, Richard B. 2007. The Enlightenment and the Book: Scottish authors and their publishers in eighteenth-century Britain, Ireland, and America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Short, Bryan C. 2000. “Figurative Language in the Scottish New Rhetoric”. Language Sciences 22:3.251–264.
Smout, Thomas C. 2007. “Scotland as North Britain: The historical background, 1707–1918”. Brown et al., eds. 2007.1–11.
Straaijer, Robin. 2011. Joseph Priestley, Grammarian: Late Modern English normativism and usage in a sociohistorical context. Utrecht: LOT, Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.
Sturiale, Massimo. 2006. “William Perry’s The Royal Standard English Dictionary (1775): A provincial’s attempt to ascertain and fix a standard to the pronunciation of the English tongue”. Historiographia Linguistica 33:1/2.139–168.
Sturiale, Massimo. 2008. “Prescriptivism and Eighteenth-Century Bilingual Dictionaries: William Perry’s The Standard of French and English Pronouncing Dictionary (1795)”. Beal et al., eds. 2008.181–195.
Sundby, Bertil, Anne Kari Bjørge & Kari E. Haugland. 1991. A Dictionary of English Normative Grammar 1700–1800. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 1985. “‘I will be drowned and no man shall save me’: The conventional rules for shall and will in eighteenth-century English grammars”. English Studies 66:2.123–142.
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 2000. “Normative Studies in England”. History of the Language Sciences/Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaften/Histoire des Sciences du Langage ed. by Sylvain Aroux, E. F. K. Koerner, Hans-Josef Niederehe & Kees Versteegh, vol. I1, 876–887. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 2008a. “Grammars, Grammarians and Grammar-Writing: An introduction”. Tieken-Boon van Ostade, ed. 2008b.1–14.
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid, ed. 2008b. Grammars, Grammarians and Grammar-Writing in Eighteenth-Century England. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 2011. The Bishop’s Grammar: Robert Lowth and the rise of prescriptivism in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid & Wim van der Wurff, eds. 2009. Current Issues in Late Modern English. Bern: Peter Lang.
Ward, Charles E., ed. 1965 [1942]. The Letters of John Dryden, with Letters addressed to him, collected and edited. New York: AMS Press.
Watts, Richard J. 2000. “Mythical Strands in the Ideology of Prescriptivism”. Wright, ed. 2000.29–48.
Watts, Richard J. 2008. “Grammar Writers in Eighteenth-Century Britain: A community of practice or a discourse community?”. Tieken-Boon van Ostade, ed. 2008b.37–56.
Wright, Laura, ed. 2000. The Development of Standard English, 1300–1800: Theories, descriptions, conflicts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria. 2007. Preposition Stranding and Prescriptivism in English from 1500 to 1900: A corpus-based approach. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Manchester.
Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria. 2008. “Preposition Stranding in the Eighteenth Century: Something to talk about
”. Tieken-Boon van Ostade, ed. 2008b.251–277.
Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria. 2011. “Grammar Writing and Provincial Grammar Printing in the Eighteenth-Century British Isles”. Transactions of the Philological Society 109:3.
Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria. Forthcoming. “Mapping Eighteenth-Century Grammarians in the British Isles (and beyond)”. To appear in Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English (VARIENG), [URL]
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
