Article published In: Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 36:1 (2009) ► pp.75–95
Francis Whyte Ellis and the Beginning of Comparative Dravidian Linguistics
Published online: 6 April 2009
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.36.1.04sre
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.36.1.04sre
Summary
This article assesses Francis Whyte Ellis’s (1777–1819) “Note to the Introduction” to Alexander Duncan Campbell’s (1789–1857) Grammar of the Teloogoo Language (1816) in the context of the history of comparative linguistics in India. The idea of a ‘South Indian family of languages’, later named ‘Dravidian’ by Robert Caldwell in 1856, was first proposed by Ellis in 1816, and so a case could be made to claim for him the beginnings of a comparative methodology in the study of Dravidian languages. Until now, in the history of comparative Dravidian linguistics Caldwell (1814–1891) has been celebrated as the pioneer in this field. The present study attempts to establish Ellis’s rightful place in this history by critically evaluating his contribution. The careful examination of the data presented by Ellis indeed suggests that he should be regarded as the discoverer of the Dravidian family of languages well before Caldwell.
Résumé
Dans cet article on évalue la “Note introductoire” qu’a écrite Francis Whyte Ellis (1777–1819) pour l’ouvrage d’Alexander Ducan Campbell (1789–1857), Grammar of the Teloogoo Language (1816): évaluation qui prend pour cadre l’histoire de la grammaire comparée en Inde. C’est Ellis qui, le premier, a proposé l’idée d’une ‘famille linguistique de l’Inde méridionale’, que Caldwell appellera plus tard ‘Dravidienne’ (en 1856): on pourrait donc soutenir qu’Ellis serait le véritable initiateur d’une méthode comparée appliquée aux langues dravidiennes. Jusqu’à présent c’est Caldwell (1814–1891) qui, dans l’histoire de la linguistique comparée des langues dravidennes, a eu le statut de fondateur de ce domaine. Cette étude cherche à rendre à Ellis sa juste place dans cette histoire au moyen d’une évaluation critique de ce qu’il a produit. En examinant de près les données offertes par Ellis, il semble bien qu’il faille voir en lui celui qui, bien avant Caldwell, a découvert la famille des langues dravidiennes.
Zusammenfassung
In diesem Beitrag geht es um Francis Whyte Ellis (1777–1819) und seine “Note to the Introduction” zur Grammar of the Teloogoo Language (1816) von Alexander Duncan Campbell (1789–1857)] sowie deren Beziehung zur Geschichte der vergleichenden Sprachwissenschaft in Indien. Die Idee einer ‘Südindischen Sprachfamilie’, 1856 von Robert Caldwell ‘Dravidisch’ genannt, war 1816 bereits von Ellis vorgeschlagen worden, dessen Studien daher mit Recht als Anfang der vergleichenden dravidischen Sprachwissenschaft angesehen werden können. Bislang wurde allerdings Caldwell (1814–1891) als ihr Begründer genannt. Die vorliegende Untersuchung unternimmt den Versuch, Ellis wohlverdienten Platz in dieser Geschichte durch eine genaue Sichtung seines wissenschaftlichen Beitrages darzulegen. Eine Analyse seiner Schriften legt es in der Tat nahe, ihn und nicht Caldwell als den Entdecker der dravidischen Sprachfamilie anzusehen.
References (69)
Agesthialingom, S. & S. Sakthivel, comps. 1973. A Bibliography of Dravidian Linguistics. Annamalai: Annamalai University.
Agesthialingom, S. & N. Rajasekharan Nair, eds. 1981. Dravidian Syntax. Annamalainagar: Annamalai University.
Andronov, M. S. 1964. “Materials for a Bibliography of Dravidian Linguistics”. Tamil Culture 11:1.3–50.
Ali, Daud, ed. 1999. Invoking the Past: The use of history in South Asia. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Asher, R[onald] E. 1968. “Notes on F. W. Ellis and an Unpublished Fragment of His Commentary on Tirukkural”. Proceedings of the First International Conference of Tamil Studies Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, April 1966 ed. by Xavier S. Thani Nayagam et al., vol. II1, 513–521. Kuala Lumpur: International Association of Tamil Research.
Asher, R. E. 1994. “Ellis, Francis Whyte (ca.1778–1819)”. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics ed. by R. E. Asher et al., vol. III1, 1106–1107. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Bloch, Jules. 1954 [1946]. The Grammatical Structure of Dravidian Languages. Translated from the French by R. G. Harshe. Poona: Daccan College Post Graduate and Research Institute.
Bopp, Franz. 1816. Über das Conjugationssystem der Sanskritsprache in Vergleichung mit jenem der griechischen, persischen und germanischen Sprache. Frankfurt/Main: Andreäische Buchhandlung.
Brown, C[harles] P[hilip]. 1857 [1837]. A Grammar of the Telugu Language. 2nd ed. Madras: Christian Knowledge Society’s Press. (Repr., New Delhi: Asian Educational Service, 1981.)
Brown, Jason W. 1996. Review of Reader in the History of Aphasia: From Franz Gall to Norman Geschwind ed. by Paul Eling (Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1994). The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 184:4.264 (April 1996).
Burrow, T[homas] & M[urray] B[arnson] Emeneau. 1984. A Dravidian Etymological Dictionary. 2nd revised ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Caldwell, Robert. 1913 [1856]. A Comparative Grammar of the Dravidian or South Indian Family of Languages. London: Kegan, Paul, Trench, Trubner. (2nd ed., 1875; 3rd ed., revised and edited by J. L. Wyatt & T. Ramakrishna Pillai. Repr., Madras: Madras University, 1976.)
Campbell, Alexander D[uncan]. 1991 [1816]. A Grammar of the Teloogoo Language, commonly termed the Gentoo, peculiar to the Hindoos inhabiting the North Eastern provinces of the Indian Peninsula. Madras: College Press of Fort St. George. (Repr., New Delhi: Asian Educational Service, 1991.)
Carey, William. 1804. A Grammar of the Sanscrit language, Composed from the Works of the most esteemed Hindoo grammarians. Serampore: Mission Press.
Colebrooke, Henry Thomas. 1801. “On the Sanscrit and Pracrit Languages”. Asiatick Researches 71.199–231.
Deshpande, Madhav M. 1979. Sociolinguistic Attitudes in India: An historical reconstruction. With a foreword by M. B. Emeneau. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Karoma Publishing.
Deshpande, Madhav M. & Peter Edwin Hook, eds. 1979. Aryan and Non-Aryan in India. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies, University of Michigan.
Ellis, Francis Whyte. 1816. “Note to the Introduction”. Campbell 1991 [1816].1–31 (separately numbered). (Repr. by Rao (1954/55) in Annals of Oriental Research of the University of Madras 121.1–35 and in Trautmann 2005: 7–13; 2006: 243–276.)
. 1878. “Dissertation on the Malayalam Language”. The Indian Antiquary 71.275–287. (First published by Walter Elliot; repr., with an introductory note, by Ramachandran 2005: 17–46.)
Gopinathan Nair, B. 2005. “A Dravidian Etymological Dictionary and its Impact on Comparative Dravidian Studies”. International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics 34:2.89–106.
Hall, Kenneth R., ed. 2001. Structure and Society in Early South India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Israel, M. 1966. “Additional Materials for a Bibliography of Dravidian Linguistics”. Tamil Culture (Madras) 12:1.69–74.
Jones, Sir William. 1787 [1786]. “On the Hindus: Third anniversary discourse”. Asiatic Researches 11.415–431.
. 1787. “A Dissertation on the Orthography of Asiatick Words in Roman Letters”. Asiatick Researches 11.1–56.
Joseph, P. M. 1989. “The Word Drāvida
”. International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics 18:2.132–142.
Koerner, E. F. K. 1978. Towards a Historiography of Linguistics: Selected essays. Foreword by R. H. Robins. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2000. “Comprehensive Alphabetical Index by Names and by Titles”. Historiographia Linguistica, Supplement I1: Index Vol. I–XXV 1973–1998, 69–196. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
2003. “On the Place of Linguistic Historiography within the Language Sciences, again”. History of Linguistics 1999: Selected papers from the Eighth International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences, 14–19 September 1999, Fontenay-St.Cloud ed. by Sylvain Auroux, 375–387. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Koerner, E. F. K. & R. E. Asher, eds. 1995. Concise History of the Language Sciences: From the Sumerians to the Cognitivists. Oxford & New York: Pergamon Press.
Krishnamurti, Bh[adriraju]. 2001. Comparative Dravidian Linguistics: Current perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nagraja, K. S., V. P. Bhatta, Sonal Kulkarni-Joshi & P. M. Pingle, eds. 2007. Research Trends in Lexicography, Sanskrit and Linguistics: Proceedings of the Professor S. M. Katre birth century seminar. Pune: Deccan College Post-Graduate Research Institute.
Ramachandran, Puhusseri. 2005. F. W. Ellis on Malayalam Language. Thiruvananthapuram: Kannasavidhyapeetham.
Ramaiah, L. S., ed. 1994. An International Bibliography of Dravidian Languages and Linguistics. Vol. I1: General and Comparative Dravidian Languages and Linguistics. Chennai: T. R. Publications.
, ed. 1995. An International Bibliography of Dravidian Languages and Linguistics. Vol. II1: Tamil Language and Linguistics. Chennai: T. R. Publications.
, ed. 1998. An International Bibliography of Dravidian Languages and Linguistics. Vol. III1: Telugu Language and Linguistics. Chennai: T. R. Publications.
Ramaiah, L. S. & C. R. Karisiddappa, eds. 2003. An International Bibliography of Dravidian Languages and Linguistics. Vol. IV1: Kannada Language and Linguistics. Chennai: T. R. Publications.
Ramaiah, L. S. & N. Rajasekharan Nair, eds. 2001. An International Bibliography of Dravidian Languages and Linguistics. Vol. V1: Malayalam Language and Linguistics. Chennai: T. R. Publications.
Ramaiah, L. S. & B. Ramakrishna Reddy, eds. 2005. An International Bibliography of Dravidian Languages and Linguistics. Vol. VI1: The Tribal and Minor Dravidian Languages and Linguistics. Chennai: T. R. Publications.
Rao, N. Venkata. 1953. “Dissertation on the Telugu Language by Ellis”. Annals of Oriental Research of the University of Madras 111.1–6.
Reddy, B. Ramakrishna. 2000. “Dravidian Tribal Language Studies since Caldwell”. International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics 301.107–140.
. 2005. “Studies on Tribal and Minor Dravidian Languages: An introduction”. Ramaiah, ed. 2005.xvii–xlvii.
Sharada, B. A. 1989. “Research in Dravidian Linguistics: A quantitative analysis (as revealed through International Journal Dravidian Linguistics 1972–85)”. International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics 18:1.111–123.
2006. M. B. Emeneau: A bibliography with citation index. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages.
Sharada, B. A. & V. Vani. 1987. “Current Research in Dravidian Linguistics (as revealed through the International Journal Dravidian Linguistics 1981–85): A quantitative analysis”. International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics 16:1.134–143.
Schmitthenner, Peter Lee. 2001. Telugu Resurgence: C. P. Brown and cultural consolidation in nineteenth-century South India. New Delhi: Manohar Publishers & Distributors.
Subrahmanyam, P. S. 1987. “The Non Literary Languages and Their Contribution to Dravidian Comparative Grammar”. International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics 16:1.22–30.
1988. “Comparative Dravidian Studies from 1980”. International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics 17:1.59–91.
Thapar, Romila. 1999. “Some Appropriation of the Theory of Aryan Race Relating to the Beginnings of Indian History”. Ali, ed. 1999.15–35.
. 2003 [2000]. Cultural Past: Essays in early Indian history. 2nd ed., New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Trautmann, Thomas R. 1997. Aryans and British India. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press. (Indian ed., New Delhi: Vistaar Publications/Sage.)
2004. “Discovering Aryan and Dravidian in British India: A tale of two cities”. Historiographia Linguistica 31:1.33–58.
, ed. 2005. The Aryan Debate: Debates in Indian history and society. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
2006. Languages and Nations: The Dravidian proof in Colonial Madras. California: University of California Press.
Zvelebil, Kamil V. 1956. “One Hundred Years of Dravidian and Comparative Philology”. Tamil Culture 41.53–57.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Asher, R. E.
2010.
The Madras School of Orientalism: Producing knowledge in colonial South India. Edited by Thomas R. Trautmann. Historiographia Linguistica 37:1-2 ► pp. 226 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
