Article published In: Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 31:1 (2004) ► pp.59–104
Contested past
Anti-Brahmanical and Hindu nationalist reconstructions of Indian prehistory
Published online: 30 July 2004
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.31.1.05ber
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.31.1.05ber
Summary
During the British colonial regime in the 19th century Western Indologists and missionaries, with the participation of the indigenous scholars who controlled traditional systems of knowledge, formed models for the description of early religious history which was especially inspired by linguistic ideas whose central concept was the so-called ‘Aryan immigration’ into Northern India. This Orientalist historiography concerning events that lay back several thousand years found its way into political and religious discourse in one form or another. These projections developed into highly significant ingredients of the various political, ethnic, and religious movements and parties, such as the Dravidian Movement or the Nationalist Hindu groupings. The present paper tries to map out the corner stones of modern-day discourses concerning Indian pre- and early history which has developed into something of a veritable battle about the past..
Résumé
À l’époque de la domination coloniale britannique, au XIXe siècle, indologues occidentaux et missionaires chrétiens, avec la participation des érudits autochtones, détenteurs du savoir ancestral, mirent en place des modèles afin de décrire l’histoire religieuse ancienne du sous-continent indien. Ces modèles s’inspiraient lourdement de la science linguistique, dont l’idée centrale était la soi-disante ‘invasion aryenne’. Cette historiographie orientaliste, qui traitait d’événements remontant à plusieurs millénaires dans le passé, se retrouva par la suite, sous une forme ou une autre, dans les représentations politiques et religieuses. Elle joua un rôle important au sein de divers mouvements et partis, tels que le mouvement Dravidien ou les regroupements nationalistes Hindous. Le présent article cherche à identifier les points principaux de cette représentation moderne de la préhistoire et de l’histoire ancienne indiennes; représentation qui semble parfois devenir un combat portant sur le passé.
Zusammenfassung
Während der britischen Kolonialherrschaft im 19. Jahrhundert begründeten westliche Indologen und christliche Missionare unter Beteiligung Gelehrter der traditionellen einheimischen Wissenssysteme ein vor allem von Sprachwissenschaft inspiriertes Beschreibungsmodell der frühen südasiatischen Religionsgeschichte, dessen zentrale Idee die sogenannte “arische Einwanderung” war. Diese orientalistische Geschichtsschreibung über Ereignisse, die mehrere tausend Jahre zurücklagen, fand unter unterschiedlichen Vorzeichen Eingang in politische und religiöse Diskurse, und in der Folgezeit wurden diese Projektionen in hohem Maße Bestandteil des Selbstverständnisses verschiedenster politischer und religiöser Bewegungen und Parteien in Indien (z. B. in der dravidischen Bewegung und in hindu-nationalistischen Gruppierungen). Der Beitrag versucht die Eckpunkte dieses modernen Diskurses über die indische Vor- und Frühgeschichte, der im gegenwärtigen Indien geradezu zu einem Kampf um die Vergangenheit geworden ist, nachzuzeichnen.
References (146)
Ahir, Diwan Chand. 1992. Buddhism in South India. (=
Bibliotheca Indo-Buddhica, 112). Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications.
Aloysius, G. 1998. Religion as Emancipatory Identity: A Buddhist movement among the Tamils under colonialism. New Delhi: New Age International.
Aloysius, G. [Ñāṉ. Alāyciyas], ed. 1999. Ayōttitācar cintanaikaḷ [Thoughts of Iyothee Thass]. 21 vols. Palayamkottai: Folklore Resources and Research Centre St. Xavier’s College.
Ambedkar, B. R. 1989a [1947]. “Who were the Shudras? How they came to be the Fourth Varna in the Indo-Aryan Society”. Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar, Writings and Speeches ed. by Vasant Moon, 2nd ed., vol. I1, 1–227. Bombay: Education Department, Government of Maharashtra.
Anaimuthu, V. [Vē. Āṉaimuttu], ed. 1974. Periyār ī. ve. rā. cintaṉaikaḷ periyār ī. ve. irāmacāmi avarkaḷiṉ coṟpoḻivukaḷum kaṭṭaikaḷum [Thoughts of Periyar]. 31 vols. Tiruchirappalli: Thinker’s Forum.
Annadurai, C. N. [Ci. Eṉ. Aṇṇāturai]. 1995 [1943]. Āriyamāyai [Aryan illusion]. Ceṉṉai: Kaṇṇammāḷ patippakam.
Arnold, David. 1982. “Rebellious Hillmen: The Gudem-Rampa Risings 1839–1924”. Subaltern Studies. (New Delhi) 11.88–142.
Assmann, Jan. 1992. Das kulturelle Gedächtnis: Schrift, Erinnerung und politische Identität in frühen Hochkulturen. München: C. H. Beck.
Baker, Christopher John. 1976. The Politics of South India 1920–1937. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bayly, Susan. 1995. “Caste and ‘Race’ in the Colonial Ethnography of India”. The Concept of Race in South Asia ed. by Peter Robb (=
SOAS Studies on South Asia Understanding and Perspectives, [unnumbered].), 165–218. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
. 1999. Caste, Society and Politics in India from the Eighteenth Century to the Modern Age. (=
The New Cambridge History of India, IV:3). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bergunder, Michael. 2001. “Religiöser Pluralismus und nationale Identität: Der Konflikt um die politische Legitimierung des indischen Staates”. Religiöser Pluralismus und das Christentum: Festgabe für Helmut Obst zum 60. Geburtstag ed. by Michael Bergunder (=
Kirche – Konfession – Religion, 43), 157–173. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Bergunder, Michael & Rahul Peter Das, eds. 2002. “Arier” und “Draviden”: Konstruktionen der Vergangenheit als Grundlage für Selbstund Fremdwahrnehmungen Südasiens. Halle/ Saale: Verlag der Franckeschen Stiftungen.
Biswas, Swapan Kumar. 1995. Autochthon of India and the Aryan Invasion. (=
Re-written History Series, 1.) New Delhi: Genuine Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd.
Bronkhorst, Johannes & Madhav M. Deshpande, eds. 1999. Aryan and Non-Aryan in South Asia: Evidence, interpretation and ideology. (=
Harvard Oriental Series, Opera minora, 3.) Cambridge, Mass.: Department of Sanskrit and Indian Studies, Harvard University.
Bryant, Edwin. 2001. The Quest for the Origins of Vedic Culture: The Indo-Aryan migration debate. New York: Oxford University Press.
Caldwell, Robert. 1856. A Comparative Grammar of the Dravidian or South-Indian Family of Languages. London: Harrison.
Chakrabarti, Dilip K. 1997. Colonial Indology: Sociopolitics of the ancient Indian past. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal.
Cohen, Stephen P. 1969. “The Untouchable Soldier: Caste, politics and the Indian army”. Journal of Asian Studies (Ann Arbor, Mich.) 281.453–468.
Das, Rahul Peter. 2002. “Bengalischer Nationalismus und die Konstruktion einer austro-asiatischen Vergangenheit”. Bergunder & Das, eds. 2002.181–205.
Dayanandan Francis, T. 1990. The Mission and Message of Ramalinga Swamy. Delhi: Motilal Barnasidass.
Deshpande, Madhav M. & Peter Edwin Hook, eds. 1979. Aryan and Non-Aryan in India. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies, University of Michigan.
Dirks, Nicholas B. 2001. Castes of Mind: Colonialism and the making of Modern India. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.
Erdosy, George, ed. 1995. The Indo-Aryans of ancient South Asia: Language, material culture, and ethnicity. (=
Indian Philology and South Asian Studies; 1.) Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Feuerstein, Georg, Subhash Kak & David Frawley. 1995. In Search of the Cradle of Civilization: New light on ancient India. Wheaton, Ill.: The Theosophical Publishing House.
Fox, Richard G. 1992. “East of Said”. Edward Said: A critical reader ed. by Michael Sprinker, 144–156. Oxford: Blackwell.
Geetha, V. & S. V. Rajadurai. 1993. “Dalit and Non-Brahmin Consciousness in Colonial Tamil Nadu”. Economic and Political Weekly (Bombay) 281.2091–2098.
Ghosh, B. K. 1951. “The Aryan Problem”. The Vedic Age ed. by R. C. Majumdar (=
The History and Culture of the Indian People, 1), 205–221. Bombay: Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan.
Gooptu, Nandini. 1993. “Caste and Labour: Untouchable social movements in urban Uttar Pradesh in the early twentieth century”. Dalit Movements and the Meanings of Labour in India ed. by Peter Robb, 277–289. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Govindan, K. [Kā. Kōvintaṉ]. 1999. Tamiḻar paṇpāṭu [Culture of the Tamils]. Chennai: The Tirunelveli South India Saiva Siddhanta Works Publishing Society.
Graul, Karl. 1865. Kural of Tiruvalluvar. High-Tamil Text with translation into Common Tamil and Latin, notes and glossary. (=
Bibliotheca Tamulica; 4.) Leipzig: F. A. Brockhaus.
Gupta, Dipankar. 2000. Interrogating Caste: Understanding hierarchy and difference in Indian society. New Delhi: Penguin Books India.
Hansen, Thomas Blom. 1999. The Saffron Wave: Democracy and Hindu nationalism in modern India. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.
Hansen, Thomas Blom & Christophe Jaffrelot, eds. 1998. The BJP and the Compulsion of Politics in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Hellmann-Rajanayagam, Dagmar. 1984. Tamil: Sprache als politisches Symbol. (=
Beiträge zur Südasienforschung, 74.) Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner.
Hock, Hans Henrich. 2002. “Wem gehört die Vergangenheit? Frühund Vorgeschichte und indische Selbstwahrnehmung”. Bergunder & Das, eds. 2002.232–250.
Hudson, D. Dennis. 1992a. “Arumuga Navalar and the Hindu Renaissance among the Tamils”. Religious Controversy in British India: Dialogues in South Asian languages ed. by Kenneth W. Jones, 27–51, 246–255. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.
. 1992b. “Winning Souls for Siva: Arumuga Navalar’s transmission of the Saiva Religion”. A Sacred Thread: Modern transmission of Hindu tradition in India and abroad ed. by Raymond Brady Williams, 23–51. Chambersburg, Penn.: Anima Publications.
Ilaiah, Kancha. 1996. Why I Am Not a Hindu: A Sudra critique of Hindutva philosophy, culture and political conomy. Calcutta: Samya.
Ilangumaran, Ira. [Irā. Iḷaṅkumaraṉ]. 1995. Maṟaimalaiyaṭikaḷ [Maraimalai Adigal]. New Delhi: Sahitya Akademi.
Irschick, Eugene F. 1969. Politics and Social Conflict in South India: The non-Brahman movement and Tamil separatism, 1916–1929. Berkeley: University of California Press.
1994. Dialogue and History: Constructing South India, 1795–1895. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Jaffrelot, Christophe. 1995. “The Idea of the Hindu Race in the Writings of Hindu Nationalist Ideologues in the 1920s and 1930s: A concept between two cultures”. The Concept of Race in South Asia ed. by Peter Robb, 327–354. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
. 2000. Dr. Ambedkar: Leader intouchable et père de la constitution indienne. Paris: Presses de Sciences.
Juergensmeyer, Mark. 1982. Religion as Social Vision: The movement against untouchability in 20th century Punjab. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kabis, Johannes. 1900. “Bewegung unter den Pariahs im Landbezirke von Madras”. Jahrbuch der sächsischen Missionskonferenz (Leipzig) 131.69–92.
Kavlekar, Kasinath K. 1979. Non-Brahmin Movement in South India 1873–1949. Kolhapur: Shivaji University Press.
Khare, R. S. 1984. The Untouchable as Himself. Ideology, identity and pragmatism among the Lucknow Chamars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
King, Richard. 1999. Orientalism and Religion: Postcolonial theory, India and “The Mystic East”. London: Routledge.
Klimkeit, Hans-Joachim. 1981. Der politische Hinduismus: Indische Denker zwischen religiöser Reform und politischem Erwachen. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
Kohl, Philip L. & Clare Fawcett, eds. 1995. Nationalism, Politics and the Practice of Archeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Krishnaswami Aiyangar, S. 1923. Some Contributions of South India to Indian Culture. Calcutta: University of Calcutta.
Lal, Braj Basi. 1997. The Earliest Civilisation of South Asia. New Delhi: Aryan Books International.
Leopold, Joan. 1970. “The Aryan Theory of Race in India”. The Indian Economic and Social History Review (Delhi) 71.271–297.
. 1974. “Britische Anwendungen der arischen Rassentheorie auf Indien 1850–1870”. Saeculum (Freiburg) 251.386–411.
. 1987. “Ethnic Stereotypes in Linguistics: The case of Friedrich Max Müller (1847–51)”. Papers in the History of Linguistics ed. by Hans Aarsleff, Louis G. Kelly & Hans-Josef Niederehe (=
Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 38), 501–512. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Lübbe, Hermann. 1977. Geschichtsbegriff und Geschichtsinteresse: Analytik und Pragmatik der Historie. Basel: Schwabe.
Maraimalai Adigal. n.d. [1941]. “English Preface to the Tamilian Creed”. Maraimalai Adikal. Father of the Tamil Renaissance ed. by N. N. Singapore: EVS Enterprises.
Maraimalai Adigal [Maṟaimalai Aṭikaḷ]. 1958 [1923]. Vēḷāḷar nākarikam [Vellalar Civilization]. Tirunelveli: The Tirunelveli South India Saiva Siddhanta Works Publishing Society.
. 1999 [1941]. Tamiḻar matam [Religion of the Tamils]. Ceṉṉai: Maiṇivācakar patippakam. [Without the original English Preface.]
Massey, James. 1995. Da its in India: Re igion as a source ofbondage or liberation with special reference to Christians. New Delhi: Manohar.
Maw, Martin. 1990. Visions of India: Fulfilment theology, the Aryan race theory, and the work of British Protestant missionaries in Victorian India. (=
Studien zur interkulturellen Geschichte des Christentums, 57.). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
McKean, Lise. 1996. Divine Enterprise: Gurus and the Hindu nationalist movement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Misra, Satya Swarup. 1992. The Aryan Problem: A linguistic approach. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal.
Müller, Friedrich Max. 1848 [1847]. “On the Relation of the Bengali and the Arian and Aboriginal Languages of India”. Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science (London) 171.319–350.
Nallasami Pillai, J. M. & V. V. Ramanan, eds. 1897–1914. The Light of Truth or the Siddhanta Deepika (and Agamic Review). 141 vols. Madras: Siddhanta Deepika.
Nambi Arooran, K. 1976. Tamil Renaissance and Dravidian Nationalism, 1905–1944, with special reference to the work of Maraimalai Atikal. Dissertation, University of London.
Nehring, Andreas. 2000. “Kanonisierung des Anderen: Die Übersetzung des Tirukural durch deutsche Missionare im 19. Jahrhundert”. Verstehen und Übersetzen: Beiträge vom Missionstheologischen Symposion, Hermannsburg 1999 ed. by Wolfgang Günther (=
V
ision Mission, Beihefte, 1), 67–86. Hermannsburg: Verlag der Missionshandlung.
O’Hanlon, Rosalind. 1985. Caste, Conflict and Ideology: Mahatma Jotirao Phule and Low Caste Protest in Nineteenth-Century Western India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 1988. “Recovering the Subject: Subaltern studies and histories of resistance in Colonial South Asia”. Modern Asian Studies. Cambridge. 221.189–224.
Omvedt, Gail. 1976. Cultural Revolt in a Colonial Society: The Non Brahman Movement in Western India 1873–1930. Bombay: Scientific Socialist Education Trust.
Pandian, M. S. S. 1995. “Beyond Colonial Crumbs: Cambridge school, identity politics and Dravidian movement(s)”. Economic and Political Weekly (Bombay) Nr.7, 18–25 Feb. 1995, 385–391.
Panikkar, K. N. 2001. “Outsider as Enemy. The politics of rewriting history in India”. Frontline (Chennai) 18:1, 19 Jan. 2001, 73–78.
Phule, Jotirao Govindrao. 1991. Collected Works of Mahatma Jotirao Phule. 21 vols. Bombay: Education Department, Government of Maharshtra, Mantralaya.
Rajaram, Navaratna S. 1993. Aryan Invasion of India. The myth and the truth. New Delhi: Voice of India.
1995. The Politics of History: Aryan invasion theory and the subversion of scholarship. New Delhi: Voice of India.
Rajaram, Navaratna S. & David Frawley. 1995. Vedic “Aryans” and the Origins of Civilisation: A literary and scientific perspective. Quebec: W. H. Press. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Voice of India, 1997.)
Ramanathan, P. 1998. A New Account of the History and Culture of the Tamils. Chennai: The Tirunelveli South India Saiva Siddhanta Works Publishing Society.
Ramasami, E. V. [Tantai Periyar]. 1992 [1948]. Tiraviṭar – ariyar uṇmai [Dravidian – Aryan Truth]. 9th ed. Ceṉṉai: Periyār cuyamariyātai piraccāra niṟuvaṉa veḷiyīṭu.
. 1996. Tamiḻar, tamiḻnāṭu, tamiḻar paṇpāṭu [Tamils, Tamil Nation, Tamil Culture]. Ceṉṉai: Tirāviṭar kaḻaka veḷiyīṭu.
Ramaswamy, Sumathi. 1997. Passions of the Tongue: Language devotion in Tamil India, 1891–1970. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Raychaudhuri, Tapan. 1988. Europe Reconsidered: Perceptions of the West in 19th-century Bengal. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Ryerson, Charles A. 1988. Regionalism and Religion: The Tamil renaissance and popular Hinduism. (=
Series on Religion, 27.) Madras: The Christian Literature Society.
Savarkar, Vinayak Damodar. 1989 [1923]. Hindutva: Who is a Hindu? 6th ed. Bombay: Veer Savarkar Prakashan.
Sethna, K. D. 1992 [1980]. The Problem of Aryan Origins. From an Indian Point of View. Second Extensively Enlarged Edition with Five Supplements. New Delhi: Aditya Prakashan.
Seunarine, J. F. 1977. Reconversion to Hinduism through Suddhi. Madras: Christian Literature Society.
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1985. “Subaltern Studies: Deconstructing historiography”. Subaltern Studies (Delhi) 41.330–363.
Srinivasa Aiyangar, M. 1914. Tamil Studies, or, Essays on the history of the Tamil people, language, religion and literature. Madras: Guardian Press.
Subramanian, Narendra. 1999. Ethnicity and Populist Mobilization: Political parties, citizens and democracy in South India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Swaminatha Iyer, U. V. 1994 [1990]. The Story of My Life. Translated into English by K. V. Zvelebil. 21 vols. Chennai: Institute of Asian Studies.
Talageri, Shrikant. 1993b. The Aryan Invasion Theory and Indian Nationalism. New Delhi: Voice of India.
. 1996. “The Theory of Aryan Race and India. History of Politics”. Social Scientist. Trivandrum 24:1/3.3–29.
Theertha, Swami Dharma. 1992 [1941]. History of Hindu Imperialism. Madras: Dalit Education Literature Centre.
Thiruvasagam, A. & Surata Kalladan [A. Tiruvācakan & Kallāṭaṉ Curatā], eds. 1993. Pāratitācaṉ kavitaikaḷ. Pāvēntar pāṭalkaḷiṉ muḻutokuppu [Poems of Bharati Dasan]. Ceṉṉai: Aruḷ – cuṭar patippakam.
Thurston, Edgar & Kadambi Rangachari. 1909. Castes and Tribes ofSouthern India. 71 vols. Madras: Government Press.
Tiruvenkatam, T. [Tōppūr. Tiruvēṅkaṭam]. 1998. Tirāviṭa iḷaiñarkaḷē [Hey, Dravidian Youth!]. Vēlūr: Teṉpulam patippakam.
Vasantan, M. [Mañcai. Vacantaṉ]. 1998. Pārppaṉa tantiraṅkaḷ [Guiles of the Brahmans]. Ceṉṉinattam: Puraṭcikkaṉal veḷiyīṭu.
Veer, Peter van der. 1994. Religious Nationalism: Hindus and Muslims in India. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Venkatachalapathy, A. R. 1995. “Dravidian Movement and Saivites: 1927–1944”. Economic and Political Weekly (Bombay). Nr. 14, 8. April 1995, 761–768.
Vivekananda, Swami. 1992 [1991]. The Complete Works of Swami Vivekananda. Mayavati Memorial edition. Calcutta: Advatia Ashrama.
Viyogi, Naval. 1995. The Founders of Indus Valley Civilization and Their Later History. (= The History of Indigenous People of India, 1.) Ludhiana: Indian National Historical Research Council.
Washbrook, David. 1976. The Emergence of Provincial Politics. The Madras presidency 1870–1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Witzel, Michael. 2001. “Autochthonous Aryans? The evidence from Old Indian and Iranian texts”. Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies. [URL]. 7:3.1–93.
Witzel, Michael & Steve Farmer. 2000a. “New Evidence on the ‘Piltdown Horse’ Hoax”. Frontline (Chennai) 17, Nr. 23, 24 Nov. 2000, 126–129.
. 2000b. “Horseplay in Harappa. The Indus Valley decipherment hoax”. Frontline 17, Nr. 19, 13 Oct. 2000, 4–14.
Zelliot, Eleanor. 1970. “Mahar and the Non-Brahmin Movement in Maharashtra”. Indian Economic and Social History Review. Delhi. 7,3.397–415.
Cited by (10)
Cited by ten other publications
Leonard, Dickens
Cháirez-Garza, Jesús F.
Gross, Tori
Binder, Stefan
Dandekar, Deepra
Dandekar, Deepra
Bornet, Philippe
Grünendahl, Reinhold
[no author supplied]
2020.
Pour une historiographie engagée; or where
historians of linguistics could still do better. In Last Papers in Linguistic Historiography [Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 128], ► pp. 37 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
