Cover not available

Article published In: Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 27:1 (2000) ► pp.103126

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (54)
Références bibliographiques
Allerton, David J. 1995. “Valency Grammar”. Concise History of Language Sciences: From the Sumerians to the Cognitivists éd. par E. F. K. Koerner & R. E. Asher, 280–289. Oxford & New York: Pergamon Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anderson, John M. & Colin J. Ewen. 1987. Principles of Dependency Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anderson, John M. & Charles Jones. 1977. Phonological Structure and the History of English. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arrivé, Michel. 1969. “Les éléments de syntaxe structurale de Lucien Tesnière”. Langue française 101.36–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bally, Charles. 1932. Linguistique générale et linguistique française. Berne: A. Francke.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baum, Richard. 1976. “Dependenzgrammatik”: Tesnière Modell der Sprachbe-schreibung in wissenschaftsgeschichtlicher und kritischer Sicht. Tubingue: Max Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bechraoui, Mohamed Fadhel. 1992. “La syntaxe de Tesnière: Analyse méta-théorique”. Linguisticae Investigationes 16:1.1–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile. 1960. Compte rendu de Tesnière (1959). Bulletin de la Société de linguistique de Paris 55:2.20–23.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. “Categories and Transformation”. The Minimalist Program par N. Chomsky, 219–394. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William. 1996. “What’s a Head?”. Phrase Structure and the Lexicon éd. par Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring, 35–75. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Damourette, Jacques & Édouard Pinchon. 1930. Des mots à la pensée: Essai de grammaire de la langue française. Paris: d’Artrey.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Danilenko, Valerij. 1988. “On the Relation between Subject-Centred and Predicate-Centred Theories of Sentence-Forming (V. Mathesius and L. Tesnière)”. Philologica Pragensis 311 30–36.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ducretet-Bol, Marie Paule. 1978. “Analyse comparative et critique de Togeby et Tesnière”. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics 231.1–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dumas, François. 1952. “L’oeuvre linguistique de Lucien Tesnière”. Orbis 11.553–564.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1968. “The Case for Case”. Universals in Linguistic Theory éd. par Emmon Bach & Robert T. Harms, 1–88. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fink, R. Stefan. 1977. “Case Grammar and Valence Theory at a Stalemate? Their Relevance for Semantic Memory”. Valence, Semantic Case and Grammatical Relations. éd. par Werner Abraham, 177–188. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, Norman M. 1994. “Dependency Grammar”. The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics éd. par R. E. Asher & J. M. Y. Simpson, Vol II1, 860–864. Oxford & New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gaifman, Haïm. 1965. “Dependency Systems and Phrase Structure Systems”. Information and Control 81.304–337. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garde, Paul. 1977. “Ordre linéaire et dépendance syntaxique: Contribution à une typologie”. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 72:1.1–26.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gréciano, Gertrud. 1991. “Valence, version intégrée”. Information grammaticale 501.13–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. “Some Universals of Grammar with particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements”. Universals of Language ed. par J. H. Greenberg, 58–90. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1974. Language Typology: A survey and analytic overview. La Haye: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gruber, Jeffrey S. 1965. Studies in Lexical Relations. Thèse de doctorat, MIT. (Version revue, Lexical Structures in Syntax and Semantics. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1976.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guiraud, Pierre. 1971. “Lucien Tesnière and the Transformational Grammar”. Language Sciences No.15.1–6.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Happ, Heinz. 1977. Dependenz-Grammatik und Latein-Unterricht. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1978. “Syntaxe latine et théorie de la valence: Essai d’adaptation au latin des théories de Lucien Tesnière”. Langages No.50.51–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hays, David G. 1964. “Dependency Theory: A formalism and some observations”. Language 401.511–525. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hiersche, Rolf. 1979. “Les ‘précurseurs’ allemands de Lucien Tesnière”. Information grammaticale 31.24–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hirtle, Walter H. 1973. “Structure du mot et structure syntaxique”. Grammaire générative et transformationnelle et psychomécanique du langage éd. par André Joly, 13–27. Lille: Éditions Universitaires.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holtus, Günter. 1980. “Les ‘Eléments de syntaxe structurale’ de Lucien Tesnière: Remarques sur la réception de son modèle de grammaire dépendantielle”. Revue romane 15:1.128–145.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hudson, Richard. 1987. “Zwicky on Heads”. Journal of Linguistics 231.109–132. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1995. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kitahara, Hisatsugu. 1994. Target: A unified theory of movement and structure building. Thèse de doctorat, Université Harvard, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, Robert. 1980. “Théories linguistiques”. Les sciences du langage en France au XXème siècle éd. par Bernard Pottier, 535–575. Paris: SELAF.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mel’ãuk, Igor A. 1979. Studies in Dependency Syntax. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1981. “Types de dépendance syntagmatique entre les mots-formes d’une phrase”. Bulletin de la Société de linguistique de Paris 76:1.1–59.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mignot, Xavier. 1991. “Ordre des mots, linéarité du langage et structures syntaxiques. Bulletin de la Société de linguistique de Paris 86:1.1–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milner, Jean-Claude. 1989. Introduction à une science du langage. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Posner, Rebecca. 1970. “Thirty Years On”. An Introduction to Romance Linguistics, nouvelle éd. de Iorgu Iordan & John Orr, 524–527. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robins, Robert Henry. 1961. “Syntactic Analysis”. Archivum Linguisticum 131.78–89.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robinson, Jane J. 1970. “Dependency Structures and Transformational Rules”. Language 46:2.259–285. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruwet, Nicolas. 1968. Introduction à la grammaire générative. Paris: Librairie Plon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schank, Roger C. 1969. “Conceptual Dependency as a Framework for Linguistic Analysis”. Linguistics No.49.28–50.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schank, Roger C. & Larry G. Tesler. 1970. “A Conceptual Dependency Parser for Natural Language”. Statistical Methods in Linguistics (Stockholm) 61.35–51.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Serbat, Guy. 1981. Cas et fonctions. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sgall, Petr & Jarmila Panevova. 1989. “Dependency Syntax as a Challenge”. Theoretical Linguistics 15:1/2.73–86.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sheldon, Klein & Robert F. Simmons. 1963. “Syntactic Dependency and the Computer Generation of Coherent Discourse”. Mechanical Translation 71.50–61.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tesnière, Lucien. 1959. Eléments de syntaxe structurale. Éd. avec une préface de Jean Fourquet. Paris: Klincksieck. (2e éd., 1966.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ura, Hiroyuki. 1996. Multiple-Checking: A theory of grammatical function splitting. Doctoral dissertation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vater, Heinz. 1977. “On the Possibility of Distinguishing between Complements and Adjuncts”. Valence, Semantic Case and Grammatical Relations éd. par Werner Abraham, 21–45. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1973. Towards a Generative Dependency Grammar. Reproduced by Linguistic Agency University at Trier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vergnaud, Jean-Roberge. 1985. Dépendances et niveaux de représentation en syntaxe. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Worthington, Martha Garrett. 1968. “A Precursor of the Transformational Approach to Descriptive Syntax: Lucien Tesnière”. Romance Philology 211.303–317.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. 1985. “Heads”. Journal of Linguistics 211.1–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Valentina Chepiga
2017. L’œuvre comme processus. In L’œuvre comme processus,  pp. 221 ff. DOI logo
Tesnière, Lucien, Timothy Osborne & Sylvain Kahane

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue