Article published In: Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 20:2/3 (1993) ► pp.399–440
The origin and developmemt of generative semantics
Published online: 1 January 1993
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.20.2-3.07har
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.20.2-3.07har
Summary
Against the background of the controversial and polarized work of Frederick Newmeyer and Robin Tolmach Lakoff, this paper chronicles the early development of generative semantics, an internal movement within the transformational model of Chomsky’s Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. The first suggestions toward the movement, whose cornerstone was the obliteration of the syntax-semantics boundary, were by George Lakoff in 1963. But it was the work conducted under the informal banner of “Abstract Syntax” by Paul Postal that began the serious investigations leading to such an obliteration. Lakoff was an active participant in that research, as were Robin Tolmach Lakoff, John Robert (“Háj”) Ross and James D. McCawley. Through their combined efforts, particularly those of McCawley on semantic primitives and lexical insertion, generative semantics took shape in 1967: positing a universal base, importing notions from predicate calculus, decomposing lexical structure, and, most contentiously, rejecting the central element of the Aspects model, deep structure.
Résumé
Dans l’optique des ouvrages controversés et polarisés de Frederick Newmeyer et Robin Tolmach Lakoff, cet article retrace les débuts de la sémantique générative, un mouvement issu du modèle transformationel de Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. de Noam Chomsky. Les premières impulsions vers ce mouvement, qui eut pour pierre angulaire l’abolition des frontières entre la syntaxe et la sémantique, furent données par George Lakoff en 1963. Ce fut, cependant, le travail de Paul Postal, dirigé sous l’emblème de ‘syntaxe abstraite’, qui engendra les recherches sérieuses menant à une telle abolition. Lakoff s’avéra un participant actif, ainsi que Robin Tolmach Lakoff, John Robert (“Háj”) Ross et James D. McCawley. Par leurs efforts conjoints, pariculièrement ceux de McCawley au sujet de ‘semantic primitives’ et ‘lexical insertion’, la sémantique générative prit forme en 1967: la supposition d’une base universelle, l’adoption de notions empruntées au calcul des prédicats, la décomposition de la structure lexicale et – objet de la plus grande controverse – le rejet de l’élément central du modèle de Aspects, la ‘structure profonde’.
Zusammenfassung
Vor dem Hintergrund der kontroversen und polarisierten Arbeiten von Frederick Newmeyer (1980 u.ö) und Robin Tolmach Lakoff (insbes. 1989), unternimmt der vorliegende Beitrag den Versuch, die frühe Entwicklung der Generativen Semantik nachzuzeichnen, die zunächst nichts weiter als eine Bewegung innerhalb des transformationeilen Modells von Chomskys Aspects of the Theory of Syntax war. Die ersten Anstöße hierzu, deren Eckpfeiler die Tilgung der Grenze zwischen Syntax und Semantik war, kamen von George Lakoff im Jahr 1963. Aber es waren Arbeiten von Paul Postal unter dem Zeichen ‘abstrakte Syntax’, die zu ernsthaften Untersuchungen und schließlich zur Sprengung der Syntax/Semantik-Grenze führten. Lakoff war ein aktiver Mitarbeiter, genauso wie Robin Tolmach Lakoff, John Robert (“Háj”) Ross und James D. McCawley. Durch ihre vereinten Kräfte, nicht zuletzt anfgrund der Überlegunen von McCawley zu ‘semantic primitives’ und ‘lexical insertion’, nahm die Generative Semantik i.J. 1967 Gestalt an: Annahme einer universalen Basis, Hineinahme von Erkenntnissen aus der Prädikationsrechnung, Zergliederung der lexikalischen Struktur, und – wohl besonders kontrovers – Verwerfung des zentralen Angelpunkts des Aspects-Modells, der sog. ‘Tiefenstruktur’.
References (163)
*Where relevant, the composition date, in brackets, follows the publication date.
Anderson, Stephen R. 1976 [1966]. “Concerning the Notion ‘Base Component of a Transformational Grammar’”. McCawley 1976a. 113–128.
Bach, Emmon & Robert T. Harms, eds. 1968. Universals in Linguistic Theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Beach, Woodford A., et al., eds. 1977. Papers from the Thirteenth Regional Chicago Linguistics Society Meeting. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.
Bever, Thomas G. & Peter S[tephen] Rosenbaum. 1970. “Some Lexical Structures and Their Empirical Validity”. Jacobs & Rosenbaum 1970.3–19.
Bierwisch, Manfred & Karl Erich Heidolph, eds. 1970. Progress in Linguistics: A collection of papers. The Hague: Mouton.
Brame, Michael K. 1976. Conjectures and Refutations in Syntax and Semantics. New York: North-Holland.
. 1970[1968]. Generative Satzsemantik und transformationeile Syntax im System der englischen Nominalkomposition. München: Wilhelm Fink.
. 1978. Generative Satzsemantik im System der englischen Nominalkomposition. München: Wilhelm Fink. [= 2nd ed. of Brekle 1970.]
Carden, Guy. 1968a. “A Note on None
”. Aiken Computation Laboratory Technical Report NSF-20-X:1-3. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ.
1970b. A Semantically Based Sketch of Onondaga. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Publications in Anthropology and Linguistics.
. 1966. Cartesian Linguistics: A chapter in the history of rationalist thought. New York & London: Harper & Row.
. 1975[1955–1956; preface dated 1973]. The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory. New York: Plenum.
. 1982 [1979–80]. The Generative Enterprise: A discussion with Riny Huybregts and Henk van Riemsdijk. Dordrecht: Foris.
Corum, Claudia, et al., eds. 1973. Papers from the Ninth Regional Chicago Linguistic Society Meeting. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Culicover, Peter, Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajian, eds. 1977. Formal Syntax. New York: Academic Press.
Dinneen, Francis P., S.J., ed. 1966. Report of the 17th Annual Round Table Meeting on Linguistics and Language Studies [GURT 1966]. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown Univ. Press.
Dougherty, Ray C. 1970. “Recent Studies on Language Universals”. Foundations of Language 61.505–561.
1974. “Generative Semantic Methods: A Bloomfieldian conter-revolution”. International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics 31.255–286.
Dowty, David R. 1979. Word Meaning in Montague Grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in generative semantics and Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Fillmore, Charles J[ohn], & D. Terrence Langendoen, eds. 1971. Studies in Linguistic Semantics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Fodor, Jerry A[lvin], & Jerrold J[acob] Katz, eds. 1964. The Structure of Language. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Frantz, Donald [Gene]. 1974. Generative Semantics: An introduction. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Linguistic Club.
Fujimura, Osamu, ed. 1973. Three Dimensions of Linguistic Theory. Tokyo: Tokyo Institute for Advanced Studies of Language.
Greenberg, Joseph H[arold], ed. 1963. Universals of Language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. (2nd ed.,1966.)
Gruber, Jeffrey S[teven]. 1976[1965, 1967]. Lexical Structures in Syntax and Semantics . New York: North-Holland. [Original titles: “Studies in lexical relations” and “Functions of the lexicon in formal descriptive grammars”.]
Hall, Robert A. Jr. 1987. Linguistics and Pseudo-Linguistics: Selected essays, 1965–1985. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Harris, Randy Allen. 1990. The Life and Death of Generative Semantics. Ph.D. dissertation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, N.Y.
. Forthcoming. The Linguistics Wars: Chomsky, generative semantics, and the rhetoric of science. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
Hayes, Curtis W., Jacob Ornstein & William W. Gage. 1977. ABCs of Languages and Linguistics: A practical primer to language sciences in today’s world. The new, revised, and expanded ed. Silver Spring, Md.: The Institute of Modern Languages.
Hill, Archibald A[nderson]. 1991[1974–76]. “The Linguistic Society of America and North American Linguistics, 1950–1968”. HL 181.49–152.
Householder, Fred W[alter], Jr. 1970. “Reviewer’s Reply [to Robin Tolmach Lakoff]”. Language Sciences No. 10.35–36.
Huck, Geoffrey J. & John Goldsmith. Forthcoming. The Deep Structure Debates.
Jackendoff, Ray S. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Jacobs, Roderick A. & Peter S[tephen] Rosenbaum, eds. 1970. Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown Univ. Press.
Joos, Martin, ed. 1957. Readings in Linguistics: The development of descriptive linguistics in America since 1925. Washington, D.C.: American Council of Learned Societies.
Katz, Jerrold J[acob], & Jerry A. Fodor. 1964[1963]. “The Structure of a Semantic Theory”. Fodor & Katz 1964.479–518.
Katz, Jerrold J[acob], & Paul M[artin]. Postal. 1964. An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Kiparsky, [René] Paul [Viktor] & Carol Kiparsky. 1970[1967]. “Fact”. Bierwisch & Heidolph 1970. 143–173.
Koerner, E. F. Konrad, ed. 1991. First Person Singular II: Autobiographies by North American Scholars in the language sciences (=
Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 61.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Kuiper, Koenraad. 1975. “Discussion of Ray C. Dougherty’s ‘Generative Semantics Methods: A Bloomfieldian counterrevolution’”. International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics 41.159–161.
. 1970 [1965; degree awarded, 1966]. Irregularity in Syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. [Original (dissertation) title: “On the nature of syntactic irregularity”.]
. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George & John Robert [Háj] Ross. 1976[1967]. “Is Deep Structure Necessary?” McCawley 1976a.159–614.
Lakoff, Robin [Tolmach]. 1968. Abstract Syntax and Latin Complementation. (=
Research monograph, 49.) Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
. 1969. Review of Grammaire genérale et raisonnée (Lancelot & Arnauld 1966[1676]). Language 451.343–364.
. 1989. “The Way We Were; or, the Real Actual Truth about Generative Semantics: A memoir”. Journal of Pragmatics 131.939–988.
Lancelot of Benwick [= Robert I. Binnick], Morgan le Fay [= Jerry L. Morgan] & The Green Knight [= Georgia Green]. 1976[1968]. “Camelot, 1968”. McCawley 1976a.249–274.
Lees, Robert B. 1968[1960; with prefaces dated 1962, 1964, and 1965]. The Grammar of English Nominalizations. 5th printing. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.
1970b[1967]. “Problems in the Grammatical Analysis of English Nominal Compounds”. Bierwisch & Heidolph 1970.174–186.
Lunt, Horace G., ed. 1964. The Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguists. The Hague: Mouton.
McCawley, James D[avid]. 1968[1965]. The Phonological Component of a Grammar of Japanese. The Hague: Mouton.
, ed. 1976a. Notes from the Linguistic Underground. (=
Syntax and Semantics, 7.) New York: Academic Press.
. In press. “Generative Semantics”. The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford & New York: Pergamon.
Moravcsik, Edith A. & Jessica R. Wirth, eds. 1980. Current Approaches to Syntax. (=
Syntax and Semantics, 13.) New York: Academic Press.
Muntz, Jim. 1972. “Reflections of the Development of Transformational Theories”. Plötz 1972.251–274.
Murray, Stephen O. 1981. Review of Newmeyer (1980a). HL 8.1.107–111.
Newmeyer, Frederick J[aret]. 1980a. Linguistic Theory in America: The First Quarter-century of Transformational Generative Grammar. New York: Academic Press.
. 1980b. “A Reply to James McCawley’s Review of Linguistic Theory in America [= Newmeyer 1980a]”. Linguistics 181.931–937.
. 1988. “Bloomfield, Jakobson, Chomsky, and the Roots of Generative Grammar”. Manuscript of a paper delivered at The First Annual Meeting of the North American Association for the History of the Language Sciences (NAAHoLS), New Orleans, La., Dec. 1988.
. 1991. “Rules and Principles in the Historical Development of Generative Syntax”. Kasher 1991.200–230.
Palermo, David, & Walter Weimar, eds. 1974. Cognition and the Symbolic Processes. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Peranteau, Paul M. et al., eds. 1972. Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Plötz, Senta, ed. 1972. Transformational Analysis: The transformational theory of Zellig Harris and its development. Frankfurt: Athenäum.
Postal, Paul M[artin]. 1964. “Underlying and Superficial Structure”. Harvard Educational Review 341.246–266.
. 1988. “Topic … Comment: Advances in linguistic rhetoric”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 61.129–137.
Ross, John Robert [“Háj”]. 1969[1967]. “Auxiliaries as Main Verbs”. Studies in Philosophical Linguistics 11.77–102.
. 1986[1967]. Infinite Syntax! Norwood: ABLEX Publishing. [Original (dissertation) title: “Constraints on Variables in Syntax”.]
Ruwet, Nicolas. 1991 [1982–89]. Syntax and Human Experience. Ed. and transl. by John Goldsmith. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
Sapir, Edward. 1949[1921]. Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.
Schiller, Eric, Barbara Need, Douglas Varley & William H. Eilfort. 1988. The Best of CLS: A selection of out-of-print papers from 1968 to 1975. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.
Sgall, Petr, Eva Hajicová & Eva Benecová. 1973. Topic, Focus, and Generative Semantics. Kronberg/Taunus: Athenäum.
Steinberg, Danny D. & Leon A. Jakobovits, eds. 1971. Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Tolmach Lakoff, see Lakoff, Robin [Tolmach].
Vroman, William Viera. 1976. Predicate Raising and the Syntax-Morphology-Semantics Cycle: Latin and Portuguese. Unpub. Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Zwicky, Arnold M., Peter H. Salus, Robert I. Binnick & Anthony L. Vanek, eds. 1970. Studies out in Left Field: Defamatory Essays Presented to James D. McCawley. (=
Current Inquiry into Language and Linguistics, 4.) Edmonton: Linguistic Research. (Repr, with a new foreword by Regna Darnell, Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1992.)
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Kertész, András
Joseph, John E.
Koerner, E.F. Konrad
Nevin, Bruce E.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
