Cover not available

Article published In: Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 2:1 (1975) ► pp.25–47

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Early Scholastic Views on Ambiguity

Composition and Division

 | University of Ottawa
Published online: 1 January 1975
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.2.1.03riv
Summary
This article presents a linguistic study of a number of 12th-century logical tracts with respect to their views on fallacies of composition and division. It will be seen that early Scholastic work done in this area was greatly influenced by certain syntactic properties of Latin.
The correlation between meaning and syntactic order came to preoccupy logicians upon the rediscovery and subsequent translation of Aristotle’s De Sophisticis Elenchis at the beginning of the 12th century. Some logicians of the period felt that a composite syntactic order correlated obligatorily with a composite sense; others thought that order and sense could be independent from each other, and that, consequently, a composite syntactic order could have two readings, a composite one and a divided one. A third opinion expressed was that certain syntactic orders received two interpretations, one considered to be normal (a composite order correlating preferentially with a composite sense), and another one regarded as secondary (the possibility for a composite order to be understood in a divided sense as well).
The ideas which found expression in the 12th century manuscripts discussed in this study influenced logical speculation throughout the Scholastic period.
References (36)
References
Bocheński, Innocentius M(aria). 1961, A History of Formal Logic. Transl. and ed. by Ivo Thomas. Notre Dame, Ind.: Univ. of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bursill-Hall, G(eoffrey) L(eslie) 1971. Speculative Grammars of the Middle Ages: The doctrine of partes orationis of the Modistae, The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf (1891–1970). 1947. Meaning and Necessity: A study in semantics and modal logic. Chicago, Ill.: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, Morris R(aphael), and Ernest Nagel. 1934. An Introduction to Logic and Scientific Method. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Copi, Irving M. 1953. Introduction to Logic. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frege, (Friedrich Ludwig) Gottlob (1848–1925). 1970 [1892]. “On Sense and Reference” [Ueber Sinn und Bedeutung]. Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege ed. by Peter Geach and Max Black, 56–78. Oxford: B. Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamblin, Charles L. 1970. Fallacies. London: Methuen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hintikka, Jaakko. 1969. “Semantics for Proportional Attitudes”. Philosophical Logic ed. by J. W. Davis, et al., 21–45. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kneale, William, and Martha Kneale. 1962. The Development of Logic. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Repr., 1968)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Stanley Peters. 1966. “Phrasal Conjunction and Symmetric Predicates”. Report No. NSF-17 to the National Science Foundation VI1. 1–49. Cambridge, Mass.: Computational Laboratory, Harvard Univ.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCawley, James D. 1971. “Where Do Noun Phrases Come from?”. Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology ed. by Danny D(avid) Steinberg and Leon A. Jakobovits, 217–31. London:. Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Minio-Paluello, Lorenzo. 1952. “Iacobus Veneticus Graecus – canonist and translator of Aristotle”. Traditio 81.265–304. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moody, Ernest A(ddison) 1965. “Buridan and a Dilemma of Nominalism”. Harry Austryn Wolfson Jubilee Volume II1, 577–96. Jerusalem: Kraus Reprint.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J. 1969. English Aspectual Verbs. (= Studies in Linguistics and Language Learning 6.) Seattle: Univ. of Washington.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1970. “The ‘Root Modal’: Can it be transitive? ”. Studies Presented to Robert B. Lees by his Students ed. by Jerrold M. Sadock and Anthony L(adislav) Vanek, 189–96. Edmonton, Alberta: Linguistic Research.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Donnell, J. Reginald, ed. 1941. “The Syncategoremata of William of Sherwood”. Medieval Studies 31.46–93. (For E. version, see William of Sherwood 1968.) Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paul of Pergula [Paulus Pergulensis (d.1451)]. 1961. Logica and Tractatus de sensu composito et diviso. Ed. by Sister Mary Anthony Brown. St. Bonaventura N.Y.: Franciscan Institute.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peter of Spain [Petrus Hispanus (c.1210–1277)]. 1964. Tractatus syncategor-ematum and Selected Anonymous Treatises. Transl. by Joseph P(atrick) Mullally. Milwaukee, Wis.: Marquette Univ. Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinborg, Jan. 1967. Die Entwicklung der Sprachtheorie im Mittelalter. (= Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie und Theologie des Mittelalters, 42:2.) Münster: Aschendorff; Copenhagen: Frost-Hansen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1972. Logik und Semantik im Mittelalter. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Fromman-Holzboog.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quine, W(illard) V(an) O(rman). 1951. Mathematical Logic. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1953. “Reference and Modality”. From a Logical Point of View: 9 logico-philosophical essays by W. V. O. Quine, 139–59. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1960. Word and Object. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1966. “Quantifiers and Prepositional Attitudes”. The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays by W. V. O. Quine, 183–94. New York: Random House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rijk, L(ambertus) M(arie) de. 1962–1967. Logica modernorum: A contribution to the history of early terminist logic. 2 vols, in 3. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rivero, María-Luisa. 1973. “Antecedents of Contemporary Logical and Linguistic Analyses in Scholastic Logic”. FL 101.55–64.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1974a. “Modalities and Scope in Scholastic Logic from a Linguistic Point of View”. AL 15:2.133–52.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1974b. “La ambigüedad de los verbos modales: Una visión histórica”. To appear.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robins, R(obert) H(enry) 1951. Ancient and Medieval Grammatical Theory in Europe, with particular reference to modern linguistic doctrine. London: G. Bell & Sons. (Repr., Port Washington, N.Y. & London: Kennikat Press, 1971.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1967. A Short History of Linguistics. London: Longmans. (2nd printing, 1970.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand (Arthur William, 3rd Earl, 1872–1970). 1940. An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sosa, Ernest. 1970. “Propositional Attitudes De dicto and De re ”. Journal of Philosophy 671.883–96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomas Aquinas, Saint (1225–74). 1940. [De propositionibus modalibus] “Sancti Thomae Aquinatis de modalibus opusculum et doctrina”. Ed. by I. M. Bocheński. Angelicum 171.180–218.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
William of Sherwood [Guilelmus Shirwodus (fl. 1260)]. 1937. Die Introdutiones in logicam des Wilhelm von Shyreswood. Ed. by Martin Grabmann (1875–1949). Munich: Bayerische Akad. der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(fl. 1260)]. 1966. William of Sherwood’s Introduction to Logic. Transl. by Norman Kretzmann. Minneapolis, Minn.: Univ. of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
William of Sherwood [Guilelmus Shirwodus (fl. 1260)]. 1968. William of Sherwood’s Treatise on Syncategorematic Words. Transl. by Norman Kretzmann. Minneapolis, Min.: Univ. of Minnesota Press. (See O’Donnell 1941 for Lat. ed.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Koerner, Konrad
1980. Medieval Linguistic Thought. Historiographia Linguistica 7:1-2 ► pp. 265 ff. DOI logo
Rivero, María Luisa
1976. William of Sherwood on Composition and Division. Historiographia Linguistica 3:1 ► pp. 17 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue