Article published In: Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 18:1 (1991) ► pp.1–48
The first quarter century of the Linguistic Society of America, 19240–1949
Published online: 1 January 1991
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.18.1.03mur
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.18.1.03mur
Summary
The Linguistic Society of America was founded in 1925 by scholars trained in traditional philological methods but more interested in building a science of linguistics than in literary studies. Language, the official journal of the new society became an organ for structural descriptions of sound systems of diverse languages. The Linguistic Institute, a summer training program, speeded diffusion of the new structuralist methods. Focus on native speech rather than on literary texts was a hallmark of the ‘application’ of structuralist linguistics to the teaching of languages in military intensive language programs during the Second World War, and in some academic programs (notably at Cornell University) after the war. After the war Language expanded, and a number of other linguistics journals began publishing. The extent to which these other journals were complements and the extent to which they were rivals remains controversial. Patterns of publications follow lines of theoretical divergence within what is sometimes mistakenly regarded as a neo-Bloomfieldian monolith. It is argued that the self-annuling prestige of the linguistic analyst in the process of language learning contributed to the difficulty of establishing a profession based on ‘the science of language’ in the late 1940s and through the 1950s. The analytical role of native speakers in the Bloomfieldian tradition is contrasted with that in the Sapirian tradition.
Résumé
La Société linguistique d’Amérique (LSA) fut fondée en 1924 par des érudits formés dans les méthodes philologiques traditionnelles mais plus intéressés à la création d’une science linguistique qu’à la consolidation des études littéraires. La revue officielle de la LSA, Language, devenait l’organe pour la description structurale des systèmes des divers langages. Le ‘Linguistic Institute’, un program estival, accélérait la diffusion de cette nouvelle méthode structuraliste. Le centre d’attention était sur les langages parlés plutôt que les textes littéraires; pendant la deuxième guerre mondiale et à certaines universités (notamment à l’Université Cornell) après la guerre, la linguistique structuraliste fut ‘appliquée’ dans des programmes intensifs langagiers et dans l’enseignement des langues étrangères. Après 1945 la revue Language étendait et d’autres revues (Word, Studies in Language, Romance Philology) furent lancées. Cependant, il n’est pas toujours clair s’il y avait beaucoup de rivalité entre elles, même si leurs divergences théoriques contredisent la thèse d’une hégémonie absolue de la position néo-bloomfieldienne. Le prestige auto-effaçant de l’analyste dans le procès de l’apprentissage langagier a contribué à la difficulté dans l’établissement d’une profession à la base d’une ‘science du langage’ vers la fin des années 40 et pendant la décade suivante. Le reste de l’article traite de la différence entre les traditions bloomfieldienne et sapirienne en ce qui tient au rôle analytique du locuteur natif.
References (175)
Akhmanova, Ol’ga S. & Galina Milkael’an. 1969. The Theory of Syntax in Modern Linguistics. The Hague: Mouton.
Andrade, Manuel J. 1936. “Some Questions of Fact and Policy Concerning Phonemes”. Language 121.1–14.
Anderson, Stephen R. 1985. Phonology in the Twentieth Century: Theories of rules and theories of representations. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
Bloch, Bernard. 1943. “The Phonemes of the Tokyo Dialect of Japanese”. Le Maître Phonétique 211.1–5.
. 1950a. “Studies in Colloquial Japanese IV: Phonemics”. Language 281.86–125. (Repr. in Joos 1957:329–348.)
Bloch, Bernard. [and Leonard Bloomfield]. 1942. Outline of Linguistic Analysis. Baltimore: Waverly Press.
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1914. An Introduction to the Study of Language. New York: H. Holt & Co. (Repr., with an introd. by Joseph F. Kess, Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1983.)
. 1926. “A Set of Postulates for the Study of Language”. Language 21.153–164. (Repr. in Joos 1957:26–31, and in Hockett 1987:110–127.)
. 1927. “On Recent work in General Linguistics”. Modern Philology 251.211–230. (Repr. in Hockett 1987:134–135.)
. 1942a. Outline Guide for the Practical Study of Foreign Languages. Baltimore: Linguistic Society of America.
. 1942b. “Linguistics and Reading”. Elementary English Review 191. 125–130. (Repr. in Hockett 1987:255–266.)
. 1943. “Meaning”. Montatshefte für deutschen Untericht 351.101–106. (Repr. in Hockett 1987:271–276.)
. 1944. “Secondary and Tertiary Responses to Language”. Language 201.45–55. (Repr. in Hockett 1987:284–296.)
. 1945. “About Foreign Language Teaching”. Yale Review 341.625–641. (Repr. in Hockett 1987:297–309.)
. 1946. “Twenty-One Years of the Linguistic Society”. Language 221. 1–3. (Repr. in Hockett 1987:311–314.)
Boas, Franz. 1911. “Introduction”. Handbook of American Indian Languages, vol.11, 1–83. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of American Ethnology. (Repr., Lincoln: Univ. of Nebraska Press, 1966.)
Bolling, George Melville. 1937. “Statistics of the Homeric Language and a Queer Bit of Criticism”. Language 131.238–240.
Bright, William O. 1980. “American Linguistics: A Western view”. First Person Singular ed. by Boyd H. Davis & Raymond K. O’Cain, 123–130. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Carroll, John B., ed. 1956. Language, Thought and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf Cambridge, Mass.: Technologist Press.
Chao Yuen-Ren. 1934. “The Non-Uniqueness of Phonemic Solutions of Phonetic Systems”. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology of the Academic Sinica 41.363–97. (Repr. in Joos 1957:38–54.)
. 1977. Chinese Linguist, Phonologist, Composer and Author. Berkeley: Regional Oral History Office (Bancroft Library, Univ. of California).
Cowan, J Milton. 1975. “Peace and War”. LSA Bulletin 481.28–38. (Revised version published in First Person Singular II: Autobiograophies by North American scholars in the language sciences ed. by Konrad Koerner, 69–82. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1991.)
Darnell, Regna D. 1969. The Development of American Anthropology, 1880–1920. Unpubl. Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Pennsylvania.
Esper, Erwin A. 1968. Mentalism and Objectivism in Linguistics: The sources of Leonard Bloomfield’s psychology of language. New York: Elsevier.
Fowler, Catherine S. & Don D. Fowler. 1986. “Edward Sapir, Tony Tillohash and Southern Paiute Studies”. New Perspectives in Language, Culture, and Personality ed. by William Cowan, Michael Foster & Konrad Koerner, 41–65. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
. 1986. Professional Powers: A study of the institutionalization of formal knowledge. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
Fries, Charles C.. 1940a. American English Grammar: The grammatical structure of present-day American English with especial reference to social differences or class dialects. New York: Appleton-Century Company.
1963. “The Bloomfield School”. Trends in American and European Linguistics, 1930–1960 ed. by Christine Mohrmann, Alf Sommerfeit & Joshua Whatmough, 196–224. Utrecht & Antwerp: Spectrum.
Graves, Mortimer, & J. M[ilton] Cowan. 1942. Report of the First Year’s Operation of the Intensive Language Program of the American Council of Learned Societies. Washington: ACLS.
. 1953. “The Application of Linguistics to Language Teaching”. Anthropology Today ed. by Alfred L. Kroeber, 807–818. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press.
1990a. A Life for Language: A biographical memoir of Leonard Bloomfield. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Haugen, Einar. 1951. “Directions in Modern Linguistics”. Language 271.211–222. (Repr. in Joos 1957:357–363.)
Heffner, R[oe]-M[errill] S[ecrist]. 1940. “A Note on Vowel Length in General American Speech”. Language 161.33–47.
Hill, A[rchibald]. A. 1936. “Phonetic and Phonemic Change”. Language 121.15–22. (Repr. in Joos 1957:81–84.)
“How Many Revolutions Can a Linguist Live Through?”. First Person Singular ed. by Boyd H. Davis & Raymond K. O’Cain, 67–76. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hockett, Charles F. 1942. “A System of Descriptive Phonology”. Language 181.3–21. (Repr. in Joos 1957:97–108.)
1951. Review of André Martinet, Phonology as Functional Phonetics (London: Oxford Univ. Press, 1949). Language 271.333–342.
1980. “Preserving the Heritage”. First Person Singular ed. by Boyd H. Davis & Raymond K. O’Cain, 97–107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
1987. “Letters from Bloomfield to Michelson and Sapir”. Leonard Bloomfield: Essays on his life and work ed. by Robert A. Hall, Jr. & Konrad Koerner, 39–60. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Hymes, Dell H. 1981. “
In Vain I Tried to Tell You
”: Essays in Native American Ethnopoetics. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.
Hymes, Dell H. & John Fought. 1975. “American Structuralism”. Current Trends in Linguistics 131.903–1156. The Hague: Mouton. (Separate ed., ibid., 1981.)
. 1957. Readings in Linguistics: The development of descriptive linguistics in America sincel925. Washington, D.C.: American Council of Learned Societies.
. 1986[1976]. Notes on the Development of the Linguistic Society of America, 1924–1950. Ithaca, N.Y.: Linguistica.
Keefer, Louis E. 1988. Scholars in Foxholes: The story of the Army Specialized Training Program in World War II. Jefferson, N.C.: Mcfarland.
Kendall, Patricia. 1964. “Evaluating an Experimental Program in Medical Education”. Innovation in Education ed. by Mathew B. Miles, 343–360. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
Kent, Roland Grubb. 1932. The Sounds of Latin. (=
Language Monograph, 12.) Baltimore: Waverly Press.
Koerner, E. F. K[onrad]. 1970. “Bloomfieldian Linguistics and the Problem of Meaning”. Jahrbuch für Amerikastudien 151.162–183. (Repr. in Koerner, Toward a Historiography of Linguistics, 155–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1978.)
. 1986. “Aux sources de la sociolinguistique [moderne]”. Lingvisticœ Investigationes 101.381–401. (Repr. in K. Koerner, Saussurean Studies / Etudes saussuriennes, 155–174. Geneva: Slatkine, 1988.)
Kroeber, Alfred L. & C. Douglas Chrétien. 1937. “Quantitative Classifications of Indo-European Languages”. Language 131.83–103.
Kroeber, Alfred L. 1939. “Statistical Techniques and Hittite”. Language 161.69–71. Kroeber, Theodora K. 1970. Alfred Kroeber: A personal configuration. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
Krupat, Arnold. 1985. For Those Who Come After: A study of native American autobiography. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
Kurath, Hans. 1949. Word Geography of the Eastern United States. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Univ. of Michigan Press.
Leeds-Hurwitz, Wendy. 1985. “The Committee on Research in Native American Languages”. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 1291. 129–160.
. 1990. “Notes in the History of Intercultural Communication: The Foreign Service Institute and the mandate for intercultural training”. Quarterly Journal of Speech 761. 262–281.
Leeds-Hurwitz, Wendy. & James M. Nyce. 1986. “Linguistic Text Collection and the Development of Life History in the Work of Edward Sapir”. New Perspectives in Language, Culture, and Personality ed. by William Cowan, Michael Foster & Konrad Koerner, 495–531. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Lehmann, Winfred P. 1980. “Linguistics at Wisconsin and Texas”. First Person Singular ed. by Boyd H. Davis & Raymond K. O’Cain, 181–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Li Fang-Kuei. 1988. Linguistics, East and West. Berkeley: Regional Oral History Office (Bancroft Library, Univ. of California, Berkely).
Maddox, William P. 1949. “The Institute’s Program of Language Instruction”. American Foreign Service Journal 221.15–55.
. 1980. “Autobiographic Sketch: Early years in America”. First Person Singular ed. by Boyd H. Davis & Raymond K. O’Cain, 79–95. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Mandelbaum, David G., ed. 1949. Selected Writings of Edward Sapir in Language, Culture, Personality. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
McDavid, Raven I. Jr. 1980. “Linguistics, through the Kitchen Door”. First Person Singular ed. by Boyd Davis & Raymond O’Cain, 1–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Moulton, William G. 1961. “Linguistics and Language Teaching in the United States”. Trends in American and European Linguistics, 1930–1960 ed. by Christine Mohrmann, Alf Sommerfeit & Joshua Whatmough, 82–109. Utrecht & Antwerp: Spectrum.
Mullins, Nicholas C. 1972. “The Development of a Scientific Specialty: The phage group”. Minerva 101.51–82.
Murray, Stephen O. 1979. Social Science Networks. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toronto. (Published as Murray 1983b).
1980. “Gatekeepers and ‘the Chomskian Revolution’”. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 161.73–88.
1983b. Group Formation in Social Science. (=
Current Inquiry into Language, Linguistics and Human Communications, 44.) Edmonton, Alta.: Linguistic Research.
1983b. 1984. “Notes on the History of Linguistic Anthropology”. HL 111. 449–460.
1983b. 1989. “Recent Studies of American Linguistics”. HL 161.149–171. Newman, Stanley S. 1946. “On the Stress System of English”. Word 21.171–187.
Passin, Herbert. 1982. Encounter with Japan. Tokyo: Kondasha. Pike, Kenneth L. 1943. “Taxemes and Immediate Constituents”. Language 191.65–82.
. 1948. Tone Languages: A technique for determining the number and types of pitch contrasts in a language with studies in tonemic substitution and fusion. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Univ. of Michigan Press.
. 1981. “An Autobiographical Note on Phonetics”. Towards a History of Phonetics: In honour of David Abercrombie ed. by Ronald E. Asher & Eugénie Henderson, 181–185. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Press.
. 1989. “Recollections of Bloomfield”. HL 161.217–223.
Rothenberg, Jerome. 1972. Shaking the Pumpkin: Traditional poetry of the Indian North Americans. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday. Samarin, William J. 1966. “Self-Annuling Prestige Factors among Speakers of a Creole Language”. Sociolinguistics ed. by William Bright, 188–206. The Hague: Mouton.
. 1925. “Sound Patterns in Language”. Language 11.37–51. (Repr. in Mandelbaum 1949:33–45, and in Joos 1957:19–25.)
. 1931. “The Concept of Phonetic Law as Tested in Primitive Languages by Leonard Bloomfield”. Methods in Social Science: A case book ed. by Stuart A. Rice, 297–306. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press. (Repr. in Mandelbaum 1949:73–82.)
. 1933. “La réalité psychologique des phonèmes”. Journal de Psychologie Normale et Pathologique 301.247–265. [English original first published in Mandelbaum 1949:46–60.]
. 1938. “Why Cultural Anthropology Needs the Psychiatrist”. Psychiatry 11.7–12. (Repr. in Mandelbaum 1949:569–577).
Shen, Yao. 1962. “Isochronism in English”. Studies in Linguistics Occasional Paper 91. Norman, Okla.
Shohara, Hide H. & Joseph K. Yamagiwa. 1966. Intermediate Dialogues in Japanese. Ann Arbor: Far East Language Institutes.
Silverstein, Michael. 1986. “The Diachrony of Sapir’s Synchronic Linguistic Description”. New Perspectives in Language, Culture, and Personality ed. by William Cowan, Michael Foster & Konrad Koerner, 67–109. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Smith, Henry Lee, Jr. 1946. “Language Training for the Foreign Service and the Department of State”. American Foreign Service Journal 231.11–47.
Sullivan, William J. 1985. “Structure and Function in Syntactic Analysis”. Linguistics and Philosophy: Essays in honor of Rulon S. Wells ed. by Adam Makkai & Alan Melby, 205–222. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Swadesh, Morris. & C[harles] F. Voegelin. 1939. “A Problem in Phonological Alternation”. Language 141.1–10. (Repr. in Joos 1957:88–92.)
Tedlock, Dennis. 1972. Finding the Center: Narrative poetry of the Zuni Indians. Lincoln: Univ. of Nebraska Press.
Trager, George L. & Henry Lee Smith, Jr. 1951. An Outline of English Structure. (=
Studies in Linguistics; Occasional Papers, 3.) Norman, Okla.
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai S. 1935. Anleitung zu phonologischen Beschreibungen. Brno: Internationale Phonologische Arbeitsgemeinschaft.
Twaddell, W. Freeman. 1935. On Defining the Phoneme. (=
Language Monograph, 16.) Baltimore: Waverly Press. (Repr. in Joos 1957:55–80.)
Voegelin, C[harles] F[rederick] & F[lorence]. M[argaret] Voegelin. 1970. “Our Knowledge of Semantics and How It Is Obtained”. IJAL 361.241–246.
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Thomas, Margaret
2024. Three documents bearing on the foundation of the Linguistic Society of America in the age of scientific
racism. In History of Linguistics 2021 [Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 133], ► pp. 198 ff.
Léon, Jacqueline
Altman, Cristina
Altman, Cristina
2021. The ‘Brazilian Connection’ in the History of American Linguistics. Historiographia Linguistica ► pp. 355 ff.
Nuessel, Frank
Murray, Stephen O.
Murray, Stephen O.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
