Article published In: Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 17:1/2 (1990) ► pp.183–209
A brief history of American Sociolinguistics 1949–1989
Published online: 1 January 1990
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.17.1-2.14shu
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.17.1-2.14shu
Summary
American sociolinguistics was created by a set of ideas, social influences and fortunate comings-together of like-minded scholars in a fortuitous rather than carefully orchestrated manner. Very little attention has been given to the birthing of sociolinguistics and this paper recounts some of these ideas, social conditions and comings-together so that contemporary scholars can have some insights into how this field developed. It is difficult, if not impossible, to separate the growth of sociolinguistics from the influences of the theoretical paradigms prevalent at any given period of its growth. Several disciplines influenced its creation and development and the summer months of 1964 brought things into focus to the extent that virtually all subsequent advances in the field can be seen to have dependence on that very crucial period. This paper treats not only where American sociolinguistics came from but also how it has changed, its methodologies, its cross-disciplinary struggles, its current status, and prospects for its future growth.
Résumé
La sociolinguistique américaine a été créée à la suite d’une conjoncture d’un ensemble d’idées, des circonstances sociales et d’un rencontre d’esprits semblables, d’une façon plutôt fortuite qu’orchestrée. Peu d’attention a été donnée jusqu’à présent à la naissance de ‘sociolinguistique’. Le présent article offre un vue d’ensemble de cette conjoncture afin que l’érudit actuel puisse obtenir une idée de la façon de laquelle la sociolinguistique s’est developpée. Il reste difficile, même impossible, à séparer la croissance de la sociolinguistique des influences des paradigmes théoriques qui ont prédominé pendant les différents stages de son développement. Plusieurs disciplines ont parrainé sa création et son organisation et les mois d’été de 1964 ont mis au centre d’attention les ingrédients qui depuis cette époque ont caractérisé les développements et le progrès subséquents. Le présent article ne traite pas seulement de l’origine de la socio-linguistique américaine mais également de la façon dont elle a changé depuis dans sa méthode, de ses débats, de son statut actuel, et de ses chances pour sa croissance à l’avenir.
References (28)
Currie, Haver C. 1952. “A Projection of Sociolinguistics: The relationship of speech to social status”. Southern Speech Journal 181.28–37.
Ferguson, Charles & John Gumperz. 1960. “Introduction”. Linguistic Diversity in South Asia. (=
IJAL 26:3.) Bloomington, Indiana.
Hymes, Dell. 1964a. “Introduction: Toward ethnographies of communication”. The Ethnography of Communication ed. by John J. Gumperz & D. H. Hymes (American Anthropologist 66, no. 6, part 2), 1–34.
. 1964b. “A Perspective for Linguistic Anthropology”. Horizons of Anthropology ed. by Sol Tax, 92–107. Chicago: Aldine.
. 1966. Teaching and Training in Sociolinguistics. Report to Social Science Research Council, 1 November, 1966.
Koerner, Konrad. 1988. “Toward a History of Modern Sociolinguistics”. Paper presented at the Fifteenth LACUS Forum. (Rev. and extended version to appear in American Speech
63:4.)
Labov, William. 1965. “Stages in the Acquisition of Standard English”. Social Dialects and Language Learning ed. by Roger Shuy, 77–104. Champaign, I11.: National Council of Teachers of English.
. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.
McCaulay, Ronald K. S. 1988. “What Happened to Sociolinguistics?”. English World Wide 9:2.153–156.
McDavid, Raven I., Jr. 1948. “Postvocalic /-r/ in South Carolina: A social analysis”. American Speech 231.194–203.
Meillet, Antoine. 1921. Linguistique historique et linguistique générale. Paris: Société de Linguistique de Paris.
Orton, Harold et al. 1962–1971. Survey of English Dialects. Introduction and 41 vols, in 12 parts. Leeds: E. J. Arnold.
Shuy, Roger W., ed. 1965. Social Dialects and Language Learning. Champaign, I11.: National Council of Teachers of English.
, ed. 1988. “The Social Context of the Study of the Social Context of Language Variation”. Synchronic and Diachronie Approaches to Linguistic Variation and Change ed. by Thomas J. Walsh, 293–309. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown Univ. Press.
Cited by (15)
Cited by 15 other publications
Graff, Harvey J.
LiCausi, Taylor J. & Daniel A. McFarland
Spitzmüller, Jürgen
Johnstone, Barbara
Kulich, Steve J.
Chelliah, Shobhana L. & Willem J. de Reuse
Bucholtz, Mary & Kira Hall
Benson, Erica J.
Nuessel, Frank
Nuessel, Frank
1998. Review of Paulston & Tucker (1997): The Early Days of Sociolinguistics: Memories and Reflections. Language Problems and Language Planning 22:2 ► pp. 211 ff.
Falk, Julia S. & John E. Joseph
1994. The Saleski family and the founding of the LSA linguistic institutes. Historiographia Linguistica 21:1-2 ► pp. 137 ff.
Joseph, John E.
1992. Paul Hanly Furfey and the origins of American sociolinguistics. Historiographia Linguistica 19:1 ► pp. 111 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
