Review published In: Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 12:1/2 (1985) ► pp.209–213
Book review
Group Formation in Social Science. By Stephen O. Murray
Reviewed by
Published online: 1 January 1985
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.12.1-2.19dil
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.12.1-2.19dil
References (14)
Bunge, Mario. 1983. Treatise in Basic Philosophy. Vol. 61: Understanding in the world. (= Epistemology and Methodology, 2.) Dordrecht, & Boston: D. Reidel.
Griffith, Belver C. & Nicholas Mullins. 1972. “Invisible colleges: Small, coherent groups may be the same throughout science”. Science 1771.959–64.
Hymes, Dell & John Fought. 1975. “American structuralism”. Current Trends in Linguistics. ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, Vol.131, part 21: Historiography of Linguistics, 903–1156. The Hague: Mouton. (Reprinted in book form, ibid., 1981.)
Koerner, Konrad. 1983. “The Chomskyan ‘Revolution’ and its Historiography: A few critical remarks”. Language & Communication 3:2.147–169.
Kuhn, Thomas. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd enl. ed. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
Laudan, Larry. 1977. Progress and its Problems: Towards a theory of scientific growth. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Murray, Stephen O. 1980. “Gatekeepers and the ‘Chomskian Revolution’”. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 161.73–88.
1981. Review of Newmeyer (1980). HL 81.107–112.
1982. “The Reviewer Responds”. HL 91.187.
Newmeyer, Frederick J. 1980. Linguistic Theory in America: The first quarter century of transformational generative grammar. New York: Academic Press.
1982. “Reply to Murray’s Review”. HL 91.185–86.
