Article published In: Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 1:2 (1974) ► pp.169–183
John Eliot of Massachusetts and the Beginnings of American Linguistics
Published online: 1 January 1974
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.1.2.04min
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.1.2.04min
Summary
The author puts forward the claim that The Indian Grammar Begun (1666) of John Eliot of Massachusetts (1604–90) constitutes the first published account of an ‘exotic’ language that can rightfully be called scientific (0.). The first portion of the argument treats Eliot’s English-based orthography and the problems it poses in the description of a language completely different from English (1.). Eliot’s use of a ‘morphophonemic’ transcription is presented (2.). Eliot’s The Logick Primer (1672) is suggested as a source of particular insights into the Puritan understanding and use of logic (3.). Having speculated about the impact that Jesus College, Cambridge, may have had on Eliot’s linguistic accomplishments in his analysis of an Amerindian language (4.), the author concludes that Eliot derserves to be called the true founder of American linguistics, in particular since he anticipated modern use of levels of representation by more than a century (5.).
References (29)
Day, Gordon M., Karl V. Teeter, et al. 1967. Contributions to Anthropology: Linguistics I (Algonquian). National Musuem of Canada (Ottawa), Bulletin 214, Anthropological Series No. 78, Ottawa: Queen’s Printer.
Dobson, Eric J. 1968. English Pronunciation 1500–1700. 21 vols. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. (First ed., 1957.)
Dunn, Catherine M., ed. 1969. The Logicke of the Most Excellent Philosopher Peter Ramus Martyr. Northridge, Calif.: San Fernando State College, Renaissance Editions No. 3.
Duponceau, Peter S. 1822. “Notes and Observations on Eliot’s Indian Grammar. Addressed to John Pickering, Esq.” Massachusetts Historical Society Collections, 2nd Series, Vol. 91.247–312.
Eames, Wilberforce. 1937. “The Discovery of a Lost Cambridge Imprint: John Eliot’s Genesis, 1655.” Transactions of the Colonial Society of Massachusetts 341.11–12.
Eliot, John (tr.). 1663. The Holy Bible; containing the Old Testament and The New. Translated into The Indian Language… Cambridge, Mass.: Printed by Samuel Green and Marmaduke Johnson. (2nd edition, “much corrected and amended,” 1685. Printed by Samuel Green.) Evans Nos. 72, 385.
. 1666. The Indian Grammar Begun: or, an Essy to Bring the Indian Language into Rules… Cambridge (Mass.): Printed by Marmaduke Johnson. Available as Evans No. 1061, Readex Microprint Edition of Early American Imprints. Also reprinted in Massachusetts Historical Society Collections, 2nd Series, Vol. 91, 247–312. 1822. [Quotes pertain to this reprint.]
. 1672. The Logick Primer. Some Logical Notions to Initiate the Indians in the Knowledge of the Rule of Reason… Cambridge, Mass.: Printed by Marmaduke Johnson. Available as Evans No. 1661, Readex Microprint Edition of Early American Imprints. Also reprinted as The Logic Primer, Cleveland (Ohio): Burrows Bros., 1904. [Page references are to the reprint.]
Farnaby, Thomas. 1641. Systema Grammaticum. London: A. Crooke. (Facsimile-repr. Menston, Yorks.: Scolar Press. 1969.)
Haas, Mary R. 1967. “Roger Williams’ Sound Shift: A Study in Algonkian [sic]”. To Honor Roman Jakobson: Essays on the occasion of his seventieth birthday, Vol. 11, pp. 816–32. The Hague: Mouton.
Hanzeli, Victor H. 1969. Missionary Linguistics in New France: A Study of 17th and 18th century descriptions of American Indian languages. The Hague: Mouton.
Luick, Karl. 1929–40. Historische Grammatik der englischen Sprache. Vol.I, Part ii. Leipzig: C. H. Tauchnitz. (Repr. Oxford: Blackwell; Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press, 1964.)
Miller, Perry. 1954. The New England Mind: The seventeenth century. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.
Ong, Walter J., S.J. 1958. Ramus: Method, and the Decay of Dialogue; from the Art of Discourse to the Art of Reason. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.
Pickering, John. 1822. “The Massachusetts Language.” Massachusetts Historical Society Collections, 2nd Series, Vol. 91.223–42.
, ed. 1829a. Josiah Cotton, Vocabulary of the Massachusetts (or Natick) Indian Language. Cambridge, Mass.: E. W. Metcalf & Co.
. 1829b. “Indian Languages of America.” An appendix to vol. VI1 of Encyclopaedia Americana: A popular dictionary of arts, sciences, literature, history, politics, and biography, brought down to the present time: including a copious collection of original articles in American biography on the basis of the seventh edition of the German Conversations-Lexicon. Edited by Francis Lieber. 131 v. Philadelphia: Desilver, Thomas & Co. 1st ed. 1829; 2nd ed. 1836, pp.581–600.
Powicke, Frederick James, ed. 1931. Some Unpublished Correspondence of the Reverend Richard Baxter and the Reverend John Eliot, the Apostle of the American Indians, 1656–1682. Manchester: University Press. (Reprinted from “The Bulletin of the John Rylands Library,” vol. 15, no. 2, July 1931.)
Silver, Shirley. 1960. “Natick Consonants in Reference to Proto-Central Algonquian: I & II.” IJAL 261.112–20, 234–64.
Stevens, Cj [sic]. 1954. Early American Phonology. Louisiana State University Doctoral Dissertation, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
Trumbull, James Hammond, ed. 1866. “Roger Williams, a key in the language of America.” Narnaganset Club Publications, 1st series, Vol. 21.
, ed. 1903. Natick Dictionary. Smithsonian Institution, Bureau of Ethnology, Bulletin 25. With an introd. by Edward Everett Hale.
Updike, Daniel B. 1966. Printing Types, their History, Forms, and Use: A study in survivals. Vol. 21. 3rd ed. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Uckelman, Sara L.
Kilarski, Marcin
Chelliah, Shobhana L. & Willem J. de Reuse
Fountain, Catherine
Salmon, Vivian
1985. Missionary linguistics in seventeenth century Ireland and a North American Analogy. Historiographia Linguistica 12:3 ► pp. 321 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
