Article published In: Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 1:2 (1974) ► pp.147–163
John Wilkins’ Essay (1668)
Critics and continuators
Published online: 1 January 1974
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.1.2.02sal
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.1.2.02sal
Summary
One of the major achievements of Britsh linguistic scholarship before the 19th century was John Wilkins’ (1609–72) Essay towards a Real Character, and a Philosophical Language (1668), which attempted to construct, for scientific purposes, a language in which the elements were isomorphic with the categories of reality (as they were perceived by Wilkins). Immediately after its publication, the Essay was presented to the scientists of the newly-founded Royal Society for their critical appraisal. Since the committee appointed to examine it never reported, it has usually been assumed that they were uninterested or disapproving. It can now be shown, however, that it was certainly not lack of enthusiasm among Wilkins’ contemporaries that led to the absence of a report, and that three members of the original committee took part in a project to revise the Essay after its author’s death. It has long been known that a small group were informally engaged on its revision in 1678, according to a report of the antiquarian John Aubrey (1626–97), F.R.S., but hitherto nothing has been known of the enterprise. Recently, their correspondence has been discovered among Aubrey’s collection of manuscripts in the Bodleian Library, and these letters, besides showing links with the original committee, illustrate the growth of linguistic insight in the would-be improvers, particularly in respect of semantic classification and various problems in the phonetics of English. The course of their discussion is traced here, and the reasons for their eventual rejection of Wilkins’ scheme. Yet the immense undertaking was never wholly forgotten; it aroused the interest of at least one eminent 18th-century scientist, and became one source of inspiration for Peter Mark Roget (1779–1869), creator of the famous Thesaurus.
References (23)
Beck, Cave. 1657. The Universal Character, by which all the nations in the world may understand one anothers conceptions, reading out of one common writing their own mother tongues, etc. London: T. Maxey for W. Weekley.
Burthogge, Richard. 1678. Organum vetus et novum. Or, a discourse of reason and truth. Wherein the natural logicke common to mankinde is briefly and plainly described. London: S. Crouch.
Cooper, Christopher. 1685. Grammatica linguae anglicanae. London: Printed by J. Richardson for B. Tooke. (New ed., prepared by J. D. Jones, Halle/S.: M. Niemeyer, 1911.)
Dalgarno, George. 1661. Ars signorum, vulgo character universalis et lingua philosophica, etc. London: J. Hayes.
Hooke, Robert. 1676. A Description of Helioscopes, and some other Instruments. London: Royal Society.
Horne Tooke, John. 1798[1786]-1805. ’Επϵαπτϵροϵυτa̗ or, The diversions of Purley. 2nd rev. ed., 21 vols. London: J. Johnson.
Michael, Ian. 1970. English Grammatical Categories and the Tradition to 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
[Paschall, Andrew]. 1670. Propositions for the Carrying on a Philosophical Correspondence, already begun in the county of Sommerset upon incoura-gement given from the Royal Society. London: J. Collins.
Priestley, Joseph. 1762. A Course of Lectures on the Theory of Language and Universal Grammar. Warrington: W. Eyres.
Ray, John. 1760. Select Remains of the Learned John Ray… With his life, by… W. Derham. London: J. Dodsley.
Roget, Peter Mark. 1852. Thesaurus of English Words and Phrases, classified and arranged so as to facilitate the expression of ideas and assist in literary composition. London: Longman, Brown, Green & Longmans. (Re-ed. by Robert A. Dutch. London: Longman, 1962.)
Salmon, Vivian. 1972. The Works of Francis Lodwick: A study of his writings in the intellectual context of the seventeenth century. London: Longman.
Stephens, J. E. 1972. Aubrey on Education: A hitherto unpublished manuscript. London & Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Tooke,
see Horne Tooke.
Turner, Anthony J. “Andrew Paschall’s Tables of Plants for the Universal Language, 1678”. Bodleian Library Record (to appear).
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Poole, William
Linn, Andrew R & William Poole
Lauzon, Matthew J.
1996.
Language and the History of Thought. Edited by Nancy Struever. Historiographia Linguistica 23:3 ► pp. 445 ff.
Richards, Graham
Subbiondo, Joseph L.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
