Article published In: Latin Grammars in Transition, 1200 - 1600
Edited by Anneli Luhtala and Mark E. Amsler
[Historiographia Linguistica 44:2/3] 2017
► pp. 255–277
Articles / Aufätze
Latin parsing grammars from the Carolingian age to the later Middle Ages
Trends and developments
Published online: 28 May 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.00004.rei
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.00004.rei
Abstract
This article traces the history of Latin parsing grammars from Late Antiquity up to the 14th century, focusing on the group of texts with the incipit Dominus quae pars. These grammars circulating mainly north of the Alps were intended to be studied at the elementary and intermediate levels of education following the study of the Donatus minor. By asking questions about a chosen headword of each part of speech in turn, the parsing manuals offered a technique which allowed the pupil to put into practice what he had already learnt and the teacher to focus on the information he considered as relevant, including different aspects of morphology, semantics, etymology, prosody or accentuation. A number of novelties introduced into the theoretical grammars also filtered down to the lower levels of teaching. Thus, when a section on syntax began to be incorporated into pedagogical grammars in the 12th century, some syntactical concepts also entered into parsing grammars. From the 13th century onwards, elements of Aristotelian logic and physics were also integrated into the theory of the parts of speech and their syntax in the Dominus quae pars texts.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The origins of the parsing method in Antiquity
- 3.Early medieval parsing grammars
- 4.The re-emergence of parsing grammars: 800–1000
- 5.Parsing grammars 1100–1400: The rise in popularity
- 6.Postscript
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (59)
A.
Primary sources
Alexander de Villa-Dei. Das Doctrinale des Alexander de Villa-Dei. Kritisch-exegetische Ausgabe by Dietrich Reichling. (= Monumenta Germaniae Pedagogica, 12.) Berlin: A. Hofmann, 1893. (Repr., New York: Burt Franklin, 1974.)
Anima quae pars. Ed. by Don Chapman. “Anima quae pars’: A Tenth-Century Parsing Grammar”. The Journal of Medieval Latin 121.180–204 (2002).
Beatus quid est. Ed. by Martha Bayless. “Beatus quid est and the Study of Grammar in Late Anglo-Saxon England”. History of Linguistic Thought in the Early Middle Ages ed. by Vivien Law, 67–110. (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 71.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1993.
Donatus, Aelius. Ars minor, Ars maior. Ed. by Louis Holtz. Donat et la traditon de l’enseignement grammatical: Étude sur l’Ars Donati et sa diffusion (IVe–IXe siècle) et édition critique. Paris: CNRS, 1981.
Donatus, Fundamentum, Regulae. Tre Latinske Grammatikker. Donatus, Fundamentum, Regulae. Ed. by Jan Pinborg & Erik Dal. Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1979.
Evrard of Béthune. Eberhardi Bethuniensis Graecismus. Ed. by Johann Wrobel. Breslau: G. Koebner, 1887.
GL = Grammatici Latini. Ed. by Heinrich Keil. 81 vols. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner, 1855–1880. (Repr., Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1981.)
Grammatici Latini supplementum. Anecdota Helvetica quae ad grammaticam Latinam spectant ex bibliothecis Turicensi Einsidlensi Bernensi. Ed. by Hermann Hagen. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner, 1870.
Julian of Toledo. Ars Iuliani Toletani Episcopi: Una gramática latina de la España visigoda. Ed. by Maria Maestre Yenes. (= Publicaciones del Instituto provincial de investigaciones y estudios Toledano, Serie 2: Vestigios del pasado, 5). Toledo: Instituto provincial de investigaciones y estudios Toledano, 1973.
Magister quae pars. Ed. by E. Klug. De florilegiis codicis Monacensis 6292 et codicis Trevirensis 1092. Greifswald: Doctoral dissertation, 1913.
Magnus quae uox. Ed. by Jee Yeon Jang. A critical edition of Magnus quae uox? with introduction, commentary and translation. Ph.D. thesis. University of Cambridge, 2003.
Paolo Camaldolese. Il Donatus di Paolo Camaldolese. Ed. by Vito Sivo. Spoleto: Centro Italiano di studi sull’alto medioevo, 1990.
Peter Helias. Summa super Priscianum. Ed. by Leo Reilly. 21 vols. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1993.
Peter of Pisa. Ars grammatica. Ed. by Michael Gorman & Elke Krotz. Grammatical Works Attributed to Peter of Pisa, Charlemagne’s Tutor. (= Bibliotheca Weidmanniana, 16.) Hildesheim: Olms-Weidmann, 2014.
. Grammatica. Ed. by Anneli Luhtala & Anna Reinikka. Corpus Christianorum Continuatio Mediaevalis. Brepols, forthcoming.
Priscian. Prisciani Grammatici Caesariensis Institutionum Grammaticarum libri XVIII. Ed. by Martin Hertz=GL II–III.
B.
Secondary sources
Black, Robert D. 1996. “‘Ianua’ and Elementary Education in Italy and Northern Europe in the Later Middle Ages”. Italia ed Europa nella linguistica del Rinascimento I: L’Italia e il mondo romanzo ed. by Mirko Tavoni et al., 5–22. Modena: Panini.
2001. Humanism and Education in Medieval and Renaissance Italy: Tradition and innovation in Latin schools from the twelfth to the fifteenth century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bursill-Hall, Geoffrey L[eslie]. 1977. “Teaching Grammars of the Middle Ages”. Historiographia Lingsuistica 41.1–29.
Bursill-Hall, Geoffrey L. 1981a. A Census of Medieval Latin Grammatical Manuscripts. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.
1981b. “Medieval Donatus Commentaries”. Historiographia Linguistica 8:1.69–95.
CIMAGL = Cahiers de l’institut du Moyen-Age grec et latin. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen 1969– .[URL] since 2010.
Colombo Timelli, Maria. 1997. “Manuels français de syntaxe latine du XVe siècle: Répertoire et typologie”. Histoire Épistemologie Langage 19:2.133–153.
Copeland, Rita & Ineke Sluiter. 2009. Medieval Grammar and Rhetoric: Language arts and literary theory, AD 300–1475. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Droz, Eugénie. 1964. “Les ‘Regule’ de Remigius, Münster en Westphalie, 1486”. Studi di bibliografia in onore di Tammaro de Marinis ed. by Romeo De Maio, 265–280. Verona: G. Mardersteig.
Fredborg, Karin Margareta. 1973. “The Dependence of Petrus Helias’ Summa super Priscianum on William of Conches’ Glose super Priscianum
”. CIMAGL 111.1–57.
. 1988. “Speculative Grammar”. A History of Twelfth-Century Western Philosophy ed. by Peter Dronke, 177–195. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Glück, Manfred. 1967. Priscians Partitiones und ihre Stellung in der spätantiken Schule. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.
Jeudy, Colette & Yves Riou. 1989. Les manuscrits classiques latins des bibliothèques publiques de France. I: Agen-Évreux. Paris: CNRS.
Kaster, Robert A. 1988. Guardians of Language: The grammarian and society in late antiquity. Berkeley, Cal.: University of California Press.
Kelly, Louis G[erard]. 2002. The Mirror of Grammar: Theology, Philosophy, and the Modistae. (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 101). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Kneepkens, Corneille Henri. 1978. “Master Guido and his View on Government: On twelfth century linguistic thought”. Vivarium 161.108–141.
. “Scholasticism versus Humanism: A conflict of interests? Late fifteenth-century reflections on grammar in northwestern Europe”. Language and Cultural Change: Aspects of the study and use of language in the Later Middle Ages and the Renaissance ed. by Lodi Nauta, 23–58. Leuven-Paris-Dudley: Peeters, 2006.
. 1986. “Grammatica normativa nel XIII sec.” Aspetti della letteratura latina nel secolo XIII ed. by Claudio Leonardi & Giovanni Orlandi, 125–145. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.
. 2000. “Memory and the Structure of Grammars in Antiquity and the Middle Ages”. Manuscripts and Tradition of Grammatical Texts from Antiquity to the Renaissance I1 ed. by Mario De Nonno et al., 9–58. Cassino: Università degli studi di Cassino.
. 2003. The History of Linguistics in Europe from Plato to 1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Luhtala, Anneli. 1993. “Syntax and Dialectic in Carolingian Commentaries on Priscian’s Institutiones grammaticae
.” History of Linguistic Thought in the Early Middle Ages ed by Vivien Law (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 71), 145–191. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
. 2000. “Excerpta da Prisciano, Diomede e Pompeo compilati da Pietro da Pisa nel codice Bruxell. II 2572”. Manuscripts and Tradition of Grammatical Texts from Antiquity to the Renaissance I1 ed. by Mario De Nonno et al., 327–350. Cassino: Università degli studi di Cassino.
. 2013. “Pedagogical Grammars before the Eighteenth Century”. The Oxford Handbook of the History of Linguistics ed. by Keith Allan, 341–358. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 1997. “Le Partitiones di Prisciano nella tradizione medievale e umanistica”. MOUSA: Scritti in onore di Giuseppe Morelli ed. by Giovanni Cupaiuolo, 371–380. Bologna: Pàtron.
Pinborg, Jan. 1982a, ed. Remigius, Schleswig 1486, A Latin Grammar in Facsimile Edition with a Postscript. (= Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab Historisk-filosofiske Meddelelser, 50.4.) Copenhagen: Einar Munksgaard, 1982.
. 1982b. “Speculative Grammar”. The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy: From the rediscovery of Aristotle to the disintegration of scholasticism 1100–1600 ed. by Norman Kretzmann et al., 254–270. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Robins, Robert H[enry]. 1993. The Byzantine Grammarians: Trends in linguistics. (= Studies and Monographs, 70.) Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Rosier-Catach, Irène. 1994. “L’introduction des notions de sujet et de prédicat dans la grammaire médiévale”. Archives et documents de la SHESL 101.81–119.
. 2010. “Grammar”. Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy II1 ed. by Robert Pasnau & Christina Van Dyke, 196–216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thomson, David. 1984. An Edition of the Middle English Grammatical Texts. New York & London: Garland.
Schmitt, Wolfgang. 1969. “Die Ianua (Donatus): Ein Beitrag zur lateinischen Schulgrammatik des Mittelalters und der Renaissance”. Beiträge zur Inkunabelkunde 41.43–80.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Luhtala, Anneli
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
