References (36)
References
Augustine of Hippo, St. 2020. Confessions. Translated by P. Constantine. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. 2008. Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brdar, M., & Brdar-Szabó, R. 2011. Metonymy, metaphor and the “weekend frame of mind”: Towards motivating the micro-variation in the use of one type of metonymy. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Motivation in grammar and the lexicon (233–250). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brdar, M., Omazić, M., Pavičić Takač, V., Gradečak-Erdeljić, T., & Buljan, G. (Eds.). 2011. Space and Time in Language. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buzsáki, G., & Tingley, D. 2018. Space and time: The hippocampus as a sequence generator. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(10), 853–869. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cienki, A., & Iriskhanova, O. K. 2018. Aspectuality across Languages: Event construal in speech and gesture. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, N., & Wilkins, D. 2000. In the mind’s ear: The semantic extensions of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language, 76(3), 546–592. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. Language and time: A cognitive linguistics approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Filipović, L., & Jaszczolt, K. M. (2012a). Space and Time in Languages and Cultures: Linguistic diversity. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012b). Space and Time in Languages and Cultures: Language, culture, and cognition. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fortescue, M. 2024. Space, Time, World. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
François, A. 2008. Semantic maps and the typology of colexification: Intertwining polysemous networks across languages. In M. Vanhove (Ed.), From polysemy to semantic change (163–215). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs Jr, R. W. 2005. Embodiment and cognitive Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gontier, N., Lock, A., & Sinha, C. (Eds.). 2024. Oxford handbook of human symbolic evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. 1999. Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics, 37(6), 1043–1068. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1996 (1953). Being and time. (A translation of Sein und Zeit, 1953, Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. Translated by J. Stamnaugh). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Imrényi, A. 2017. Form-meaning correspondences in multiple dimensions: The structure of Hungarian finite clauses. Cognitive Linguistics, 28(2), 287–319. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaszczolt, K. M. (Ed.). 2023. Understanding human time. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, W., & Li, P. (Eds.). 2009. The Expression of Time. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. 2017. Levels of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics, 28(2), 321–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2019. Some consequences of a multi-level view of metaphor. In I. Navarro i Ferrando (Ed.), Current approaches to metaphor analysis in discourse (19–34). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2020. Extended conceptual metaphor theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume 1. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1999. Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2016. Baseline and elaboration. Cognitive Linguistics, 27(3), 405–439. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Le Guen, O., & Balam, L. I. P. 2012. No metaphorical timeline in gesture and cognition among Yucatec Mayas. Frontiers in Psychology 3, 271. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. (Ed.). 2016. Conceptualizations of time. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mermin, N. David. 2005. It’s about time: Understanding Einstein’s relativity. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pajusalu, R. 2006. Death of a demonstrative: person and time. The case of Estonian too. Linguistica Uralica, 42(4), 241–253. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Patard, A., & Brisard, F. (Eds.). 2011. Cognitive approaches to tense, aspect, and epistemic modality. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piata, A., Gordejuela, A., & Alcaraz Carrión, D. (Eds.), 2022. Time representations in the perspective of human creativity. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shankland, R. S. 1963. Conversations with Albert Einstein. American Journal of Physics, 31(1), 47–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silva Sinha, V. da. 2019. Event-based time in three indigenous Amazonian and Xinguan cultures and languages. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zulaica Hernández, I. 2012. Temporal constraints in the use of demonstratives in Iberian Spanish. Borealis — An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 1(2), 195–234. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue