Cover not available

In:Thinking and Speaking About Time: A cognitive linguistic approach
Edited by Rita Brdar-Szabó and Mario Brdar
[Human Cognitive Processing 81] 2026
► pp. 197222

References (33)
References
Chesterman, A. 1991. On definiteness. A study with special reference to English and Finnish. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
City Digital Group 2022. City Digital Group Provides Online Technologies for Digital Leaders and Online Services Reaching Millions of Users Every Week. [URL]. (Accessed 17.12.2022.)
Clark, H. H. 1973. Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and acquisition of language (27–63). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dhifallah, A. 2024. EGO/Speaker deixis: Ego-centered motion metaphors of time between Arabic and English — A comparative corpus-based study. Annales Universitatis Turkuensis, series B, 671, Humaniora. Turku: University of Turku. [URL]
Duong, B. 2021. Fictive motion. Some models in cognitive linguistics. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 8(1), 1–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hakulinen, A., Vilkuna, M., Korhonen, R., Koivisto, V., Heinonen, T. R., & Alho, I. 2004. Iso suomen kielioppi. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huumo, T. 2003. Incremental existence. The world according to the Finnish existential sentence. Linguistics, 41(3), 461–493. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2017. The grammar of temporal motion. A Cognitive Grammar account of motion metaphors of time. Cognitive Linguistics, 28(1), 1–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2023a. The Finnish existential clause: Aspect, case marking and quantification of the S argument. In L. Sarda, & L. Lena (Eds.), Existential constructions across languages: Forms, meanings and functions (216–240). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2023b. Toward a Cognitive Grammar account of the Finnish partitive case. In M. Jaakola & T. Onikki-Rantajääskö (Eds.), The Finnish case system: Cognitive Linguistic perspectives. Studia Fennica Linguistica 23, (41–75). Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2024. Why partitive? Possible motivations for the partitive complement of Finnic adpositions. Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics 15(1), (55–100). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huumo, T., & Helasvuo, M.-L. 2015. On the subject of subject in Finnish. In M.-L. Helasvuo, & T. Huumo (Eds.), Subjects in constructions: canonical and non-canonical (13–41). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karsikas, E. 2004. Tuli huikean avara suo, ja sen kainalosta hyppäsi taivaille karmea vuori. Spatiaalisen sijainnin ilmaiseminen fiktiivisenä liikkeenä. Sananjalka, 46, 7–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
KS = Kielitoimiston sanakirja. 2022. [Online.] Kotimaisten kielten keskuksen verkkojulkaisuja 35. Helsinki: Kotimaisten kielten keskus. [URL]. (Accessed 6.2.2023.)
Laitinen, L. 2006. Zero person in Finnish: A grammatical resource for construing human reference. In M.-L.- Helasvuo & L. Campbell (Eds.), Grammar from the human perspective: Case, space, and person in Finnish. Current issues in linguistic theory 277 (209–231). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1999. Philosophy in the flesh. The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larjavaara, M. 1990. Suomen deiksis. Suomi 156. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGlone, M. S. & Harding, J. L. 1998. Back (or forward?) to the future. The role of perspective in temporal language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 24(5), 1211–1223. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moore, K. E. 2000. Spatial experience and temporal metaphors in Wolof. Point of view, conceptual mapping, and linguistic practice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.
2017. Elaborating time in space: the structure and function of space-motion metaphors of time. Language and Cognition 9 (2), 191–253. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nuñez, R. 1999. Could the future taste purple? Reclaiming mind, body and cognition. In Rafael Nuñez & Walter J. Freeman (Eds), Reclaiming cognition. The primacy of action, intention and emotion (41–60). Thorverton: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Núñez, R. & Sweetser, E. 2006. With the future behind them. Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science 30(3), 401–450. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
SES = Suomen etymologinen sanakirja 2022. Kotimaisten kielten keskuksen verkkojulkaisuja 72. Helsinki: Kotimaisten kielten keskus. [URL]. (Accessed 17.2.2022.)
Suomi24. 2022. Keskustelut. [URL] (Accessed 17.12.2022.)
Svorou, S. 1994. The grammar of space. 5. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. 1975. Figure and ground in complex sentences. Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 419–430.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2000. Toward a cognitive semantics. Volume I. Concept structuring systems. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tuuri, E. & Belliard, M. 2021. Liikkeen kielentämisen variaatio lähisukukielissä. Väylän alun ja lopun ilmaisu suomessa ja virossa. Finnish Journal of Linguistics, 34, 257–299.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vilkuna, M. 1989. Free word order in Finnish: Its syntax and discourse functions. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue