Cover not available

In:Thinking and Speaking About Time: A cognitive linguistic approach
Edited by Rita Brdar-Szabó and Mario Brdar
[Human Cognitive Processing 81] 2026
► pp. 39–100

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 2
Verbs, time and existence

 | University of California, San DiegoSan Diego
Published online: 27 January 2026
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.81.02lan
Abstract
Basic features of nominal and clausal structure are re-examined in light of recent developments in Cognitive Grammar. By positing only assemblies of symbolic structures, this framework aims at a unified account of structure, processing, and discourse. A main theme of this chapter is the parallelism of nominal and clausal structures, reflecting that of the archetypes functioning as the noun and verb prototypes: objects and events. An important source of unification is the suggestion that an event exists through time in much the same way that an object exists in space. Among the issues considered at some length are grounding, the nature of “existence,” the conceptual definition of grammatical categories (verbs in particular), and an approach to linguistic meaning featuring comparison chains and paths of access.
Article outline
  • 1.Assemblies
  • 2.Time
  • 3.Basic categories
  • 4.Nominals and clauses
  • 5.Existence
  • 6.Clause structure
  • 7.Interactive grounding
  • 8.Conclusion
    • Extent
    • Reality
    • Discursive organization
    • Universality
  • Notes
  • References
References (55)
References
Austin, J. L. 1962. How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. 1933. Language. New York: Holt.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brisard, F., & De Wit, A. 2013. Modal uses of the English present progressive. In J. I. Marín-Arrese, M. Carretero, J- Arús Hita, & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), English modality: Core, periphery and evidentiality (201–220). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Broccias, C., & Hollmann, W. B. 2007. Do we need summary and sequential scanning in (Cognitive) Grammar? Cognitive Linguistics, 18, 487–522. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, W. 1994. Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coates, R. 2006. Properhood. Language, 82, 356–382. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W. 2001. Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culicover, P. W., & Jackendoff, R. 2012. same-except: A domain-general cognitive relation and how language expresses it. Language, 88, 305–340. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diessel, H., & Tomasello, M. 2001. The acquisition of finite complement clauses in English: A corpus-based analysis. Cognitive Linguistics, 12, 97–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. 2002. The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gernsbacher, M. A., & Hargreaves, D. 1992. The privilege of primacy: Experimental data and cognitive explanations. In D. L. Payne (Ed.), Pragmatics of word order flexibility (83–116). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldsmith, J., & Woisetschlaeger, E. 1982. The logic of the English progressive. Linguistic Inquiry, 13, 79–89.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haiman, J. 1980. Dictionaries and encyclopedias. Lingua, 50, 329–357. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hawkins, B. W. 1984. The semantics of English spatial prepositions. San Diego: University of California doctoral dissertation.
Janssen, Th. A. J. M. 1995. Deixis from a cognitive point of view. In E. Contini-Morava, & B. S. Goldberg (Eds.), Meaning as explanation: Advances in linguistic sign theory (245–270). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keenan, E. L., & Comrie, B. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 63–99.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. 1982. Space grammar, analysability, and the English passive. Language, 58, 22–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1, Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 2, Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1997. Constituency, dependency, and conceptual grouping. Cognitive Linguistics, 8, 1–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1998. Conceptualization, symbolization, and grammar. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure (1–39). Mahwah, N.J., & London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1999a. Virtual reality. In S. J. J. Hwang, & A. R. Lommel (Eds.), LACUS Forum XXV (41–69). Fullerton, CA: Linguistic Association of Canada and the United States.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1999b. Assessing the cognitive linguistic enterprise. In Th. Janssen. & G. Redeker (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Foundations, scope, and methodology (13–59). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1999c. A study in unified diversity: English and Mixtec locatives. RASK, 9/10, 215–256.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2001. Discourse in Cognitive Grammar. Cognitive Linguistics, 12, 143–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2005a. Construction grammars: Cognitive, radical, and less so. In F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, & M. S. Peña Cervel (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction (101–159). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2005b. Dynamicity, fictivity, and scanning: The imaginative basis of logic and linguistic meaning. In D. Pecher, & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language and thinking (164–197). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2006. On the continuous debate about discreteness. Cognitive Linguistics, 17, 107–151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008a. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008b. Enunciating the parallelism of nominal and clausal grounding. In J.-R. Lapaire, G. Desagulier, & J.-B. Guignard (Eds.), Du fait grammatical au fait cognitif [From gram to mind: Grammar as cognition], Vol. 1 (17–65). Pessac: Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008c. Sequential and summary scanning: A reply. Cognitive Linguistics, 19, 571–584. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2009. Investigations in cognitive grammar. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. How not to disagree: The emergence of structure from usage. In K. Boye, & E. Engberg-Pedersen (Eds.), Language usage and language structure (107–143). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011. The English present: Temporal coincidence vs. epistemic immediacy. In A. Patard, & F. Brisard (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to tense, aspect, and epistemic modality (45–86). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. Modals: Striving for control. In J. I. Marín-Arrese, M. Carretero, J. Arús Hita, & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), English modality: Core, periphery and evidentiality (3–55). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015a. On grammatical categories. Journal of Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 44–79.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015b. Descriptive and discursive organization in Cognitive Grammar. In J. Daems, E. Zenner, K. Heylen, D. Speelman, & H. Cuykens (Eds.), Change of paradigms — new paradoxes: Recontextualizing language and linguistics (205–218). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2016a. Toward an integrated view of structure, processing, and discourse. In G. Drożdż (Ed.), Studies in lexicogrammar: Theory and applications (23–53). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2016b. Nominal structure in Cognitive Grammar: The Lublin lectures. Lublin: Marie Curie-Skłodowska University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2016c. Baseline and elaboration. Cognitive Linguistics, 27, 405–439. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2019. Levels of reality. Languages, 4(2), 22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2020. Trees, assemblies, chains, and windows. In T. Timponi Torrent, E. Edison da Silva Matos, & N. Sather Sigiliano (Eds.), Construction grammar across borders (8–55). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lashley, K. S. 1951. The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior (112–136). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matlock, T. 2004. The conceptual motivation of fictive motion. In G. Radden, & K.-U. Panther (Eds.), Studies in linguistic motivation (221–248). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. B. 2001. Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. In J. Bybee, & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (137–157). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sweetser, E. E. 1982. Root and epistemic modals: Causality in two worlds. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 8, 484–507.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. 1978. Figure and ground in complex sentences. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of human language, Vol. 4, Syntax (625–649). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1988. Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 12, 49–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1996a. The windowing of attention in language. In M. Shibatani, & S. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning (235–287). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1996b. Fictive motion in language and “ception”. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (211–276). Cambridge & London: MIT Press/Bradford. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2000. Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA & London: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verhagen, A. 2005. Constructions of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax, and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. 1995. Dictionaries vs. encyclopaedias: How to draw the line. In P. W. Davis (Ed.), Alternative linguistics: Descriptive and theoretical modes, 289–315. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue