In:Time Representations in the Perspective of Human Creativity
Edited by Anna Piata, Adriana Gordejuela and Daniel Alcaraz Carrión
[Human Cognitive Processing 75] 2022
► pp. 147–162
Chapter 7Beyond the limits
Merging past and present in film flashbacks
Published online: 10 November 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.75.07gor
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.75.07gor
Abstract
Film flashbacks are rich multimodal devices that combine a stable pattern of retrospection with formal versatility that provides filmmakers with much space for being creative (Turim 1989; Gordejuela 2021). This chapter focuses on a particular kind of flashbacks where past and present are rendered simultaneously in two possible ways: either the past gets inserted into the present and is merged with it, or a character from the present appears as such in his or her own memories of the past. Through decompression of identity, these flashbacks simultaneously represent two different perspectives (viewpoint compression) and two separate moments in time (time compression) (cf. Dancygier 2012). The chapter illustrates the creative rendering of narrative time in a number of unconventional flashbacks.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Flashbacks in film: Tradition and innovation
- 3.Creative techniques in film flashbacks
- 3.1Embedding the past in the present
- 3.2Decompression of identity for viewpoint compression
- 4.Conclusions
Notes References Films
References (29)
Analepsis. (n.d.). Oxford English dictionary online. Retrieved September 21, 2021, from [URL]
(2017). Reinventing Hollywood: How 1940s filmmakers changed movie storytelling. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bordwell, D., & Carroll, N. (Eds.) (1996). Post-theory: Reconstructing film studies. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Currie, G. (1995). Image and mind: Film, philosophy, and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fauconnier, G. (1994). Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1985).
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Fillmore, C. J. (1976). Frame semantics and the nature of language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Conference on the origin and development of language and speech, 280, 20–32.
Greenberg, H., & Gabbard, K. (1999). Reel recollection: Notes on the cinematic depiction of memory. PSYART: A Hyperlink Journal for the Psychological Study of the Arts, 3. [URL]
Matthews, W. J., & Meck, W. H. (2016). Temporal cognition: connecting subjective time to perception, attention, and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 142(8), 865–907.
Pascual, E. (2014). Fictive interaction: The conversation frame in thought, language, and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Piata, A. (2019). When time passes quickly: A cognitive linguistic study on compressed time. Metaphor & Symbol, 34(3), 167–184.
Thönes, S., & Stocker, K. (2019). A standard conceptual framework for the study of subjective time. Consciousness and Cognition, 71, 114–122.
Antonioni, M. (Director) (1975). Professione: Reporter [The Passenger]. MGM/Compagnia Cinematografica Champion/Les Films Concordia/ C.I.P.I. Cinematográfica.
