In:Analogy and Contrast in Language: Perspectives from Cognitive Linguistics
Edited by Karolina Krawczak, Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk and Marcin Grygiel
[Human Cognitive Processing 73] 2022
► pp. 61–82
Chapter 3Analogy in action
Space-time, perspectival frames, cultural models
Published online: 27 October 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.73.03gla
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.73.03gla
Abstract
Analogy as structural similarity is assumed to play a fundamental role in human cognition. This study is
concerned with analogies between spatiotemporal orientation, linguistically-coded perspectival frames, and cultural
experience. Two major types of orientational frames, and thus of cultural perspectival frames, are postulated:
egocentric and allocentric. Those, however, may also be combined into complex hybrid configurations. A case study of a
sample of press discourse is offered, where the egocentric, allocentric, and hybrid perspectival frames are shown to
be interwoven. Ultimately, it is hypothesised that the frames can be extrapolated onto the level of conventionalised,
communal perspectives, i.e. cultural models. Analogy is thus shown to be a powerful, robust cognitive mechanism
operating across a variety of domains.
Keywords: analogy, hybrid, immigrant, migrant, press discourse, perspectival frames
Article outline
- 1.Analogy: Definition and background
- 2.From orientation in space-time to linguistically coded conceptualisation
- 2.1Space-time = conceptualisation analogy in Vantage Theory
- 2.2Perspectives in linguistically-coded spatial orientation
- 3.Egocentric vs. allocentric perspectives
- 4.Cultural models and individual minds
- 5.Case study: migrant/immigrant in press discourse
- 6.Conclusions and challenges
Notes References
References (61)
Adorno, T. W. 1998
[1963]. Quasi unafantasia. Essays on modern music. Transl.
Rodney Livingstone. London & New York: Verso.
Antilla, R. 1989
[1972]. Historical and comparative linguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Bartha, P. 2016. Analogy
and analogical reasoning. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The
Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. [URL] (accessed 10 Jan,
2018)
Bennardo, G., & de Munck, V. 2014. Cultural
models: Genesis, methods, and experiences. New York: Oxford University Press.
Blount, B. 2014. Situating
cultural models in history and cognition. In M. Yamaguchi, D. Tay, & B. Blount (Eds.), Approaches
to language, culture, and cognition: The intersection of Cognitive Linguistics and linguistic
anthropology (271–298). Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bühler, K. 1990
[1934]. Theory of language: The representational function of
language. Trans. D. F. Goodwin. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Bybee, J. 2007. Diachronic
linguistics. In D. Geeraerts, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The
Oxford handbook of Cognitive
Linguistics (945–987). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cap, P. 2013. Proximization:
The pragmatics of symbolic distance crossing. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
D’Andrade, R., & Strauss, C. (Eds.) 1995. Human
motives and cultural
models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
de Jongste, H. 2017. Mental
models, communication and culture. Paper at Culture –
Cognition – Communication. (Inter)cultural Perspectives on Language and the
Mind. UMCS, Lublin, Poland, 14–15 Sept
2017.
Dirven, R., Wolf, H.-G., & Polzenhagen, F. 2007. Cognitive
Linguistics and cultural studies. In D. Geeraerts, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The
Oxford handbook of Cognitive
Linguistics (1203–1221). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dokulil, M. 1962. Tvoření
slov v češtině 1. Teorie odvozování
slov. Praha: Nakladatelství Československé akademie věd.
Durkheim, É. 1915
[1912]. The elementary forms of the religious life. Trans. J.
Ward Swain. London: G. Allen and Unwin.
Einstein, A. 1920. Relativity:
The special and general theory. Trans. R. W.
Lawson. New York: Henry Holt. [published in 2000 by Bartleby.com. [URL]; access: 5 Sep,
2017]
Everett, D. L. 2008. Don’t
sleep, there are snakes. Life and language in the Amazonian jungle. New York: Vintage Departures.
Fabiszak, M. 2017. Contesting
memories in text and image: Discursive representation and cognitive
construal. In D. M. Seymour, & M. Camino (Eds.), The
Holocaust in the twenty-first century. Contesting/contested
memories (108–131). New York & London: Routledge.
Gentner, D. 1983. Structure-mapping:
A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive
Science, 7(2), 155–170.
Głaz, A. 2017. Promoting
dialogue. Two traditions in language and culture
research. In J. Ziobro-Strzępek, & W. Chłopicki (Eds.), Across
borders 6. The West looks
East (41–58). Krosno: Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia.
Goddard, C. 2012. Towards
a systematic table of semantic elements. In C. Goddard (Ed.), Cross-linguistic
semantics (59–81). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Grush, R. 2000. Self,
world and space: The meaning and mechanisms of ego- and allocentric spatial
representation. Brain and
Mind, 1, 59–92.
Heine, B., Claudi, U., & Hünnemeyer, F. 1991. Grammaticalization:
A conceptual framework. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Hofstadter, D. 1995. Fluid
concepts and creative analogies: Computer models of the fundamental mechanisms of
thought. New York: Basic Books.
2001. Epilogue:
analogy as the core of cognition. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.), The
analogical mind. Perspectives from cognitive
science (499–538). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Hofstadter, D., & Sander, E. 2013. Surfaces
and essences. Analogy as the fuel and fire of thinking. New York: Basic Books.
Holland, D., & Quinn, N. (Eds.). 1987. Cultural
models in language and
thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Itkonen, E. 1978. Grammatical
theory and metascience. A critical investigation into the methodological and philosophical foundations of
‘autonomous’ linguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
2005. Analogy
as structure and process: Approaches in linguistics, cognitive psychology and philosophy of
science. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Jackendoff, R., Bloom, P., & Wynn, K. (Eds.). 1999. Language,
logic, and concepts. Essays in memory of John Macnamara. Cambridge, MA & London: MIT Press.
Janda, L. 2007. Inflectional
morphology. In D. Geeraerts, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The
Oxford handbook of Cognitive
Linguistics (632–649). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kiparsky, P. 1992. Analogy. In W. Bright (Ed.), International
Encyclopedia of Linguistics, vol. 1.
(56–61). New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kronenfeld, D. B. 2018. Culture
as a system. How we know the meaning and significance of what we do and
say. Abingdon & New York: Routledge.
Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. E. 2000. Where
mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into
being. New York: Basic Books.
Langacker, R. W. 1987. Foundations
of cognitive grammar. Vol. 1. Theoretical
prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
1994. Culture,
cognition, and grammar. In M. Pütz (Ed.), Language
contact and language
conflict (25–53). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
2016b. Nominal
structure in Cognitive Grammar: The Lublin lectures. Ed. A. Głaz, H. Kowalewski, & P. Łozowski. Lublin: Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Press.
This
volume. What could be more fundamental?
Levinson, S. C., & Wilkins, D. P. 2006. Patterns
in the data: Towards a semantic typology of spatial
description. In S. C. Levinson, & D. P. Wilkins (Eds.), Grammars
of space: Explorations in cognitive
diversity (512–552). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
LJS. The Online Liddell-Scott-Jones Greek-English Lexicon at Thesaurus
Linguae Graecae. stephanus.tlg.uci.edu (accessed 4 Sept,
2017)
Lu, Y. 2017. Cultural
conceptualisations of collective self-representation among Chinese
immigrants. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), Advances
in cultural
linguistics (89–110). Singapore: Springer.
MacLaury, R. E. 1997. Color
and cognition in Mesoamerica: Constructing categories as vantages. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
2013. Categorization
as space-time analogy. In A. Głaz, M. L. Moist, & E. Tribushinina (Eds.), Vantage
Theory: A view on language, cognition and
categorization (137–181). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Majid, A., Bowerman, M., Kita, S., Haun, D. B. M., & Levinson, S. C. 2004. Can
language restructure cognition? The case for space. Trends in Cognitive
Sciences, 8(3), 108–114.
Musolff, A. 2015. Dehumanizing
metaphors in UK immigrant debates in press and online media. Journal of
Language Aggression and
Conflict, 3(1), 41–56.
Nishida, H. 2005. Cultural
schema theory. In W. B. Gudynkunst (Ed.), Theorizing
about intercultural
communication (401–418). London & New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Quinn, N. 2011. The
history of the cultural models school reconsidered: A paradigm shift in cognitive
anthropology. In D. B. Kronenfeld, G. Bennardo, V. C. de Munck, & M. D. Fischer (Eds.), A
companion to cognitive
anthropology (31–46). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
Sharifian, F. 2017. Cultural
Linguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Shore, B. 1996. Culture
in mind: Cognition, culture, and the problem of meaning. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2012. Egocentric
and allocentric perspectives in cultural
models. In Ron Sun (Ed.), Grounding
social sciences in cognitive
sciences (89–123). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sowa, J. F. 2005. Categorization
in cognitive computer science. In H. Cohen, & C. Lefebvre (Eds.), Handbook
of categorization in cognitive
science (141–164). Elsevier.
Strauss, C. & Quinn, N. 1995. A
cognitive theory of cultural
meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
