Cover not available

In:Analogy and Contrast in Language: Perspectives from Cognitive Linguistics
Edited by Karolina Krawczak, Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk and Marcin Grygiel
[Human Cognitive Processing 73] 2022
► pp. 1–12

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Introduction

Analogy and contrast in language: Theoretical and empirical insights from Cognitive Linguistics

 | Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań
 | University of Applied Sciences in Konin
 | University of Rzeszow
Published online: 27 October 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.73.00kra
Article outline
  • 1.Introductory remarks
  • 2.Overview of the contributions
  • 3.Concluding remarks
  • References
References (17)
References
Blevins, J. P., & Blevins, J. 2009. Introduction: Analogy in grammar. In J. P. Blevins, & J. Blevins (Eds.), Analogy in grammar: Form and acquisition (1–12). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J. 2006. From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82(4), 711–733. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Saussure, F. 1959. Course in general linguistics. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D. 2010. Theories of lexical semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gentner, D., & Kurtz, K. J. 2006. Relations, objects, and the composition of analogies. Cognitive Science, 30, 609–642. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glynn, D. 2014. Polysemy and synonymy: Cognitive theory and corpus method. In D. Glynn, & J. Robinson (Eds.), Corpus Methods for Semantics. Quantitative studies in polysemy and synonymy (7–38). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hofstadter, D. R. 2001. Epilogue: Analogy as the core of cognition. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (499–538). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holyoak, K. J., Gentner, D., & Kokinov, B. N. 2001. Introduction. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. K. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (1–19). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kokinov, B., & French, R. 2003. Computational models of analogy-making. In L. Nadel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of cognitive science (113–118). London: Nature Publishing Group.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 2. Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1999. Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
This volume. What could be more fundamental?
Markman, A. B., & Stilwell, C. H. 2008. An amicus for the defense: Relational reasoning magnifies the behavioral differences between humans and nonhumans. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(3), 142. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Penn, D. C., Holyoak, K. J., & Povinelli, D, J. 2008. Darwin’s mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(3), 109–178. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tabakowska, E. This volume. Diagrammatic iconicity and rendering time in a narrative text: Analogies and contrasts.
Tomasello, M. 2000. First steps toward a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 61–82.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue