In:Neglected Aspects of Motion-Event Description: Deixis, asymmetries, constructions
Edited by Laure Sarda and Benjamin Fagard
[Human Cognitive Processing 72] 2022
► pp. 189–207
Chapter 9Co-event relations in Swedish motion constructions
Published online: 7 July 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.72.09olo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.72.09olo
Abstract
This paper discusses co-events denoted by verbs used in Swedish motion events. The motion events are analyzed as constructions in the sense of construction grammar, in which the motion component can be argued to be evoked by a syntactic construction rather than by the verb per se.
The manner of motion aspect of motion events has been extensively explored in typological research. The purpose of the paper is to give an overview of co-events often neglected in this research on motion events. Based on empirical findings in large corpora, this paper also focuses on co-event relations other than manner, such as concomitant activities, concurrent results, predicatives and modality.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Motion events in Swedish
- 3.Motion events as motion constructions
- 4.Co-event relations
- 4.1Manner of motion
- 4.2Concurrent result
- 4.3Concomitance
- 4.4Predicative
- 4.5Modality
- 5.Final remarks
Notes Abbreviations References
References (37)
Andersson, E. 1997. Svenska rörelseverb och måladverbial. In S. Haapamäki (Ed.), Svenskan i Finland 4 (35–50). Skrifter från svenska institutionen vid Åbo Akademi Nr. 3. Åbo: Åbo universitet.
Andersson, P. 2007. Modalitet och förändring. En studie av må och kunna i fornsvenska. GNS. Diss. University of Gothenburg.
Baayen, H., & Lieber, R. 1991. Productivity and English derivation: A corpus-based study. Linguistics, 29, 801–44.
Barðdal, J. 2008. Productivity. Evidence from case and argument structure in Icelandic. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Bourdin, P. 1996. On Goal-bias across languages: modal, configurational and orientational parameters. In B. Palek (Ed.), Typology: Prototypes, item orderings and universals (185–218). Prague: Charles University Press.
Diessel, H. 2015. Usage-based construction grammar. In E. Dąbrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (296–322). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Fried, M. 2015. Construction Grammar. In A. Alexiadou & T. Kiss (Eds.), Syntax – Theory and Analysis (974–1003). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Goldberg, A. 1995. Constructions. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
2006. Constructions at Work. The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
Israel, M. 1996. The way constructions grow. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language (217–230). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Kjellmer, G. 2002. Must down: On non-occurring verbs of motion in Modern English. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 1(2), 339–353.
Levin, B. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations. A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
Michaelis, L. A. 2005. Entity and Event Coercion in a Symbolic Theory of Syntax. In J.-O. Östman & M. Fried, (Eds.), Construction Grammar(s): Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions (45–87). Constructional Approaches to Language, Volume 3. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Nikanne, U., & Östman, J.-O. 2006. Finland-Swedish directionality in conceptual semantics and in construction grammar: A methodological dialogue. In M. Suominen & A. Arppe (Eds.), A man of measure – Festschrift in honour of Fred Karlsson on his 60th birthday (66–86). Turku: SKY Journal of Linguistics. Volume 19.
Olofsson, J. 2014. Argument structure constructions and syntactic productivity – The case of Swedish motion constructions. Constructions, 1(7), 1–17.
2017. Förhållandet mellan rörelseverb och förflyttningskonstruktioner – lexikogrammatisk associationskraft och produktivitet [‘The relationship between motion verbs and motion constructions – lexicogrammatical attraction and productivity’]. Norsk lingvistisk tidsskrift, 35(1), 87–107.
2018. Förflyttning på svenska. Om syntaktisk produktivitet utifrån ett konstruktionsperspektiv [‘Motion in Swedish – on productivity from a construction grammar perspective’]. GNS. Diss. University of Gothenburg.
2019. Frekvens som mått på produktivitet – en konstruktionsgrammatisk undersökning av förflyttningskonstruktioner i svenskan [‘Frequency as a measure of productivity – a construction grammar study of motion constructions in Swedish’]. Språk & Stil, 29, 168–202.
Özçalışkan, S. 2004. Typological variation in encoding the manner, path, and ground components of a metaphorical motion event. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 2, 73–102.
Sjögreen, C. 2015. Kasta bort bollen och äta bort sin huvudvärk. En studie av argumentstrukturen i kausativa bort-konstruktioner. [‘The argument structure of Swedish causative bort-constructions’]. Diss. Uppsala: Uppsala universitet.
Slobin, D. I. 1996. Two ways to travel: verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Essays in Semantics (195–317). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2004. The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating Events in Narrative: Vol. 2. Typological and Contextual Perspectives (219–257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Stefanowitsch, A. 2013. Collostructional analysis. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar (290–306). Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
Strömqvist, S., & Ragnarsdóttir, H. 2004. Time, Space and Manner in Icelandic and Swedish. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating Events in Narrative: Vol. 2. Typological and Contextual Perspectives (113–141). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Talmy, L. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics Vol.2: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
2017a. Neglected Aspects of the Motion System. Talk presented at the workshop Neglected Aspects of Motion-Event Description (NAMED), 19–20 of May 2017, École normale supérieure, Paris. [URL]
2017b. Foreword: Past, present, and future of motion research. In I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano (Ed.), Motion and space across languages and applications (1–12). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Teleman, U., Hellberg, S., & Andersson, E. 1999. Svenska Akademiens Grammatik [‘The Swedish Academy Grammar’]. Stockholm: Norstedts.
Viberg, Å. 2013a. Ord om konsten att förflytta sig: Svenskans gå, åka och köra i tvärspråkligt perspektiv [Words about the manner of motion: Swedish go, ride and drive in a contrastive perspective]. In B. Lindblom (Ed.), Text, tal & tecken. Några perspektiv inom språkforskningen [Text, speech and sign: Some perspectives in language research]. [KVHAA Konferenser 83] (116–138). Stockholm: Kungl. Vitterhets Historie och Antikvitets Akademien (KVHAA).
2013b. Seeing the lexical profile of Swedish through multilingual corpora. The case of Swedish åka and other vehicle verbs. In K. Aijmer & B. Altenberg (Eds.), Advances in corpus-based contrastive linguistics. Studies in honour of Stig Johansson (25–56). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Vikner, S. 1988. Modals in Danish and event expressions. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax, 39, 1–33.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
