In:Neglected Aspects of Motion-Event Description: Deixis, asymmetries, constructions
Edited by Laure Sarda and Benjamin Fagard
[Human Cognitive Processing 72] 2022
► pp. 69–94
Chapter 4Deictic directionals revisited in the light of advances in typology
Published online: 7 July 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.72.04lam
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.72.04lam
Abstract
This study explores the issue of Associated Motion (hereafter AM) in five languages spoken in Africa and Asia. We investigate grammatical morphemes whose function is to add a motion process to the event encoded in the verb expressing the main (non-motion) event, and to specify the temporal sequence of these two events (motion-prior-to-action or motion-subsequent-to-action). We show that an AM analysis adequately accounts for the function of morphemes previously considered as directionals in Wolof and Burmese, whereas in Sereer, Northern Mandarin and Japanese, AM markers are concurring with morphemes marking deictic orientation. Our results support recent studies showing that AM is a widespread linguistic phenomenon, and thus raise the question of the place of AM in a typology of motion events.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction: Understudied aspects of dynamic deixis
- 2.Deictic orientation and deictic directionals
- 2.1The relative autonomy of the deictic component
- 2.2Deictic orientation: A few examples
- 3.Associated motion and deictic orientation
- 3.1Associated motion as a “cross-linguistically valid conceptual category”
- 3.2The subfunctions of Associated Motion discussed in this study
- 3.3Associated Motion in Burmese and Wolof
- 3.4When the same forms function as deictic directionals and as AM markers
- 3.4.1The motion-prior-to-action subtype: Sereer and Northern Mandarin
- 3.4.2The motion-subsequent-to-action subtype: Japanese
- 3.4.3Deictic orientation markers and AM markers: A summary
- 4.Discussion of a few specific issues related to AM
- 4.1The inventory of AM markers
- 4.1.1Dynamic deixis
- 4.1.2Motion back (home)
- 4.1.3“Roundtrip” motion
- 4.2Source for AM markers and grammaticalization paths
- 4.3Argument structure of a complex verb including an AM marker
- 4.4Foregrounded actions vs. backgrounded motion
- 4.1The inventory of AM markers
- 5.To conclude: Some perspectives for further research
Acknowledgements Notes Abbreviations used in the glosses References
References (49)
Alamin, S., Schneider-Blum, G., & Dimmendaal, G. 2012. Finding your way in Tima. In A. Mietzner & U. Claudi (Eds.), Directionality in Grammar and Discourse: Case Studies from Africa (9–33). Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.
Alonso de la Fuente, J. A., & Jacques, G. 2018. Associated motion in Manchu in typological perspective. Language and Linguistics, 19(4), 501–524.
Belkadi, A. 2015. Associated motion with deictic directionals: A comparative overview. Soas Working Papers in Linguistics, 17, 49–76.
Bourdin, P. 2005. “Aller” et “venir” en somali : mise en perspective généalogique et typologique. In A. Lonnet & A. Mettouchi (Eds.), Faits de langues, 26: Les langues chamito-sémitiques et afro-asiatiques, 1, 247–258.
2006. The marking of Directional Deixis in Somali. How typologically idiosyncratic is it? In F. K. E. Voeltz (Ed.), Studies in African Linguistic Typology (13–41). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
This volume. On a few instances where deictic directionals confound expectations.
Craig, [Grinevald] C. 1993. Jakaltek directionals: their meaning and their function. Languages of the World, 7, 23–36.
Creissels, D., & Bassène, A. C. 2021. Ventive, associated motion and aspect in Jóola Fóoñi (Atlantic). In A. Guillaume & H. Koch (Eds.), Associated motion. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Dhorne, F. 2005. Aspect et temps en japonais. (Bibliothèque de Faits de Langue). Gap & Paris: Ophrys.
Fillmore, C. 1992. “Corpus linguistics” or “Computer-aided armchair linguistics”. In J. Svartvik (Ed.), Directions in Corpus Linguistics: Proceedings from a 1991 Nobel Symposium on Corpus Computational Linguistics, 40(3), 35–66. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Fortis, J.-M., & Fagard, B. 2010. Space and language. Leipzig Summer School on Linguistic Typology (August 14–28, 2010). Retrieved from [URL]
Grinevald, C. 2011a. The expression of path in Jakaltek Popti’ (Mayan): When directionals do it all. In R. Gutiérrez-Bravo, L. Mikkelsen & E. Potsdam (Eds.), Representing Language: Essays in honor of Judith Aissen (89–104). Santa Cruz, California: Linguistics Research Center.
2011b. On constructing a working typology of the expression of path. Cahiers de Faits de langues, 3, 43–70.
Guillaume, A. 2006. La catégorie du mouvement associé en cavineña : apport à une typologie de l’encodage du mouvement et de la trajectoire. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, 1, 417–438.
2016. Associated motion in South America: typological and areal perspectives. Linguistic Typology, 20(1), 81–177.
Guillaume, A., & Koch, H. 2021. Introduction: Associated Motion as a grammatical category in linguistic typology. In A. Guillaume & H. Koch (Eds.), Associated motion (3–30). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Imbert, C., Grinevald, C., & Sörés, A. 2011. Pour une catégorie de ‘satellite’ de Trajectoire dans une approche fonctionnelle-typologique, Cahiers de Faits de langues, 3, 99–116.
Jacques, G. 2013. Harmonization and disharmonization of affix ordering and basic word order. Linguistic Typology, 17, 187–215.
Jacques, G., Lahaussois, A., & Zhang, S. 2021. Associated motion in Sino-Tibetan, with a focus on Gyalrongic and Kiranti. In A. Guillaume & H. Koch (Eds.), Associated motion (819–853). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Jamassy, Group. 1998/2015. Nihongo bunkei jiten. Tokyo: Kurosio. [An English edition was published in 2015 under the title A Handbook of Japanese Grammar Patterns for Teachers and Learners, under the supervision of Y. Sunakawa & P. Ishida.]
Kerke, S. van de, & Muysken, P. 1990. Quechua mu and the perspective of the speaker. In H. Pinkster & I. Genee (Eds.), Unity in diversity: papers presented to Simon C. Dik on his 50th birthday (151–164). Dordrecht: De Gruyter.
Koch, H. 1984. The category of ‘Associated Motion’ in Kaytej. Language in Central Australia, 1, 23–34.
Lamarre, C. 2003. Hànyŭ kōngjiān wèiyí de yŭyán biăodá [The Linguistic Expression of Motion Events in Chinese]. Contemporary Research in Modern Chinese (Xiàndài Zhōngguóyǔ Yánjiū), 5, 1–18. (Kyoto: Hooyuu Shoten).
2008. The Linguistic Categorization of Deictic Direction in Chinese: With Reference to Japanese. In D. Xu (Ed.), Space in Languages of China: Cross-linguistic, synchronic and diachronic perspectives (69–97). Berlin, Heidelberg & New York: Springer.
2020. An Associated Motion Approach to Northern Mandarin motion-cum-purpose Patterns. In J. Xing (Ed.), A Typological Approach to Grammaticalization and Lexicalization: East meets West (131–163). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Matsumoto, Y. 1996. Complex Predicates in Japanese: A Syntactic and Semantic Study of the Notion ‘Word’, Stanford: CSLI Publications & Tokyo: Kurosio.
2017. Idō hyōgen no seishitsu to sono ruikeisei [The nature and types of motion expressions]. In Matsumoto (Ed.) Idō yōgen no ruikeiron [A Typology of Motion Events] (337–353). Tokyo: Kurosio.
Morita, T. 2011. Intratypological Variations in Motion Events in Japanese and French: Manner and Deixis as Parameters for Cross-Linguistic Comparison. CogniTextes 6. Retrieved on April 30, 2017 from [URL];
Moriyama, T. 1988. Nihongo dooshi jutsugobun no kenkyuu [A Study of Japanese Verbal Predicative Sentences]. Tokyo: Meiji Sho’in.
Moyse-Faurie, C. 2016. Te lea faka’uvea / Le wallisien. Leuven: Peeters (coll. Les langues du monde 7).
O’Connor, L. 2004. Going getting tired: Associated motion through space and time in lowland Chontal. In M. Achard & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Language, culture and mind (181–198). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Ozanne-Rivierre, F. 2004. Spatial deixis in Iaai (Loyalty Islands). In G. Senft (Ed.), Deixis and Demonstratives in Oceanic Languages (129–139). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Pakendorf, B., & Stoynova, N. 2021. Associated motion in Tungusic languages: A case of mixed argument structure. In A. Guillaume & H. Koch (Eds.), Associated Motion (855–897). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Renaudier, M. 2012. Dérivation et valence en sereer, Variété de Mar Lodj (Sénégal). Doctoral dissertation, Université Lumière Lyon2.
Rose, F. 2015. Associated motion in Mojeño Trinitario: Some typological considerations. Folia Linguistica, 49(1), 117–158.
Shibatani, M. 2007. Grammaticalization of converb constructions: The case of Japanese -te conjunctive constructions. In J. Rehbein, C. Hohenstein & L. Pietsch (Eds.), Connectivity in Grammar and Discourse (21–49). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Slobin, D. I. 1997. The Universal, the Typological, and the Particular in Acquisition. In D. Slobin (Ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition. Vol. 5: Expanding the Contexts (1–39). Mahwah & London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Talmy, L. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: semantic structures in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Grammatical categories and the lexicon (57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics Vol. 2. Typology and process in Concept Structuring, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Tan, A. 2014. Les verbes de trajectoire déictique dans le dialecte de Chaozhou, Chine. In J. Bardet, A. Baudrillart, L. Metz, A. Roderon, L. Toua, I. Rousset & E. Kogkitsidou. Colloque international des étudiants chercheurs en didactique des langues et en linguistique (CEDIL14, Grenoble, France). Retrieved from [URL]
Vittrant, A. 2013. Modalité et temporalité en birman vernaculaire : l’exemple du développement modal du morphème spatio-temporel /khɛ1/. In W. De Mulder, J. Mortelmans & T. Mortelmans (Eds.), Cahiers Chronos 26: Marqueurs temporels et modaux en usage (269–291). Amsterdam & New York: Rodopi.
2015. Expressing Motion: The Contribution of Southeast Asian languages with reference to East Asian Languages. In N. Enfield & B. Comrie (Eds.), Languages of Mainland Southeast Asia: The State of the Art (586–632). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Voisin, S. 2013. Expressions de trajectoire dans quelques langues atlantiques. In C. Chauvin (Ed.), Faits de Langues. Sémantique des relations spatiales, 42, 131–152.
Vuillermet, M. 2012. Une typologie en cheminement: contribution de l’ese ejja à l’étude du mouvement associé. Lidil 46, 79–99. Retrieved from [URL].
2013. Spatial obsession in the Ese Ejja verbal domain: A look at its “associated motion” system. Paper presented at the Fieldwork Forum, Department of Linguistics, University of California at Berkeley (January 23, 2013).
Weber, D. 1989. A Grammar of Huallaga (Huánuco) Quechua. Berkeley, Los Angeles & London: University of California Press.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Phan, Trang, Bianca Basciano & Lan Chu
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
