In:Collocations as a Language Resource: A functional and cognitive study in English phraseology
Sonja Poulsen
[Human Cognitive Processing 71] 2022
► pp. xiii–xiv
Published online: 8 April 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.71.lof
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.71.lof
List of figures
Figure 1.Overlapping lexical sets
10
Figure 2.Integrated levels of meaning
37
Figure 3.A scale of idiomaticity
49
Figure 4.A modified variant of Bühler’s Organon Model
96
Figure 5.Proposal for a complex notion of image schema
126
Figure 6.Different meanings or different active zones
139
Figure 7.A partial network for open
140
Figure 8.Full-verb vs. support-verb readings of hold
143
Figure 9.Distribution of data by construction type
147
Figure 10.break domains
149
Figure 11.Subdomain: Artefacts and natural things (damage)
150
Figure 12.Subdomain: Body parts
151
Figure 13.Collocations using object event-structure
161
Figure 14.Collocations using location event-structure
162
Figure 15.Construction types in two domains
169
Figure 16.Proposed readings of break
176
Figure 17.Blueprint for Figures 21–31
177
Figure 18.‘Damaging physical objects’ & ‘violation of social institutions and constructs’
178
Figure 19.Specific ways of breaking physical objects’ & ‘social institutions & constructs’
181
Figure 20.‘Overcoming physical and psychological barriers’
182
Figure 21.‘Opening physical and metaphorical containers’
184
Figure 22.‘Damaging body parts’ & ‘causing psychological damage’
186
Figure 23.‘Interrupting an activity’ &’ changing from a way of doing something’
190
Figure 24.‘Starting an activity & changing to a new way of doing something’
190
Figure 25.‘Interrupting visual experience’ & ‘Interrupting an abstract (visual) pattern’
191
Figure 26.‘Interrupting auditory experience’ & ‘Interrupting an abstract (auditory) pattern’
193
Figure 27.‘Interrupting a physical state’ & ‘Interrupting a psychological state’
196
Figure 28.Readings of break: revised proposal
198
Figure 29.break as a complex category
200
Figure 30.Distribution of data by construction type
203
Figure 31.appointment domains
204
Figure 32.Subdomain: Social institutions & constructs (‘arrangement for a meeting’)
206
Figure 33.Subdomain: Social institutions & constructs (‘position’)
206
Figure 34.Object event-structure in two appointment domains
216
Figure 35.Location event-structure in appointment domain (‘arranging/arrangement for a meeting’)
219
Figure 36.Past participles of basic-level verbs as premodifiers
225
Figure 37.Basic-level predications in two appointment domains (by number of occurrence)
228
Figure 38.Schematic frame appointment I: ‘arranging/arrangement for a meeting’
231
Figure 39.Schematic frames appointment II: ‘placing sb in a position’ + ‘position’
235
Figure 40.appointment as a complex category and a network of meanings
239
Figure 41.The composite structure break an-appointment
241
Figure 42.A/D alignment of break an-appointment construed as an entrenched collocation
248
Figure 43.A/D alignment of break an-appointment construed as a free combination
248
Figure 44.A taxonomy of verb + nominal object combinations based on relative salience
255
Figure 45.The frame semantics of support verbs I (based on Fillmore et al. 2002, Section 4.2)
263
Figure 46.The frame semantics of support verbs II (based on Fillmore 2003: slides
51–66)
263
Figure 47.Collocations in the traditional phraseological framework
302
Figure 48.Collocations in a functional and cognitive framework
303
