In:Broader Perspectives on Motion Event Descriptions
Edited by Yo Matsumoto and Kazuhiro Kawachi
[Human Cognitive Processing 69] 2020
► pp. 143–180
Chapter 5A fine-grained analysis of manner salience
Experimental evidence from Japanese and English
Published online: 11 August 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.69.05aki
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.69.05aki
Abstract
This chapter delves into the typological
discussion of “manner salience” (Slobin 2004, 2006) by means of a fine-grained examination of
different kinds of manner expressions. Our two speech elicitation
experiments revealed that English speakers are clearly more manner
salient than Japanese in the use of the “default” general manner
expression (i.e. walk) in describing human walking
motion. On the other hand, Japanese speakers use mimetic adverbs
which significantly contribute to the expressive power of manner
expressions, especially in describing the sounds that moving
entities make. These results indicate that manner salience is a
complex phenomenon that involves multiple parameters in the form and
meaning of manner expressions, rather than a mere epiphenomenon of
the typology based on path coding positions.
Keywords: expressiveness, frog stories, ideophones, mimetics, sounds of motion, video experiment
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The typology of manner expressions
- 2.1Manner
- 2.2Manner salience
- 2.3Types of manner expressions
- 3.Experiment 1: Frog stories
- 3.1Method
- 3.2Results
- 3.3Discussion
- 4.Experiment 2: Motion with sounds
- 4.1Method
- 4.2Results
- 4.3Discussion
- 5.Typological implications
- 6.Conclusion
Acknowledgements Notes Abbreviations References
References (64)
Akita, K. 2017. The
typology of manner expressions: A preliminary
look. In I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano (Ed.), Motion
and space across languages: Theory and
applications (39–60). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Akita, K., Matsumoto, Y., & Ohara, K. H. 2010. Idoo-hyoogen no ruikeiron ni okeru
tyokuziteki-keiro-hyoogen to
yootai-goi-repaatorii [Deictic path expressions and manner lexicon in
the typology of motion
expressions]. In T. Kageyama (Ed.), Lexicon
Forum, No. 5 (1–25). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
Beavers, J., & Koontz-Garboden, A. 2017. Result
verbs, scalar change, and the typology of motion
verbs. Language, 93, 842–876.
Berthele, R. 2013. Disentangling
manner and path: Evidence from varieties of German and
Romance. In J. Goschler & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Variation
and change in the coding of motion
events (55–75). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Boas, H. C. 2008. Toward
a frame-constructional approach to verb
classification. Revista
Canaria de Estudios
Ingleses, 57, 17–48.
Cardini, F.-E. 2008. Manner
of motion saliency: An inquiry into
Italian. Cognitive
Linguistics, 19(4), 533–569.
Chen, Y.-T., & Matsumoto, Y. 2018. Nihongo-goiteki-hukugoo-doosi no imi to
taikei: Konsutorakusyon-keitairon to
hureemu-imiron [The meaning and system of lexical compound verbs in
Japanese: Construction morphology and frame
semantics]. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
Dingemanse, M. 2011. The
meaning and use of ideophones in
Siwu. Ph.D.
dissertation, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics & Radboud University.
2017. Expressiveness
and system integration: On the typology of ideophones, with
special reference to
Siwu. STUF, 70(2), 363–384.
Dingemanse, M., & Akita, K. 2017. An
inverse relation between expressiveness and grammatical
integration: On the morphosyntactic typology of ideophones,
with special reference to
Japanese. Journal of
Linguistics, 53(3), 501–532.
Doyle, A. C. 1892. The
adventures of Sherlock
Holmes. (K. Nobuhara, trans., 1953. Syaarokku
Hoomuzu no
booken.) Tokyo: Shinchosha.
Fillmore, C. J. 1975. An
alternative to checklist theories of
meaning. Proceedings of the
First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics
Society, 123–131.
Fortis, J. M., Grinevald, C., Kopecka, A., & Vittrant, A. 2011. L’expression
de la trajectoire: perspectives
typologiques. Faits de Langues, 38, 33–41.
Goldberg, A. E., & Jackendoff, R. 2004. The
English resultatives as a family of
constructions. Language, 80, 532–568.
Hinton, L., Nichols, J., & Ohala, J. J. 1994. Sound
symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2009a. Lexicalisation
patterns and sound symbolism in
Basque. In J. Valenzuela, A. Rojo, & C. Soriano (Eds.), Trends
in cognitive linguistics: Theoretical and applied
models (239–254). Hamburg: Peter Lang.
2009b. Path
salience in motion
events. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura, & Ş. Özçalışkan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic
approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the
tradition of Dan Isaac
Slobin (403–414). New York: Psychology Press.
Iwata, S. 2006. Where
there’s a sound, there’s motion: Two types of path PPs that
appear after verbs of sound
emission. Paper presented at
the Fourth International
Conference of Construction Grammar, University of
Tokyo, 3 September
2006.
Jackendoff, R. 1985. Multiple
subcategorization and the theta-criterion: The case of
climb. Natural
Language and Linguistic
Theory, 3, 271–295.
Kakehi, H., Tamori, I., & Schourup, L. 1996. Dictionary
of iconic expressions in
Japanese. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Koga, H. 2017. Niti-ei-doku-ro-go no ziritu-idoo-hyoogen:
Taiyaku-koopasu o motiita
hikaku-kenkyuu [Self-motion expressions in Japanese, English,
German, and Russian: A comparative study using translation
corpora]. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.), Idoo-hyoogen no
ruikeiron [The
typology of motion
expressions] (303–336). Tokyo: Kurosio.
Kopecka, A., & Narasimhan, B. (Eds.) 2012. Events
of putting and taking: A crosslinguistic
perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Levin, B. 1993. English
verb classes and alternations: A preliminary
investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levin, B., Song, G., & Atkins, B. T. S. 1997. Making
sense of corpus data: A case study of verbs of
sound. International Journal
of Corpus
Linguistics, 2, 23–64.
Malt, B. C., Ameel, E., Imai, M., Gennari, S. P., Saji, N., & Majid, A. 2014. Human
locomotion in languages: Constraints on moving and
meaning. Journal of Memory
and
Language, 74, 107–123.
Marchman, V., & Renner, T. 2010. Frogs
English Slobin
Corpus. TalkBank. [URL]
Matsumoto, Y. 1997. Kuukan-idoo no gengo-hyoogen to sono
kakutyoo [Linguistic expressions of motion in space and their
extensions]. In S. Tanaka & Y. Matsumoto, Kuukan to idoo no
hyoogen [Expressions of space and
motion], 125–230. Tokyo: Kenkyusha.
2003. Typologies
of lexicalization patterns and event integration:
Clarifications and
reformulations. In S. Chiba et al. (Eds.), Empirical
and theoretical investigations into language: A Festschrift
for Masaru
Kajita (403–417). Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
2017. Nihongo ni okeru zisyoo-hyoogen-taipu to keiro
no hyoogen [Event-based expression types and expressions
of path in
Japanese] (247–273). In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.), Idoo-hyoogen no
ruikeiron [The
typology of motion
expressions]. Tokyo: Kurosio.
2018. Motion
event descriptions in Japanese from typological
perspectives. In P. Pardeshi & T. Kageyama (Eds.), Handbook
of Japanese contrastive
linguistics. Berlin: Mouton.
Matsumoto, Y., Akita, K., Andreani, F., Eguchi, K., Imazato, N., Kawachi, K., Matsuse, I., Nagaya, N., Morita, T., Takahashi, K., Takahashi, R. & Yoshinari, Y. 2013. Crosslinguistic
tendencies in the intralinguistic variations of motion
descriptions: An experimental study of manner, path, and
deixis. Presented at
the 12th International Cognitive
Linguistics Conference, University of
Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta,
Canada, 28 June
2013.
Matsumoto, Y., Akita, K. & Takahashi, K. 2017. The
functional nature of deictic verbs and the coding patterns
of Deixis: An experimental study in English, Japanese, and
Thai. In I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano (Ed.), Motion
and space across languages and
applications (95–122). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Matsuse, I. This
volume. The distinct coding
of Deixis and Path in Kathmandu
Newar.
Meyer, G. F., & Wuerger, S. M. 2001. Cross-modal
integration of auditory and visual motion
signals. Neuroreport, 12, 2557–2560.
Morita, T. This
volume. Attraction of attention in perceived motion events
weighed against typology and cognitive cost: An experimental
study of French.
Nuckolls, J. B. 1996. Sounds
like life: Sound-symbolic grammar, performance, and
cognition in Pastaza
Quechua. New York: Oxford University Press.
Oh, K.-J. 2003. Language,
cognition, and development: Motion events in English and
Korean. Ph.D.
dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Ohara, K. H. 2002. Linguistic
encodings of motion events in Japanese and English: A
preliminary look. The Hiyoshi
Review of English
Studies, 41, 122–153. Keio University.
Özçalışkan, Ş., & Slobin, D. I. 2000. Expression
of manner of movement in mono-lingual and bilingual adult
narratives: Turkish vs.
English. In A. Göksel & C. Kerslake (Eds.), Studies
on Turkish and Turkic
languages (253–262). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
Schaefer, R. P. 2001. Ideophonic
adverbs and manner gaps in
Emai. In F. K. E. Voeltz & C. Kilian-Hatz (Eds.), Ideophone (339–354). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Sekuler, R., Sekuler, A. B., & Lau, R. 1997. Sound
alters visual motion
perception. Nature, 385, 308–308.
Slobin, D. I. 1996. Two
ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and
Spanish. In M. Shibatani & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical
constructions: Their form and
meaning. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
1997. Mind,
code, and
text. In J. Bybee, J. Haiman, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Essays
on language function and language type: Dedicated to T.
Givón (437–467). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
2000. Verbalized
events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and
determinism. In S. Niemeier & R. Dirven (Eds.), Evidence
for linguistic
relativity (107–138). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2004. The
many ways to search for a
frog. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating
events in narrative: Typological and contextual
perspectives (219–257). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2006. What
makes manner of motion salient?: Explorations in linguistic
typology, discourse, and
cognition. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds.), Space
in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive
categories (59–81). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Slobin, D. I., Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., Kopecka, A., & Majid, A. 2014. Manners
of human gait: A crosslinguistic event-naming
study. Cognitive
Linguistics, 25(4), 701–741.
Snell-Hornby, M. 1983. Verb-descriptivity
in German and English: A contrastive study in semantic
fields. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.
Sugiyama, Y. 2005. Not
all verb-framed languages are created equal: The case of
Japanese. Proceedings of the
Thirty-First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics
Society, 299–310.
Talmy, L. 1991. Path
to realization: A typology of event
conflation. Proceedings of
the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics
Society, 480–519.
2000. Toward
a cognitive semantics, Volume II: Typology and process in
concept
structuring. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Tamura, Y.-S. 2006. Characteristics
of English sound-emission path construction: A prototype
cross-linguistic
account. In M. Yamanashi (Ed.), Studies
in cognitive
linguistics 5 (209–242). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
Toratani, K. 2012. The
role of sound-symbolic forms in Motion event descriptions:
The case of Japanese. Review
of Cognitive
Linguistics, 10(1), 90–132.
Tsujimura, N., & Deguchi, M. 2007. Semantic
integration of mimetics in
Japanese. Papers from the
Twenty-Ninth Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic
Society, 339–353.
Verkerk, A. 2013. Scramble,
scurry and dash: The
correlation between motion event encoding and manner verb
lexicon size in
Indo-European. Language
Dynamics and
Change, 3, 169–217.
Voeltz, F. K. E., & Kilian-Hatz, C. (Eds.) 2001. Ideophones. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Wienold, G. 1995. Lexical
and conceptual structures in expressions for movement and
space: With reference to Japanese, Korean, Thai, and
Indonesian as compared to English and
German. In U. Egli, P. Pause, C. Schwarze, A. von Stechow, & G. Wienold (Eds.), Lexical
knowledge in the organization of
language (301–340). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Glukhova, Olga & Olga
Spring, Ryan
Menete, Sérgio N. & Guiying Jiang
Taremaa, Piia, Johanna Kiik, Leena Karin Toots & Ann Veismann
Taremaa, Piia & Anetta Kopecka
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
