Cover not available

In:Broader Perspectives on Motion Event Descriptions
Edited by Yo Matsumoto and Kazuhiro Kawachi
[Human Cognitive Processing 69] 2020
► pp. 2540

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (31)
References
Blomberg, J. 2014. The expression of non-actual motion in Swedish, French and Thai. Cognitive Linguistics, 26(4), 657–696. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cappelle, B. This volume. Looking into visual motion expressions in Dutch, English, and French: How languages stick to well-trodden typological paths.
Choi, S., & Bowerman, M. 1991. Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition, 41, 83–121. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W., Barðdal, J., Hollmann, W., Sotirova, V., & Taoka, C. 2010. Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions. In H. Boas (Ed.), Contrastive studies in construction grammar (201–236). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeLancey, S. 1980. Deictic categories in the Tibeto-Burman verb. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Indiana University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1985. The analysis-synthesis-lexis cycle in Tibeto-Burman: A case study in motivated change. In J. Haiman (Ed.), Iconicity in syntax (367–389). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. 1997. Lectures on deixis. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hale, A., & Shrestha, K. P. 2006. Newār (Nepāl Bhāsā). [Language of the World/Materials 256]. Munich: LINCOM GmbH.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hargreaves, D. J. 2003. Kathmandu Newar (Nepāl Bhāsā). In G. Thurgood & R. LaPolla (Eds.), Sino-Tibetan Languages (371–384). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004. Directional prefixes in Kathmandu Newar. In A. Saxena (Ed.), Himalayan languages: Past and present 2 [Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs 149] (273–284). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2017. Kathmandu Newar (Nepāl Bhāsā). In G. Thurgood & R. LaPolla (Eds.), Sino-Tibetan Languages, 2nd ed. (453–467). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Honda, I. 2004. Grammaticalization of deictic motion verbs in Seke. In A. Saxena (Ed.), Himalayan languages: Past and present 2 [Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs 149] (285–310). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Im, S.-C.. 2001. Typological patterns of motion verbs in Korean. Ph.D. dissertation, University at Buffalo, State University of New York.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kansakar, T., Ishii, H., & Kiryu, K. 2002. Conversation in Newar. Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and African. Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kawachi, K. This volume. Should Talmy’s motion typology be expanded to visual motion? An investigation into expressions of motion, agentive motion, and visual motion in Sidaama (Sidamo).
Kölver, U., & Shresthacarya, I. 1994. A dictionary of contemporary Newar. Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malla, K. P. 1985. The Newari language: A working outline [Numenta Serindica 14]. Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa. Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Y. 2003. Typologies of lexicalization patterns and event integration: Clarifications and reformulations. In S. Chiba et al. (Eds.), Empirical and theoretical investigations into language: A festschrift for Masaru Kajita (403–418). Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2017. Idoo-hyoogen no ruikei ni kansuru kadai [Problems in the Typology of Motion Expressions]. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.) Idoo-hyoogen no ruikeiron [The typology of motion expressions] (1–24). Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2018. Motion event descriptions in Japanese: Typological perspectives. In P. Pardeshi & T. Kageyama (Eds.), Handbook of Japanese contrastive linguistics (273–289). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Y., and Kawachi, K. This volume. Introduction: Motion event descriptions in broader perspective.
Matsumoto, Y. This volume. Neutral and specialized path coding: Toward a new typology of path-coding devices and languages.
Matsuse, I. 2017. Newaru-go no idoo-hyoogen [Motion expressions in Newar]. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.) Idoo-hyoogen no ruikeiron [The typology of motion expressions] (65–94). Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shakya, D. R. 1992. Nominal and verbal morphology in six dialects of Newari. M.A. thesis, University of Oregon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. 2004. The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expressions of motion events. In S. Stromqvist & S. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narratives: Typological and contextual perspectives (219–259). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. 1976. Semantic causative types. In M. Shibatani (Ed.), Syntax and semantics 6: The grammar of causative constructions (43–116). New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1985a. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description Vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1985b. Force dynamics in language and thought. Papers from the Twenty-First Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 293–337.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1991. Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 480–517. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2000. Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilkins, D. P. & Hill, D. 1995. When “go” means “come”: Questioning the basicness of basic motion verbs. Cognitive Linguistics, 6, 209–259. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Matsumoto, Yo, Kimi Akita, Anna Bordilovskaya, Kiyoko Eguchi, Hiroaki Koga, Miho Mano, Ikuko Matsuse, Takahiro Morita, Naonori Nagaya, Kiyoko Takahashi, Ryosuke Takahashi & Yuko Yoshinari
2022. Linguistic representations of visual motion. In Neglected Aspects of Motion Events Description [Human Cognitive Processing, 72],  pp. 43 ff. DOI logo
Osswald, Rainer & Robert D. Van Valin
2022. The description of transitive directed motion in Lakhota (Siouan). In Neglected Aspects of Motion Events Description [Human Cognitive Processing, 72],  pp. 209 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue