Cover not available

In:Cognitive Linguistics and the Study of Chinese
Edited by Dingfang Shu, Hui Zhang and Lifei Zhang
[Human Cognitive Processing 67] 2019
► pp. 261–284

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 9
The role of metaphor in categorization

A time course study

 | Jiangsu Ocean University
 | South China Normal University
Published online: 20 November 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.67.11gon
This study is concerned with the processing of metaphor in real time for the purpose of elucidating metaphor categorization. We distinguish between attributive metaphors such as the surface of the lake is a mirror, in which the attributes of a lake are likened to those of a mirror, and conceptually complex relational metaphors like history is a mirror, which exhibit a structural resemblance between the topic history and the metaphorical vehicle mirror. We conducted an experiment that provided evidence that for attributive metaphors only literal meanings of the vehicle are activated, while in relational metaphors they are activated only for 300 ms, but then actively suppressed. Our experimental data suggest that, for relational metaphors, structure-mapping and schema induction underlie metaphorical categorization.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical assumptions
    • 2.1Attributive similarity vs. relational similarity
    • 2.2Schema induction as categorization
  • 3.Working hypotheses
  • 4.The experiment
    • 4.1Research aim
    • 4.2Method
      • 4.2.1Participants
      • 4.2.2Design
      • 4.2.3Material development
        • A.Manipulation of priming metaphor similarity
        • B.Manipulation of target words
    • 4.3Procedure
  • 5.Results
  • 6.Discussion
  • Notes
  • References
References (51)
References
Barr, R. A., & Caplan, L. J. 1987. Category representations and their implications for category structure. Memory and Cognition, 15, 397–418. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bassok, M., & Holyoak, K. J. 1989. Interdomain transfer between isomorphic topics in algebra and physics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 153–166.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blanchette, I., & Dunbar, K. 2000. How analogies are generated: The roles of structural and superficial similarity. Memory and Cognition, 28, 108–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blasko, D. G., & Connine, C. M. 1993. Effects of familiarity and aptness on metaphor processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19, 295–308.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D. 2005. The career of metaphor. Psychological Review, 112(1), 193–216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Christie, S., Gentner, D., Call, J., & Haun, D. B. M. 2016. Sensitivity to relational similarity and object similarity in apes and children. Current Biology, 26(4), 531–535. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Falkenhainer, B., Forbus, K. D., & Gentner, D. 1989. The structure-mapping engine: Algorithm and examples. Artificial intelligence, 41(1), 1–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. 1994. Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. 1998. Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22(2), 133–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gentner, D. 1983. Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155–170. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gentner, D., Anggoro, F. K., & Klibanoff, R. S. 2011. Structure-mapping and relational language support children’s learning of relational categories. Child Development, 82, 1173–1188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gentner, D., & Bowdle, B. F. 2001. Convention, form, and figurative language processing. Metaphor and Symbol, 16, 223–247. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gentner, D., & Kurtz, K. 2001. Learning and using relational categories. In W. K. Ahn, R. L. Goldstone, B. C. Love, A. B. Markman, & P. W. Wolff (Eds.), Categorization inside and outside the laboratory (pp. 151–175). Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. 1995. Similarity is like analogy: Structural alignment in comparison. In C. Cacciari (Ed.), Similarity in language, thought and perception (pp. 111–147). Brussels: BREPOLS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1997. Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 52(1), 45–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gernsbacher, M. A. 1989. Mechanisms that improve referential access. Cognition, 32, 99–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1997. Group differences in suppression skill. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 4, 175–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gernsbacher, M. A., Keysar, B., & Robertson, R. R. W. 2001. The role of suppression and enhancement in understanding metaphors. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 433–450. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B. 1990. Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review, 97, 3–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glucksberg, S. 2006. Can Florida become like the next Florida? When metaphorical comparisons fail. Psychological Science, 17, 935–938. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldwater, M. B., Bainbridge, R., & Murphy, G. L. 2016. Learning of role-governed and thematic categories. Acta Psychologica, 164, 112–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldwater, M. B., & Gentner, D. 2015. On the acquisition of abstract knowledge: Structural alignment and explication in learning causal system categories. Cognition, 137, 137–153. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldwater, M. B., & Markman, A. B. 2011. Categorizing entities by common role. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 406–413. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldwater, M. B., Markman, A. B., & Stilwell, C. H. 2011. The empirical case for role-governed categories. Cognition, 118, 359–376. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halford, G. S., Wilson, W. H., & Phillips, S. 2010. Relational knowledge: The foundation of higher cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(11), 497–505. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haun, D., & Call, J. 2009. Great apes’ capacities to recognize relational similarity. Cognition, 110, 147–159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holyoak, K. J. 2005. Analogy. In K. J. Holyoak, & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 117–142). Cambridge: The Cambridge University Publishing House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holyoak, K. J., Gentner, D., & Kokinov, B. 2001. Introduction: The place of analogy in cognition. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 1–19). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, M. 1987. The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Loewenstein, J., & Gentner, D. 2005. Relational language and the development of relational mapping. Cognitive Psychology, 50(4), 315–353. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malgady, R. G., & Johnson, M. G. 1976. Modifiers in metaphors: Effects of constituent phrase similarity on the interpretation of figurative sentences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 5, 43–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mareschal, L. D., & Richard, P. C. 2008. Analogy as relational priming: A developmental and computational perspective on the origins of a complex cognitive skill. Behavior and Brain Sciences, 31, 357–414. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. 1993. Images and models, similes and metaphors. In A. Ortony (Eds.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 357–400). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neely, J. H. 1991. Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner, & G. W Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading (pp. 99–123). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortony, A. 1979. Beyond literal similarity. Psychological Review, 86, 161–180. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortony, A. 1993. Metaphor: A multidimensional problem. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd edition) (pp. 1–16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. 1977. The rule of metaphor: The creation of meaning in language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rottman, B. M., Gentner, D., & Goldwater, M. B. 2012. Causal systems categories: Differences in novice and expert categorization of causal phenomena. Cognitive Science, 36(5), 919–932. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, J. 1979. Metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (1st edition) (pp. 92–123). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shu, D. 2000. A study of metaphor. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. Cognitive linguistics. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stern, J. 2000. Metaphor in context. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sweetser, E. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, J. 1995. Linguistic categorization. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomlinson, M. T., & Love, B. C. 2010. When learning to classify by relations is easier than by features. Thinking & Reasoning, 16, 372–401. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tversky, A. 1977. Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327–352. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolff, P., & Gentner, D. 2000. Evidence for role-neutral initial processing of metaphors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 529–541.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue