In:The Semantics of Dynamic Space in French: Descriptive, experimental and formal studies on motion expression
Edited by Michel Aurnague and Dejan Stosic
[Human Cognitive Processing 66] 2019
► pp. 289–319
Structure of French expression of motion
Gesture-speech relation, between-language comparison and developmental perspective
Published online: 29 July 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.66.08fib
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.66.08fib
Abstract
This chapter contributes to the present discussion about the expression of motion in French by presenting a psycholinguistic study that focuses on how information about motion is structured not only in speech but also in co-speech gesture. Interested in developmental and cross-linguistic perspectives, we included adults as well as 5- and 10-year-old children and compared French with a typologically different and less commonly studied language – Czech. Using data from narrations of short video clips featuring various motion events, we found that, in French, gestural expression of motion is organized more similarly to verbal expression of motion than in Czech. We also observed an age-related increasing tendency to include more information about motion into fewer clauses and gestural strokes.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Gesture-speech relation
- 2.1Gesture, language, and speech
- 2.2Gesturing, speaking, and thinking
- 2.3Impact of language and age
- 3.Verbal and gestural expression of motion
- 3.1Speaking about motion in different languages
- 3.2Interest of gesture in motion research
- 3.3Gesturing about motion in different languages
- 3.4Gesturing about motion in children
- 4.The present study
- 4.1Content and structure of expression of motion in French and Czech
- 4.2Design and hypotheses
- 4.3Participants, procedure, and materials
- 4.4Coding
- 4.4.1Coding of speech
- 4.4.2Coding of gesture
- 4.4.3Coding of gesture-speech relation
- 4.5Results
- 4.5.1Results for speech
- 4.5.2Results for gesture
- 4.5.3Results for gesture-speech relation
- 5.Discussion
- 5.1Discussion of speech results
- 5.1.1Impact of language type
- 5.1.2Impact of age
- 5.2Discussion of gesture results
- 5.2.1Impact of language type
- 5.2.2Impact of age
- 5.3Discussion of gesture-speech results
- 5.3.1Impact of language type
- 5.3.2Impact of age
- 5.1Discussion of speech results
- 6.Conclusion
Acknowledgments Notes References
References (46)
Alibali, M. W., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1993). Gesture–speech mismatch and mechanisms of learning: What the hands reveal about a child’s state of mind. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 468–523.
Allen, S., Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Brown, A., Furman, R., Ishizuka, T., & Fujii, M. (2007). Language-specific and universal influences in children’s packaging of manner and path: A comparison of English, Japanese, and Turkish. Cognition, 102, 16–48.
Argyle, M. (1972). Non-verbal communication in human social interaction. In R. Hinde (Ed.). Nonverbal communication (pp. 243–269). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Aurnague, M. (2011). How motion verbs are spatial: The spatial foundations of intransitive motion verbs in French. Lingvisticae Investigationes, 34(1), 1–34.
Bruner, J. S., Olver, R. R., & Greenfield, P. M. (1966). Studies in cognitive growth. New York: Wiley and Sons.
Capirci, O., Contaldo, A., Caselli, M. C, & Volterra, V. (2005). From action to language through gesture: A longitudinal perspective. Gesture, 5(1–2), 155–177.
Choi, S., & Bowerman, M. (1991). Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition, 41, 83–121.
Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R., (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 240–247.
Condon, W. C., & Ogston, R. (1967). A segmentation of behavior. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 5, 221–235.
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). The Repertoire of nonverbal behavior categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica, 1, 49–98.
Fibigerova, K. (2012). The impact of language on development of verbal and gestural expression of motion: Comparison between different-aged Czech and French. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Toulouse: Université Toulouse 2.
Fibigerova, K., & Guidetti, M. (2018). The impact of language on gesture in descriptions of voluntary motion in French and Czech adults and children. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 9(1), 99–134.
Fibigerova, K., Guidetti, M., & Šulová, L. (2012). Verbal and gestural expression of motion in French and Czech. In L. Filipović & K. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), Space and time across languages and cultures II.: Language, culture and cognition (pp. 251–268). Amsterdam &Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Guidetti, M., Fibigerova, K., & Colletta, J. M. (2014). Gestures and multimodal development: Some key issues for child language acquisition. In M. Seyfeddinipur & M. Gullberg (Eds.), From gesture in conversation to visible utterance in action (pp. 351–370). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Gullberg, M., Hendrix, H., & Hickmann, M. (2008). Learning to talk and gesture about motion in French. First Language, 28(2), 200–236.
Hijazo-Gascón, A., & Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2013). Same family, different paths: Intratypological differences in three Romance languages. In J. Goschler & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Variation and change in the encoding of motion events (pp. 39–54). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Hickmann, M. (2006). The relativity of motion in first language acquisition. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (pp. 281–308). Amsterdam & Philadephia: John Benjamins.
Hickmann, M., Hendriks, H., & Gullberg, M. (2011). Developmental perspectives on the expression of motion in speech and gesture: A comparison of French and English. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 2(1). 129–156.
Hrstková, K. (2007). Czech prefixed verbs in a valency lexicon. In J. Šafránková & J. Pavlů (Eds.), WDS’07 Proceedings of Contributed Papers, Part I: Mathematics and Computer Sciences (pp. 131–137). Prague: Matfyzpress.
Kita, S. (2000.) How representational gestures help speaking. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and Gesture (pp. 162–185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kita, S., & Özyürek, A. (2003). What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal: Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 16–32.
Kopecka, A. (2006). The semantic structure of motion verbs in French: Typological perspectives. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (pp. 83–101). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Kunene Nicolas, R., Guidetti, M., & Colletta, J. M. (2016). A cross-linguistic study of the development of gesture and speech in Zulu and French oral narratives. Journal of Child Language, 4, 1–27.
Latkowska, J. (2011). On the representations of motion events: Perspectives from L2 research. In M. Pawlak & J. Bielak (Eds.), New perspectives in language, discourse and translation studies (pp. 91–102). Berlin: Springer.
Levinson, S. C., & Wilkins, D. (Eds.). (2006). Grammars of space: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
McNeill, D., & Duncan, S. (2000). Growth points in thinking-for-speaking. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 141–161). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nespoulous, J. L., & Lecours, A. R. (1986). Gestures: Nature and function. In J. L. Nespoulous, P. Perron, & A. R. Lecours (Eds.), The biological foundations of gestures: Motor and semiotic aspects (pp. 49–62). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Allen, S., Brown, A., Furman, R., & Ishizuka, T. (2008). Development of cross-linguistic variation in speech and gesture: Motion events in English and Turkish. Developmental Psychology, 44(4), 1040–1054.
Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Allen, S., Furman, R., & Brown, A. (2005). How does linguistic framing of events influence co-speech gestures?: Insights from cross-linguistic variations and similarities. Gesture, 5, 215–237.
Papafragou, A., Massey, C., & Gleitman, L. (2002). Shake, rattle, ‘n’ roll: The representation of motion in language and cognition. Cognition, 84, 189–219.
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1966). La psychologie de l’enfant. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Rescher, N. (1989). Cognitive Economy: The economic dimension of the theory of knowledge. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch, & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Slobin, D. I. (2000). Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. In S. Niemeier, & R. Dirven (Eds.), Evidence for linguistic relativity (pp. 107–138). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
(2004). The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Stromqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 219–257). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
(2006). What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (pp. 59–81). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
