Cover not available

In:Perspectives on Abstract Concepts: Cognition, language and communication
Edited by Marianna Bolognesi and Gerard J. Steen
[Human Cognitive Processing 65] 2019
► pp. 241–261

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 11
Abstract concepts in development

Spontaneous production of complex words in Swedish child language

Published online: 6 June 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.65.12ros
Abstract
For young children, grasping abstract concepts and words poses a challenge. This chapter reports a case-study in which I discuss the abstract concepts expressed by complex words (440 types) by a Swedish girl (1–3 years). The data show that complex adjectives expressing evaluative content emerged prior age 2. These types of adjectives might thus be one step towards the learning of abstract concepts. The child’s novel compounds, combining concepts on several variables, are proof of her ability to gradually abstract away from perception-based reality. They can therefore be another means in the process of building abstract representation. In conclusion, this study confirms a view of abstract representation being built up gradually by relying on multiple factors such as linguistic, experiential, and contextual information.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The grounding of abstract concepts
    • 2.1Abstract and internal state words in language development
    • 2.2Embodied conceptual combination in language development
    • 2.3Word-formation in language development
  • 3.Diary data
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1Abstract complex words reflecting affective and sensorimotor information
    • 4.2Novel complex words and their relation to perception-based reality
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgment
  • Notes
  • References
References (43)
References
Altarriba, J., Bauer, L. M., & Benvenuto, C. 1999. Concreteness, context availability, and imageability ratings and word associations for abstract, concrete, and emotion words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 31, 578–602. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. 2016. On staying grounded and avoiding quixotic dead ends. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 23, 1122–1142. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W., Simmons, W. K., Barbey, A. K., & Wilson, C. D. 2003. Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(2), 84–91. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W., & Wiemer-Hastings, K. 2005. Situating abstract concepts. In D. Pecher, and R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking (129–163). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Becker, J. A. 1994. “Sneak-shoes”, “sworders”, and “nose-beards”: A case study of lexical innovation. First Language 14(41), 195–211. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bergelson, E., & Swingley, D. 2013. The acquisition of abstract words by young infants. Cognition 127, 391–397. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berman, R. A. 2009. Children’s acquisition of compound constructions. In R. Lieber, and P. Štekauer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding (298–322). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bloom, P. 2000. How children learn the meanings of words. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolognesi, M., & Steen, G. 2018. Abstract Concepts: Structure, Processing and Modeling. Editors’ introduction. Topics in Cognitive Science 10(3), 490–500.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booth, A. E., & Waxman, S. 2009. A horse of a different color: Specifying with precision infants’ mappings of novel nouns and adjectives. Child Development 80(1), 15–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borghi, A. M., Capirci, O., Gianfreda, G., & Volterra, V. 2014. The body and the fading away of abstract concepts and words: A sign language analysis. Frontiers in Psychology 5:811. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Braisby, N., Dockrell, J., & Best, R. 2001. Children’s acquisition of science terms: Does fast mapping work? In M. Almgren, A. Barreña, M.-J. Ezeizabarrena, I. Idiazabal, and B. MacWhinney (Eds.), Research on child language acquisition. Proceedings of the 8th Conference of the International Association for the Study of Child Language (1066–1087). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bretherton, I., & Beeghly, M. 1982. Talking about internal states: The acquisition of an explicit theory of mind. Developmental Psychology 18(6), 906–921. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caramelli, N., Setti, A., & Maurizzi, D. D. 2004. Concrete and abstract concepts in school age children. Psychology of Language and Communication 8(2), 19–34.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. 2016. First language acquisition. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Connell, L., & Lynott, D. 2011. Interpretation and representation: Testing the Embodied Conceptual Combination (ECCo) Theory. In B. Kokinov, A. Karmiloff-Smith, and N. J. Nerssessian (Eds.), European perspectives on cognitive science. Proceedings of the European conference on cognitive science (paper 144). Sophia: New Bulgarian University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dressler, W. U., & Barbaresi, L. M. 1994. Morphopragmatics: Diminutives and intensifiers in Italian, German, and other languages. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dressler, W. U., Kilani-Schoch, M., & Klampfer, S. 2003. How does a child detect morphology? Evidence from production. In R. H. Baayen, and R. Schreuder (Eds.), Morphological structure in language processing (391–425). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dressler, W. U., Lettner, L. E., & Korecky-Kröll, K. 2010. First language acquisition of compounds: With special emphasis on early German child language. In S. Scalise, and I. Vogel (Eds.), Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding (323–344). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elbers, L. 2000. An output-as-input hypothesis in language acquisition. In P. Broeder, and J. Murre (Eds.. Models of language acquisition: Inductive and deductive approaches (244–271). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elsen, H., & Schlipphak, K. 2015. Word-formation in first language acquisition. In P. O. Müller, I. Ohnheiser, S. Olsen, and F. Rainer (Eds.), Word-formation: An international handbook of the languages of Europe, Vol. 3 (2117–2137). Berlin and Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gentner, D., & Boroditsky, L. 2001. Individuation, relativity and early word learning. In M. Bowerman, and S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Language, culture, and cognition Vol. 3: Language acquisition and conceptual development (215–256). New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gottfried, G. 1997. Using metaphors as modifiers: Children’s production of metaphoric compounds. Journal of Child Language 24, 567–601. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jamrozik, A., McQuire, M., Cardillo, E. R., & Chatterjee, A. 2016. Metaphor: Bridging embodiment to abstraction. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 23(4), 1080–1089. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kousta, S. T., Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Andrews, M., & Del Campo, E. 2011. The representation of abstract words: Why emotion matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 140(1), 14–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krott, A. 2009. The role of analogy for compound words. In J. Blevins, and J. Blevins (Eds.), Analogy in Grammar: Form and Acquisition (118–136). Oxford: U. Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krott, A., Gagné, C. L., & Nicoladis, E. 2010. Children’s preference for HAS and LOCATED relations: A word learning bias for noun–noun compounds. Journal of Child Language 37, 373–394. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landau, B., Smith, L. B., & Jones, S. S. 1988. The importance of shape in early lexical learning. Cognitive Development 3, 299–321. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lynott, D., & Connell, L. 2010. Embodied conceptual combination. Frontiers in Psychology 1:212. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maguire, M. J., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. 2006. A unified theory of word learning: Putting verb acquisition in context. In K. Hirsh-Pasek, and R. M. Golinkoff (Eds.), Action meets word: How children learn verbs (364–391). New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mellenius, I. 1997. The acquisition of nominal compounding in Swedish. Doctoral dissertation. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mellenius, I. 2003. Word Formation. In G. Josefsson, C. Platzack, and G. Håkansson (Eds.), The Acquisition of Swedish Grammar (75–95). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nicoladis, E. 2007. Preschool children’s acquisition of compounds. In G. Libben, and G. Jarema (Eds.), The representation and processing of compound words (96–124). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paivio, A. 1986. Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwanenflugel, P. J. 1991. Why are abstract concepts hard to understand? In P. J. Schwanenflugel (Ed.), The psychology of word meanings (223–250). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Shoben, E. J. 1983. Differential context effects in the comprehension of abstract and concrete verbal materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 9(1), 82–102.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomkins, S. S. 1984. Affect theory. In K. Scherer, and P. Ekman (Eds.), Approaches to emotion (353–400). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tribushinina, E., Voeikova, M., & Noccetti, S. 2015. Adjective acquisition across languages. In E. Tribushinina, M. Voeikova, and S. Noccetti (Eds.), Semantics and morphology of early adjectives in first language acquisition (1–22). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vigliocco. G., Kousta, S. T., Della Rosa, P. A., Vinson, D. P., Tettamanti, M., Devlin, J. T., & Cappa, S. F. 2013. The neural representation of abstract words: The role of emotion. Cerebral Cortex 24(7), 1767–1777. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wauters, L., Tellings, A., Van Bon, W., & Van Haaften, A. 2003. Mode of acquisition of word meanings: The viability of a theoretical construct. Applied Psycholinguistics 24(3), 385–406. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wellman, H. M., Harris, P. L., Banerjee, M., & Sinclair, A. 1995. Early understanding of emotion: Evidence from natural language. Cognition and Emotion 9(2/3), 117–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiemer-Hastings, K., Krug, J., & Xu, X. 2001. Imagery, context availability, contextual constraints and abstractness. In J. D. Moore, and K. Stenning (Eds.), Proceedings of 23rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (1106–1111). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A. 2016. Situation models, mental simulations, and abstract concepts in discourse comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 23(4), 1028–1034. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue