Cover not available

In:Perspectives on Abstract Concepts: Cognition, language and communication
Edited by Marianna Bolognesi and Gerard J. Steen
[Human Cognitive Processing 65] 2019
► pp. 215–238

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 10
Metaphor in action

Action verbs and abstract meaning

Published online: 6 June 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.65.11pan
Abstract
Embodiment plays an essential role in both concrete and abstract semantic representation. As a consequence, action verbs are extensively involved in the conceptualization and linguistic encoding of figurative meanings. In the light of several theoretical frameworks, this chapter aims to investigate the mechanisms that enable verbs to acquire new abstract meanings. The analysis we present focuses specifically on the metaphorical variation of a cohesive group of five Italian action verbs codifying a movement along the vertical axis (alzare, abbassare, salire, scendere, sollevare). The results confirm the Invariance Principle worked out by Lakoff: the metaphorical mapping of an action verb is strictly constrained by the image schemas involved in its core and concrete meaning.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.IMAGACT: Ontology of actions
    • 2.1General verbs and their semantic representation in IMAGACT
    • 2.2Marked variation and starting data
  • 3.Metaphors: Theoretical frameworks
    • 3.1Conceptual metaphor theory
    • 3.2Image schema theory
  • 4.Abstraction processes along the vertical axis: Three case studies
    • 4.1Centrality of the vertical axis
    • 4.2Common orientational metaphors
    • 4.3The case of sollevare: Image schema constraints
    • 4.4Fictive vs. factive motion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgment
  • Notes
  • References
References (51)
References
Aziz-Zadeh, L., & Damasio, A. 2008. Embodied semantics for actions: Findings from functional brain imaging. Journal of Physiology-Paris 102 (1), 35–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. 2008. Grounded cognition. Annual Review Psychology 59, 617–645. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2016. Can cognition be reduced to action? Processes that mediate stimuli and responses make human action possible. In A. K. Engel, K. J. Friston and D. Kragic, (Eds.), The Pragmatic Turn: Toward Action-Oriented Views in Cognitive Science. Series: Strüngmann forum reports, 18. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, S. W. 2014. From visual prototype of action to metaphors extending the IMAGACT ontology of action to secondary meanings (ISO-10). In H. Bunt (Ed.), Proceedings 10th Joint ISO – ACL SIGSEM, Workshop on Interoperable Semantic Annotation, Reykjavik, Iceland, 26 May 2014 (53–56).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brugman, C. 1988. The Story of over. Polysemy, Semantics and the Structure of the Lexicon. New York: Garland [originally : M.A. thesis at the University of California, Berkeley, 1981].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cienki, A. 1997. Some properties and groupings of image schemas. In M. Verspoor, K. Lee, and E. Sweetser (Eds.), Lexical and syntactical constructions and the construction of meaning: proceedings of the bi-annual ICLA meeting in Albuquerque July 1995 (3–15). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1998. STRAIGHT: An image schema and its metaphorical extensions. Cognitive Linguistics 9 (2), 107–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clausner, T. C., & Croft, W. 1999. Domains and image schemas, Cognitive Linguistics, 10, 1, 1–31.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Desai, R. H., Binder, J. R., Conant, L. L., Mano, Q. R., & Seidenberg, M. S. 2011. The neural career of sensory-motor metaphors. Journal of cognitive neuroscience 23 (9), 2376–2386. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ekberg, L. 1995. The mental manipulation of the vertical axis: How to go from “up” to “out” or from “above” to “behind”. In M. Verspoor, K. Dong, and E. Sweetser (Eds.), Lexical and syntactical constructions and the construction of meaning: proceedings of the bi-annual ICLA meeting in Albuquerque July 1995 (69–88). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feldman, J., & Narayanan, S. 2004. Embodied meaning in a neural theory of language. Brain and Language 89, 385–392. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. 2005. The Brain’s concepts: the role of the Sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology 22 (3/4), 455–479. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., & Colston, H. L. 1995. The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations. Cognitive Linguistics 6, 347–378. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. 2006. Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hampe, B. 2005. When down is not bad, and up not good enough: A usage-based assessment of the plus–minus parameter in image-schema theory. Cognitive Linguistics 16 (1), 81–112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hampe, B., & Grady, J. 2005. From Perception to Meaning Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics.Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, M. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiefer, M., & Pulvermüller, F. 2011. Conceptual representations in mind and brain: theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions. Cortex 48 (7), 805–825. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kopecka, A., & Narasimhan, B. (Eds.), 2012. Events of Putting and Taking. A Crosslinguistic Perspective. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. 2000. Metaphor and Emotion. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015. Where Metaphors Come from: Reconsidering Context in Metaphor. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krzeszowski, T. P. 1993. The axiological parameter in preconceptual image schemata. In R. A. Geiger, and B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Eds.), Conceptualizations and Mental Processing in Language (307–329). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1997. Angels and devils in hell: Elements of axiology in semantics. Warsaw: Wydawn.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1990. The Invariance Hypothesis: is abstract reason based on image-schemas? Cognitive Linguistics 1 (1), 39–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (203–249). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., Swenson, J., & Schwartz, A. 1991. Master Metaphor List (2nd ed.). Technical report, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors we Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. 1986. Abstract motion. Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, (455–471). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Majid, A., & Bowerman, M. (Eds.), 2007. Cutting and breaking events: A crosslinguistic perspective [Special Issue]. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mandler, J. M. 1992. How to build a baby: ii. Conceptual primitives. Psychological Review 99, 597–604. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mandler, J. M., & Canovas, C. P. 2014. On defining image schemas. Language and Cognition 6, 510–532. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matlock, T. 2004. The conceptual motivation of fictive motion. In G. Radden and K. Panther (Eds.), Studies in Linguistic Motivation (221–248). New York/Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Y. 1996. Subjective motion and English and Japanese verbs. Cognitive Linguistics 7, 183–226. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moneglia, M. 1998. Teoria empirica del senso e partizione semantica del lessico. Studi di grammatica italiana 17, 363–398.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. Natural language ontology of action, a gap with huge consequences for natural language understanding and machine translation. In: Z. Vetulani and J. Mariani (Eds.), Human Language Technology Challenges for Computer Science and Linguistics (379–395). Berlin and New York: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moneglia, M., Monachini, M., Calabrese, O., Panunzi, A., Frontini, F., Gagliardi, G., & Russo, I. 2012. The IMAGACT Cross-linguistic Ontology of Action. A new infrastructure for natural language disambiguation. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, T. Declerck, M. Uğur Doğan, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, J. Odijk, & S. Piperidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eight International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (948–955). Paris: European Language Resources Association (ELRA).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moneglia, M. 2014. The Semantic variation of action verbs in multilingual spontaneous speech corpora. In T. Raso and H. Mello (Eds.), Spoken Corpora and Linguistics Studies (152–190). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oakley, T. 2010. Image schemas. In D. Geeraerts, and H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (214–235). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panunzi, A., & Moneglia, M. 2004. La Variazione Primaria del verbo nel lessico dei corpora di parlato. In F. Albano Leoni, F. Cutugno, M. Pettorino and R. Savy (Eds.), Atti del Convegno Il Parlato Italiano, volume CD-ROM, C4 (1–24). Napoli: D’Aura Edizioni.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panunzi, A., De Felice, I., Gregori, L., Jacoviello, S., Monachini, M., Moneglia, M., & Quochi, V. 2014. Translating action verbs using a dictionary of images: the IMAGACT ontology. In A. Abel, C. Vettori, and N. Ralli (Eds.), Proceedings of the XVI EURALEX International Congress: The user in focus (1163–1170). Bolzano: EURAC research.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pulvermüller, F. 2005. Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6, 576–582. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quinn, N. 1991. The cultural basis of metaphor. In J. W. Fernandez (Ed.), Beyond Tropes: The Theory of Tropes in Anthropology (56–93). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rohrer, T. 2006. Image Schemata in the Brain. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics (165–196), Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. 1983. How language structures space. In H. L. Pick and L. P. Acredolo (Eds.), Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research, and Application, (225–282). New York/London: Plenum Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1996. Fictive motion in language and ‘ception’. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel and M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and Space, (211–276). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turner, M. 1991. Reading minds: The study of English in the age of cognitive science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vernillo, P. 2015. La variazione marcata di verbi di azione generali ad alta frequenza. MA diss, University of Florence.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1953. Philosophische Untersuchungen. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Wang, Huili, Shurong Zhang, Xueyan Li & Beixian Gu
2024. The Embodied Effect in the Comprehension of Chinese Action-Verb Metaphors. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 53:4 DOI logo
Cai, Tianyuan, Ho Hung Lim, John S. Y. Lee & Meichun Liu
2022. 2022 International Conference on Asian Language Processing (IALP), ► pp. 413 ff. DOI logo
Vernillo, Paola
2021. Grounding Abstract Concepts in Action. In Concepts in Action [Language, Cognition, and Mind, 9], ► pp. 167 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue