Cover not available

In:Perspectives on Abstract Concepts: Cognition, language and communication
Edited by Marianna Bolognesi and Gerard J. Steen
[Human Cognitive Processing 65] 2019
► pp. 59–74

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 3
Inferential processing with concrete vs. abstract words and visual cortex

Published online: 6 June 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.65.04cal
Abstract
In this chapter, I discuss the neuroscientific evidence concerning the role of the visual cortex for inferential semantic processing of concrete vs. abstract words. Results of my review suggest that visual cortex activity not only systematically accompanies inferential processing of concrete words, but it is also an active (facilitating) component of it. This is consistent with the Simulation or Embodied accounts of lexical semantic competence, according to which language understanding in general just consists in imagery/simulation processes underpinned by dedicated areas of the brain (e.g., the visual cortex). However, I show that this is not the case for words referring to abstract concepts: inferential processing of abstract words does not seem to involve visual cortex. The theoretical consequences of this phenomenon are also discussed.
Article outline
  • 1.Lexical inferential competence and visual-related cortex
  • 2.Evidence from neuroimaging studies
  • 3.Evidence from patient studies
  • 4.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgment
  • Notes
  • References
References (59)
References
Barsalou, L. W. 1999. Perceptual symbol systems. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22(4), 577–609.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 59, 617–645. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bartolomeo, P. 2002. The relationship between visual perception and visual mental imagery: a reappraisal of the neuropsychological evidence. Cortex 38(3), 357–378. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. The neural correlates of visual mental imagery: an ongoing debate. Cortex 44(2), 107–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bedny, M., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. 2006. Neuroanatomically separable effects of imageability and grammatical class during single-word comprehension. Brain and Language 98(2), 127–139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Behrmann, M., Moscovitch, M., & Winocur, G. 1994. Intact visual imagery and impaired visual perception in a patient with visual agnosia. Journal of Experimental Psychology 20(5), 1068–1087.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Binder, J. R. 2007. Effects of word imageability on semantic access: neuroimaging studies. In John Hart, Michael A. Kraut (Eds.), Neural Basis of Semantic Memory (149–170). Cambridge: University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Binder, J. R., & Desai, R. H. 2011. The neurobiology of semantic memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15(11), 527–536. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., & Conant, L. L. 2009. Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex 19(12), 2767–2796. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolognesi, M., & Steen, G. 2018. Abstract Concepts: Structure, Processing and Modeling. Editors’ introduction. Topics in Cognitive Science 10(3), 490–500.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borghi, A. M., Binkofski, F., Castelfranchi, C., Cimatti, F., Scorolli, C., & Tummolini, L. 2017. The challenge of abstract concepts. Psychological Bulletin 143(3), 263–292. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Calzavarini, F. 2017. Inferential and referential lexical semantic competence: A critical review of the supporting evidence. Journal of Neurolinguistics 44, 163–189. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Campbell, R., & Manning, L. 1996. Optic aphasia: a case with spared action naming and associated disorders. Brain and Language 53(2), 183–221. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carlesimo, G. A., Casadio, P., Sabbadini, M., & Caltagirone, C. 1998. Associative visual agnosia resulting from a disconnection between intact visual memory and semantic systems. Cortex 34(4), 563–576. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
D’Esposito, M., Detre, J. A., Aguirre, G. K., Stallcup, M., Alsop, D. C., Tippet, L. J., & Farah, M. J. 1997. A functional MRI study of mental image generation. Neuropsychologia 35(5), 725–730. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dove, G. 2009. Beyond perceptual symbols: A call for representational pluralism. Cognition 110(3), 412–431. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, V. & Green, M. 2006. Cognitive linguistics: an introduction. Edinburgh: University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fery, P., & Morais, J. 2003. A Case Study of Visual Agnosia without Perceptual Processing or Structural Descriptions Impairment. Cognitive Neuropsychology 20(7), 595–618. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forde, E. M. E., Francis, D., Riddoch, M. J., Rumiati, R. I., & Humphreys, G. W. 1997. On the Links between Visual Knowledge and Naming: A Single Case Study of a Patient with a Category-specific Impairment for Living Things. Cognitive Neuropsychology 14(3), 403–458. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. 2005. The Brain’s concepts: the role of the Sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology 22(3), 455–479. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldenberg, G., & Artner, C. 1991. Visual imagery and knowledge about the visual appearance of objects in patients with posterior cerebral artery lesions. Brain and Cognition 15(2), 160–186. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodglass, H., Hyde, M. R., & Blumstein, S. 1969. Frequency, picturability and availability of nouns in aphasia. Cortex 5(2), 104–119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffman, P. 2016. The meaning of “life” and other abstract words: Insights from neuropsychology. Journal of Neuropsychology 10(2), 317–343. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffman, P., Binney, R. J., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. 2015. Differing contributions of inferior prefrontal and anterior temporal cortex to concrete and abstract conceptual knowledge. Cortex 63, 250–266. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffman, P., Jefferies, E., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. 2010. Ventrolateral prefrontal cortex plays an executive regulation role in comprehension of abstract words: convergent neuropsychological and repetitive TMS evidence. The Journal of Neuroscience 30(46), 15450–15456. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffman, P., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. 2011. Reverse concreteness effects are not a typical feature of semantic dementia: evidence for the hub-and-spoke model of conceptual representation. Cerebral Cortex 21(9), 2103–2112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holcomb, P. J., Kounios, J., Anderson, J. E., & West, W. C. 1999. Dual-coding, context-availability, and concreteness effects in sentence comprehension: an electrophysiological investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 25(3), 721–742.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Humphreys, G. W., Riddoch, M. J., & Price, C. J. 1997. Top-down processes in object identification: evidence from experimental psychology, neuropsychology and functional anatomy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 352(1358), 1275–1282. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Katz, R. B., & Goodglass, H. 1990. Deep dysphasia: analysis of a rare form of repetition disorder. Brain and Language 39(1), 153–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kemmerer, D. 2010. How Words Capture Visual Experience: The Perspective from cognitive neuroscience. In B. Malt and P. Wolff (Eds.), Words and the mind: How words capture human experience (287–327). Oxford: University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiefer, M., & Pulvermüller, F. 2012. Conceptual representations in mind and brain: theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions. Cortex 48(7), 805–825. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kounios, J., & Holcomb, P. J. 1994. Concreteness effects in semantic processing: ERP evidence supporting dual-coding theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology 20(4), 804–823.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kravitz, D. J., Saleem, K. S., Baker, C. I., Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. 2013. The ventral visual pathway: an expanded neural framework for the processing of object quality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17(1), 26–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1990. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambon Ralph, M. A. 2014. Neurocognitive insights on conceptual knowledge and its breakdown. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 369(1634). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landauer, T. K. 1997. A Solution to Plato’s Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. Psychological Review 104(2), 211–240. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mahon, B. Z. 2015. What is embodied about cognition? Language , Cognition and Neuroscience 30(4), 420–429. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. 2008. A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology 102(1–3), 59–70.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manning, L. 2000. Loss of visual imagery and defective recognition of parts of wholes in optic aphasia. Neurocase 6(2), 111–128. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marconi, D., Manenti, R., Catricalà, E., Della Rosa, P. A., Siri, S., & Cappa, S. F. 2013. The neural substrates of inferential and referential semantic processing. Cortex 49(8), 2055–2066. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marconi, D. 1997. Lexical Competence. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, A. 2007. The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annual Review of Psychology 58, 25–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNorgan, C. 2012. A meta-analytic review of multisensory imagery identifies the neural correlates of modality-specific and modality-general imagery. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6, 285. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mellet, E., Tzourio, N., Denis, M., & Mazoyer, B. 1998. Cortical anatomy of mental imagery of concrete nouns based on their dictionary definition. Neuroreport 9(5), 803–808. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mestres-Missé, A., Münte, T. F., & Rodriguez-Fornells, A. 2009. Functional neuroanatomy of contextual acquisition of concrete and abstract words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 21(11), 2154–2171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meteyard, L., Cuadrado, S. R., Bahrami, B., & Vigliocco, G. 2012. Coming of age: A review of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics. Cortex 48(7), 788–804. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nittono, H., Suehiro, M., & Hori, T. 2002. Word imageability and N400 in an incidental memory paradigm. International Journal of Psychophysiology 44(3), 219–229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prinz, J. 2002. Furnishing the Mind: Concepts and Their Perceptual Basis. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pulvermüller, F. 2012. Meaning and the brain: The neurosemantics of referential, interactive, and combinatorial knowledge. Journal of Neurolinguistics 25(5), 423–459. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. How neurons make meaning: brain mechanisms for embodied and abstract-symbolic semantics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17(9), 458–470. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Riddoch, M. J., & Humphreys, G. W. 1987. Visual object processing in optic aphasia: A case of semantic access agnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 4(2), 131–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sabsevitz, D. S., Medler, D. A., Seidenberg, M., & Binder, J. R. 2005. Modulation of the semantic system by word imageability. NeuroImage 27(1), 188–200. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shallice, T., & Cooper, R. P. 2013. Is there a semantic system for abstract words? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7, 175.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shallice, T., & Cooper, R. 2015. The Organisation of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simmons, W. K., & Barsalou, L. W. 2003. The similarity-in-topography principle: reconciling theories of conceptual deficits. Cognitive Neuropsychology 20(3), 451–486. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vandenbulcke, M., Peeters, R., Fannes, K., & Vandenberghe, R. 2006. Knowledge of visual attributes in the right hemisphere. Nature Neuroscience 9(7), 964–970. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, J., Conder, J. A., Blitzer, D. N., & Shinkareva, S. V. 2010. Neural representation of abstract and concrete concepts: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Human Brain Mapping 31(10), 1459–1468. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whatmough, C., Verret, L., Fung, D., & Chertkow, H. 2004. Common and contrasting areas of activation for abstract and concrete concepts: an H2 15O PET study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16(7), 1211–1226. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wise, R. J., Howard, D., Mummery, C. J., Fletcher, P., Leff, A., Büchel, C., & Scott, S. K. 2000. Noun imageability and the temporal lobes. Neuropsychologia 38(7), 985–994. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue