In:Language Learning, Discourse and Cognition: Studies in the tradition of Andrea Tyler
Edited by Lucy Pickering and Vyvyan Evans
[Human Cognitive Processing 64] 2018
► pp. 63–82
Chapter 3Senior confessions
Narratives of self-disclosure
Published online: 20 December 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.64.04box
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.64.04box
Abstract
This study is an ethnographic analysis of narratives of self-disclosure in the context of recurring happy hour events among “the new old” – people in their sixties who are recently retired or who are about to do so. The storytellers herein share recollections that divulge past transgressions, disclosing identities that are sometimes conflicting. In so doing, they reveal identities of foolishness at a younger age that they claim to have “remedied” through maturation. Revealing personal information is, in general, perceived as a risky business. For the conversations observed here, these groups form a ‘temporary’ bond that seeks common ground and accepts a ‘temporary’ understanding of what this personal information means and how it is to be evaluated.
Keywords: discourse analysis, narrative, relational identity
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Method and data
- 3.Literature review
- 4.The study
- 4.1Out of “wedlock”
- 4.2The “good old days”
- 4.3Neglectful parenting
- 4.4All work and no play
- 4.5Skirting the law
- 5.Discussion
- 5.1Humor
- 5.2Gender differences
- 6.Conclusion
References
References (35)
Altman, I., & Taylor, D. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Archer, R. L., & Earle, W. (1983). The interpersonal orientations of disclosure. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Basic group processes (pp. 289–314). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Boxer, D., & Cortés-Conde, F. (1997). From bonding to biting: Conversational joking and identity display. Journal of Pragmatics 27, 275–294.
Boxer, D. & Matsumoto, Y. (2015). Funny in hindsight: Gender, age and humor in self-disclosure stories across cultures, Paper presented at IPrA, 2015, Antwerp, Belgium.
Bucholtz, M., Liang, A., & Sutton, L. (Eds.). (1999). Bad examples: Transgression and progress in language and gender studies. Reinventing identities: The gendered self in discourse (pp. 3–24). New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chelune, G. (1987). A neuropsychological perspective of interpersonal communication. In V. J. Delega & J. H. Berg (Eds.), Self-disclosure: Theory, research, and therapy (pp. 9–34). New York: Plenum.
Cortés-Conde, F. & Boxer, D. (2010). Humorous self-disclosures as resistance to socially imposed gender roles. Gender and Language, 4(1), 73–97.
De Francisco, V. (1991). The sounds of silence: How men silence women in marital relations. Discourse & Society, 4, 413–24.
Derlega, V. J., & Grzelak, J. (1979). Appropriateness of self-disclosure. In G. J. Chelune (Ed.). Self-Disclosure: Origins, patterns and implications of openness in interpersonal relationships (pp. 1–9). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Dindia, K., & Allen, M. (1992). Sex differences in self-disclosure: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 106–124.
Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (1992). Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, 461–490
Ervin-Tripp, S. (2001). The place of gender in developmental pragmatics: Cultural factors. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 34(1), 131–147.
Ervin-Tripp, S., & Lampert, M. (1992). Gender differences in the construction of humorous talk. In K. Hall, M. Bucholtz, and B. Moonwoman (Eds.), Locating power (pp. 10–117). Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group.
Ervin-Tripp, S., Lampert, M., Escalera, E., and Reyes, I. (2004). ‘It was a hecka funny:’ Some features of children’s conversational development. Texas Linguistic Forum, 48, 1–16.
Herring, S., Johnson, D., & DiBenedetto, T. (1992). Participation in electronic discourse in a ‘Feminist Field’. In K. Hall, M. Bucholtz, and B. Moonwoman (Eds.), Locating power (pp. 250–262). Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group.
Jefferson, G. (1984). On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles. In J. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 346–369). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Keltner, D. & Capps, L. (2001). Just teasing: A conceptual analysis and empirical review Psychological Bulletin
, 127(2), 229–248.
Lampert, M. & Ervin-Tripp, S. (2006). Risky laughter: Teasing and self-directed joking among male and female friends Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 51–72.
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Matsumoto, Y. (2011). Painful to playful: Quotidian frames in the conversational discourse of older Japanese women Language in Society, 40, 591–616.
(2009). Dealing with life changes: Humour in painful self-disclosures by elderly Japanese women. Ageing & Society, 29, 929–952.
Norrick, N. (2009). The construction of multiple identities in elderly narrators’ stories. Ageing & Society, 29, 903–927.
Schnurr, S. & Holmes, J. (2007). Humour and masculinity at work. Paper presented at the International Pragmatics Association conference, Goteborg, Sweden.
Spack, R. (1988). Initiating ESL students into the academic discourse community: How far should we go? TESOL Quarterly (21: 1).
Takanashi, H. (2007). Framing self-directed humor by Japanese women. Paper presented at the International Pragmatics Association conference, Goteborg, Sweden.