Cover not available

In:Evidence for Evidentiality
Edited by Ad Foolen, Helen de Hoop and Gijs Mulder
[Human Cognitive Processing 61] 2018
► pp. 121–141

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 5
Finnish evidential adverbs in argumentative texts

 | University of Helsinki
Published online: 19 July 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.61.06jaa
The analysis concerns three meaning types that denote the interlocutors’ epistemic access and epistemic authority to knowledge: expectedness, shared access, and individual access. The different accesses lead to different interactional and textual functions of evidential adverbs. The most relevant features concern the rhetoric patterns (concession, contrast, adding, etc.) connected with argumentation and the type of knowledge occurring in the scope of an adverb (generic – specific, conventionalized – non-conventionalized, irrefutable – negotiable). The study focuses on Finnish adverbs derived from the verb tietää ‘know’, and their usage in reader comments in newspaper online sites.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Modes of knowing derived from tietää ‘know’
  • 3.Epistemic and evidential adverbs in use
  • 4.The data
  • 5.Analysis
    • 5.1Expectation and shared knowledge
    • 5.2‘As far as is known’ type of shared access
    • 5.3Individual knowledge
  • 6.Discussion of the results and conclusion
    • 6.1Access and the type of the state of affairs
    • 6.2Dialogic framing and the rhetoric structure
    • 6.3Epistemic and evidential scales
      • Data
  • Notes
  • References
References (25)
References
Aikhenvald, A. Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aijmer, K. 2009. Seem and evidentiality. Functions of Language, 16, 63–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, W. 1986. Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In W. Chafe, & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality. The linguistic coding of epistemology (261–272). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, V., & Green, M. 2006. Cognitive linguistics. An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hakulinen, A., Vilkuna, M., Korhonen, R., Koivisto, V., Heinonen, T. R., & Alho, I. 2004. Iso suomen kielioppi. [Descriptive grammar of contemporary Finnish.] Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, J. 2012. Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45, 1–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaakola, M. 2011. Epäspesifi evidentiaali. Nykysuomen tiettävästi . [The non-specific evidential: the word tiettävästi ‘as far as is known’ in contemporary Finnish.] Virittäjä, 115, 515–541.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2012. Displaying knowledge in journalistic texts: a contrastive analysis of an evidential particle in Estonian and Finnish. Close Comparisons, 22, 43–70.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Juvonen, R. 2010. Evaluoiva että-yhdyslause ja retoriset rakenteet suomenkielisessä ylioppilasaineessa. [Evaluative että ‘that’ clause constructions and rhetorical structures in Finnish matriculation essays] Virittäjä, 114, 39–70.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011. Tietämisen tasot. Tiedän-rakenteet ylioppilasaineissa. [Levels of knowing. ‘I know’ constructions in the Finnish language matriculation exams.] In A. Kauppinen, H. Lehti-Eklund, H. Makkonen-Craig, & R. Juvonen (Eds.), Lukiolaisten äidinkieli: suomen- ja ruotsinkielisten lukioiden opiskelijoiden tekstimaisemat ja kirjoitustaitojen arviointi (239–264). Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiparsky, C., & Kiparsky, P. 1971. Fact. In D. D. Steinberg, & L. A. Jakobovits (Eds.), Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology (345–369). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar I. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. 2005. The language of evaluation. Appraisal in English. London & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. 1971. The new rhetoric. A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame (IN): University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rahtu, T. 2011. Irony and (in)coherence: interpreting irony using reader responses to texts. Text and Talk, 31, 335–354. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, A -M., & Aijmer, K. 2003. The expectation marker ‘of course’. Languages in Contrast, 4, 13–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007. The semantic field of modal certainty. A corpus-based study of English adverbs. [Topics in English linguistics 56]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, A -M., White, P. R. R., & Aijmer, K. 2007. Presupposition and ‘taking-for-granted’ in mass communicated political argument. In A. Fetzer, & G. Lauerbach (Eds.), Political discourse in the media: cross-cultural perspectives (31–74). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, T. 2011. Morality and question design: “of course” as contesting a presupposition of askability. In T. Stivers, L. Mondada, & J. Steensig (Eds.), The morality of knowing in conversation (82–106). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, T., Mondada, L., Steensig, J. 2011. Knowledge, morality and affiliation in Social Interaction. In T. Stivers, L. Mondada, & J. Steensig (Eds.), The morality of knowing in conversation (3–24). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verhagen, A. 2005. Constructions of intersubjectivity. Discourse, syntax, and cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Välttilä, V. 2014. Tietää-verbin merkitys. Semanttinen analyysi sanomalehtiaineiston pohjalta. [Semantic analysis of tietää ‘know’ in newspaper genre.] MA thesis, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Kittilä, Seppo
2024. Inference versus assumption in light of the Finnish evidential-modal adverbs näköjään and varmaan . Folia Linguistica 58:1 ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
Jaakola, Minna
2021. Marking one’s own viewpoint: The Finnish evidential verb+kseni‘as far as I understand’ construction. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 44:3 ► pp. 255 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue