Cover not available

In:Evidence for Evidentiality
Edited by Ad Foolen, Helen de Hoop and Gijs Mulder
[Human Cognitive Processing 61] 2018
► pp. 19–43

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 1
Evidentiality as stance

Event types and speaker roles

 | Stockholm University
Published online: 19 July 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.61.02ber
This chapter argues for a view of evidentials as a type of shifter and outlines a theory of reference for evidentials that separates the configuration of the ground from the relational axis, and the alignment between ground and figure. The chapter also evaluates a proposal by Kockelman (2004) that draws on Jakobson’s notion of “event type” and Goffman’s “speaker roles” to suggest an existing analogy between “commitment events” for modals and “source events” for evidentials. The scope properties of ‘factual’ forms in both systems notably constitute a formal difference between (epistemic) modality and evidentiality that cannot be accounted for solely by the referential properties of evidentials.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.A relational theory of indexical reference
    • 2.1Referential properties of evidentials
    • 2.2Referential alignment in evidentials
    • 2.3An illustration: epistemic marking in Ika
  • 3.Modality as stance: commitment events and the role of ‘principal’
    • 3.1Event-types and speaker-roles
    • 3.2Adding commitment: Paul Kockelman’s proposal
  • 4.Evidentiality as stance: source events and the role of ‘perceiver’
    • 4.1Evidential event-types and speaker-roles
    • 4.2Scope properties of evidentials and modals
    • 4.3Embedded source events
  • 5.Summary
  • Abbreviations
  • Notes
  • References
References (49)
References
Aikhenvald, A. Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anderson, S. R., & Keenan, E. L. 1985. Deixis. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic fieldwork vol. 3 (259–308). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, A., & Dixon, R. M. W. (Eds.) 2003. Studies in evidentiality. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(Eds.) 2013. The grammar of knowledge: a cross-linguistic typology [Explorations in Linguistic Typology 7]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bendix, E. H. 1992. The grammaticalization of responsibility and evidence: Interactional potential of evidential categories in Newari. In J. H. Hill & J. T. Irvine (Eds.), Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse (226–247). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bergqvist, H. 2012. Epistemic marking in Ika (Arwako). Studies in Language, 36(1), 154–181. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2017. The role of sentence type in Ika (Arwako) egophoric marking. In S. Floyd, E. Norcliffe, & L. San Roque (Eds.), Egophoricity. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bickel, B., & Nichols J. 2007. Inflectional Morphology. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description: vol. 3 grammatical categories and the lexicon (169–240). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boye, K. 2012. Epistemic meaning: A crosslinguistic and functional cognitive study. [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 43]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1985. Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Creissels, D. 2008. Person variation in Akhvakh verb morphology: functional motivation and origin of an uncommon pattern. STUF, 61(4), 309–325.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2009. Language documentation and verb inflection typology: the case of Northern Akhvakh (Nakh-Daghestanian). Handout at Chronos 9, October 2–4, Paris.
Curnow, T. J. 2002. Types of interaction between evidentials and first person subjects. Anthropological Linguistics, 44(2), 178–196.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diessel, H. 1999. Demonstratives: Form, function, and grammaticalization. [Typological Studies in Language 42]. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 1986. Self-Evidence and Ritual Speech. Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, Ed. by Wallace L. Chafe and Johanna Nichols, 313–336. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eberhard, D. 2009. Mamaindê grammar: A northern Nambikwara language and its cultural context. 2 volumes. Utrecht: LOT Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Floyd, S., Norcliffe, N., & San Roque, L. (Eds.) 2017. Egophoricity. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Faller, M. 2002. Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hanks, W. F. 1990. Referential practice: Language and lived space among the Maya. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2009. Fieldwork on deixis. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(1), 10–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2012. Evidentiality in social interaction. Pragmatics and Society, 3(2), 169–180. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hale, A. 1980. Person markers: Finite conjunct and disjunct forms in Newari. In Trail R. (Ed.), Papers in Southeast Asian Linguistics 7 (95–106). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hargreaves, D. 2005. Agency and intentional action in Kathmandu Newar. Himalayan Linguistics, 5, 1–48.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hengeveld, K., & Dall’Aglio Hattnher, M. M. 2015. “Four types of evidentiality in the native languages of Brazil. Linguistics, 53(3), 479–524. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Himmelmann, N. P. 1996. Demonstratives in narrative discourse: A taxonomy of universal uses. In B. Fox (Ed.), Studies in anaphora (205–254). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobsen, W. H. 1986. The heterogeneity of evidentials in Makah. In W. Chafe, & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic encoding of epistemology (3–28). Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. 1957. Shifters and verbal categories. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Dept. of Slavic Languages and Literatures. Reprinted in L. R. Waugh & M. Monville-Burston (Eds.), [1990] On language (386–392). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1922. Language; its nature, development, and origin, London: Geroge Allen & Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang. 1994. Time in language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kockelman, P. 2004. Stance and subjectivity. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 14, 127–150. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. Review of “Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives”. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 22(2), E105–E118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. Language, culture, and mind: Natural constructions and social kinds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landaburu, J. 1992. La langue ika ou Arhuaco: Morphosyntaxe du verbe. Amerindia, 17, 1–30.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2000. La lengua ika. In M. S. Gonzales de Peréz, & M. L. Rodrigues de Montes (Eds.), Lenguas indígenas de Colombia: Una visión descriptíva (733–748). Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Loughnane, R. 2010. A Grammar of Oksapmin. PhD thesis. University of Melbourne.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, J. 1977. Semantics vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mithun, M. 1999. The Languages of Native North America (Cambridge Language Surveys). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mushin, I. 2001. Evidentiality and epistemological stance: Narrative retelling, [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 87]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oswalt R. L. 1986. The evidential system of Kashaya. In W. Chafe, & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: the linguistic coding of epistemology (29–45). Norwood N.J.: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramirez, H. 1997. A fala Tukano dos Ye’pâ-Masa, vol. 1: Gramática. Manaus: Inspetoria Salesiana Missionária da Amazônia & Centro “Iauareté” de Documentação Etnográfica e Missionária.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H. 1947. Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: Macmillan & Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rule, W. M. 1977. A comparative study of the Foe, Huli, and Pole languages of Papua New Guinea, [Oceania Linguistic Monographs 20]. Sydney: University of Sydney.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
San Roque, L. 2008. An introduction to Duna grammar. Canberra: The Australian National University dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
San Roque, L., & Loughnane, R. 2012. Evidentiality in Highland New Guinea. Linguistic Typology 16, 111–167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. 2006. Historical aspects of modality. In W. Frawley, (Ed.), The Expression of Modality (107–139). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1991. A reference grammar of Southeastern Tepehuan. SIL publications in Linguistics 100. Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Cheshire, Jenny, David Hall & Zoë Adams
2025. Direct evidentiality in the grammar of English: must have in a London dialect. English Language and Linguistics ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Mélac, Eric
2024. The links between evidentiality, modality, and grammaticalization. Studies in Language 48:3 ► pp. 513 ff. DOI logo
Kiesling, Scott F.
2022. Stance and Stancetaking. Annual Review of Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 409 ff. DOI logo
Bergqvist, Henrik
2020. Swedish modal particles as markers of engagement: Evidence from distribution and frequency. Folia Linguistica 54:2 ► pp. 469 ff. DOI logo
Bergqvist, Henrik
2023. Seeing and knowing. Functions of Language 30:2 ► pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
Bergqvist, Henrik & Dominique Knuchel
2019. Explorations of Engagement: Introduction. Open Linguistics 5:1 ► pp. 650 ff. DOI logo
San Roque, Lila
2019. Evidentiality. Annual Review of Anthropology 48:1 ► pp. 353 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue