In:Motion and Space across Languages: Theory and applications
Edited by Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano
[Human Cognitive Processing 59] 2017
► pp. 39–60
Chapter 1The typology of manner expressions
A preliminary look
Published online: 14 August 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.59.03aki
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.59.03aki
Abstract
The morphosyntax of manner expressions has attracted less attention than that of path expressions in the framing typology. Drawing primarily on experimental and quantitative data in Japanese and English, we propose and examine three parameters in the complex typology of manner expressions. It is argued that coarse-grained, event-inherent manners that the speaker does not intend to stress (e.g. normal running) are more likely to be realized in tight morphosyntactic constructions headed by manner verbs than fine-grained, event-concomitant manners that the speaker intends to stress (e.g. an annoying and characteristic shout of a jogger). The proposed parameters appear to share an iconic, communicative motivation that links pragmatic prominence with morphosyntactic prominence.
Keywords: grain size, event inherence, expressiveness, ideophones, Japanese, English
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Previous studies
- 2.1Manner and manner expressions
- 2.2Manner and the framing typology
- 3.Grain size
- 4.Event inherence
- 5.Expressiveness
- 6.Discussion and conclusion
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (66)
Akita, K. 2009. A grammar of sound-symbolic words in Japanese: Theoretical approaches to iconic and lexical properties of mimetics. Ph.D. Dissertation, Kobe University.
2012. Toward a frame-semantic definition of sound-symbolic words: A collocational analysis of Japanese mimetics. Cognitive Linguistics, 23(1), 67–90.
2013. Expressiveness in mimetic syntax: Quantitative evidence from Japanese and English. Paper presented at the Grammar of Mimetics Workshop. SOAS, University of London, London, UK, 10 May 2013.
2015. Yootai-hyoogen no ruikeiron ni okeru yootai no tenkeisei [The typicality of manner in the typology of manner expressions]. In Y. Yumoto, & N. Ono (Eds.), Goi-imiron no arata nakanoosei o sagutte [Searching for new possibilities of lexical semantics] (354–380). Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
Akita, K., Matsumoto, Y., & Ohara, K. H. 2010. Idoo-hyoogen no ruikeiron ni okeru tyokuzi-teki-keiro-hyoogen to yootai-goi-repaatorii [Deictic path expressions and manner lexicon in the typology of motion expressions]. In T. Kageyama (Ed.), Lexicon forum, 5 (1–25). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
Akita, K., & Usuki, T. 2016. A constructional account of the “optionality” of quotative marking on Japanese mimetics. Journal of Linguistics, 52(2), 245–275. .
Allen, S., Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Brown, A., Furman, R., Ishizuka, T., & Fujii, M. 2007. Language-specific and universal influences in children’s syntactic packaging of Manner and Path: A comparison of English, Japanese, and Turkish. Cognition, 102, 16–48.
Beavers, J., Levin, B., & Tham, S. W. 2010. The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics, 46(2), 331–377.
Boas, H. C. 2008. Toward a frame-constructional approach to verb classification. In E. S. Acevedo, & F. J. C. Rodríguez (Eds.), Grammar, constructions, and interfaces: Special issue of Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 57, 17–48.
Cardini, F. E. 2008. Manner of motion saliency: An inquiry into Italian. Cognitive Linguistics, 19(4), 533–569.
Childs, G. T. 1994. African ideophones. In L. Hinton, J. Nichols, & J. J. Ohala (Eds.), Sound symbolism (178–204). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cifuentes-Férez, P. 2010. The semantics of the English and the Spanish motion verb lexicons. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 8(2), 233–271.
Croft, W., Barðdal, J., Hollmann, W., Sotirova, V., & Taoka, C. 2010. Revisiting Talmy’s typological classification of complex events. In H. Boas (Ed.), Contrastive construction grammar (201–235). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Diemer, S. 2011. Corpus linguistics with Google? Proceedings of the Second Conference of International Society for the Linguistics of English. [URL]
Dingemanse, M. 2011. The meaning and use of ideophones in Siwu. Ph.D. Dissertation, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics & Radboud University Nijmegen.
2017. Expressiveness and system integration: On the typology of ideophones, with special reference to Siwu. STUF – Language Typology and Universals, 70(2), 119–141.
Dingemanse, M., & Akita, K. 2016. An inverse relation between expressiveness and grammatical integration: On the morphosyntactic typology of ideophones, with special reference to Japanese. Journal of Linguistics, FirstView.
Enfield, N. J. 2002. Cultural logic and syntactic productivity: Associated posture constructions in Lao. In N. J. Enfield (Ed.), Ethnosyntax: Explorations in grammar and culture (231–258). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Güldemann, T. 2008. Quotative indexes in African languages: A synchronic and diachronic survey. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hinton, L., Nichols, J., & Ohala, J. J. (Eds.). 1994. Sound symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hirose, M. 1981. Japanese and English contrastive lexicology: The role of Japanese “mimetic” adverbs. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Hundt, M., Nesselhauf, N., & Biewer, C. (Eds.). 2007. Corpus linguistics and the Web Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Iwata, S. 2002. Does MANNER count or not?: Manner-of-motion verbs revisited. Linguistics, 40(1), 61–110.
2006. Where there’s a sound, there’s motion: Two types of path PPs that appear after verbs of sound emission. Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference of Construction Grammar. University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan, 3 September 2006.
Kakehi, H., Tamori, I., & Schourup, L. 1996. Dictionary of iconic expressions in Japanese. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kawachi, K. 2014. Patterns of expressing motion events in Kupsapiny. In O. Hieda (Ed.), Recent advances in Nilotic linguistics (103–136). Tokyo: Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
2001. Semantic schism and interpretive integration in Japanese sentences with a mimetic: A reply to Tsujimura. Linguistics, 39(2), 419–436.
Kloe, D. R. 1977. A dictionary of onomatopoeic sounds, tones and noises in English and Spanish including those of animals, man, nature, machinery and musical instruments, together with some that are not imitative or echoic. Detroit, MI: Blaine Ethridge.
Levin, B. 1993. English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2015. Verb classes within and across languages. In A. Malchukov, & B. Comrie (Eds.), Valency classes in the World's languages. Vol. 2: Case studies from New Guinea, Australia, and the Americas, and theoretical outlook (1627–1670). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levin, B., Song, G., & Atkins, B. T. S. 1997. Making sense of corpus data: A case study of verbs of sound. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 2(1), 23–64.
Malt, B. C., Ameel, E., Imai, M., Gennari, S. P., Saji, N., & Majid, A. 2014. Human locomotion in languages: Constraints on moving and meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 74, 107–123.
Matsumoto, Y. 2003. Typologies of lexicalization patterns and event integration: Clarifications and reformulations. In S. Chiba et al. (Eds.), Empirical and theoretical investigations into language: A Festschrift for Masaru Kajita (403–417). Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
2013. Determinants of Manner, Path, and Deixis saliency across languages. Paper presented at the International Workshop SYLEX III: Space and Motion across Languages and Applications. University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain, 21 November 2013.
Nasu, A. 2002. Nihongo-onomatope no gokeisei to inritu-koozoo [Word formation and prosodic structures of Japanese onomatopoeia]. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Tsukuba.
Nuckolls, J. B. 1996. Sounds like life: Sound-symbolic grammar, performance, and cognition in Pastaza Quechua. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ohara, K. H. 2002. Linguistic encodings of motion events in Japanese and English: A preliminary look. The Hiyoshi Review of English Studies, 41, 122–153.
Özçalışkan, Ş., & Slobin, D. I. 2003. Codability effects on the expression of manner of motion in Turkish and English. In A. S. Özsoy, D. Akar, M. Nakipoğlu-Demiralp, E. Erguvanlı-Taylan, & A. Aksu-Koç (Eds.), Studies in Turkish linguistics (259–270). Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Press.
Saito, T. 2011. An investigation of the linguistic encoding of motion and state-change events in English and Japanese through Talmy’s typology. Ph.D. Dissertation, Tohoku University.
Schaefer, R. P. 2001. Ideophonic adverbs and manner gaps in Emai. In F. K. E. Voeltz, & C. Kilian-Hatz (Eds.), Ideophones (339–354). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Schultze-Berndt, E. 2000. Simple and complex verbs in Jaminjung: A study of event categorisation in an Australian language. Wageningen: Ponsen & Looijen.
Slobin, D. I. 1997. Mind, code, and text. In J. Bybee, J. Haiman, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Essays on language function and language type: Dedicated to T. Givón (437–467). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2000. Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. In S. Niemeier, & R. Dirven (Eds.), Evidence for linguistic relativity (107–138). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2004. The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist, & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (219–257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2006. What makes manner of motion salient?: Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. In M. Hickmann, & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (59–81). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Snell-Hornby, M. 1983. Verb-descriptivity in German and English: A contrastive study in semantic fields. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.
Sugiyama, Y. 2005. Not all verb-framed languages are created equal: The case of Japanese. Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual Meeting of Berkeley Linguistics Society, 31, 299–310.
Talmy, L. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1991. Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of Berkeley Linguistics Society, 17, 480–519.
2000. Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol. II: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tamori, I., & Schourup, L. 1999. Onomatope: Keitai to imi [Onomatopoeia: Form and meaning]. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.
Tamura, Y. 2006. Characteristics of English sound-emission path construction: A prototype cross-linguistic account. In M. Yamanashi (Ed.), Studies in Cognitive Linguistics, 5 (209–242). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
Toratani, K. 2006. On the optionality of to-marking on reduplicated mimetics in Japanese. In T. J. Vance, & K. Jones (Eds.), Japanese/Korean linguistics, 14 (415–422). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
2012. The role of sound-symbolic forms in Motion event descriptions: The case of Japanese. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 10(1), 90–132.
2017. The position of to/∅-marked mimetics in Japanese sentence structure. In N. Iwasaki, P. Sells, & K. Akita (Eds.), The grammar of Japanese mimetics. Perspectives from structure, acquisition, and translation (35–72). London: Routledge.
Van Valin, R. D., Jr., & LaPolla, R. J. 1997. Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Voeltz, F. K. E., & Kilian-Hatz, C. (Eds.). 2001. Ideophones. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
WebCorp: The Web as Corpus. Research and Development Unit for English Studies, Birmingham City University. [URL]
Wienold, G. 1995. Lexical and conceptual structures in expressions for movement and space: With reference to Japanese, Korean, Thai, and Indonesian as compared to English and German. In U. Egli, P. E. Pause, C. Schwarze, A. Stechow, & G. Wienold (Eds.), Lexical knowledge in the organisation of language (301–340). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (11)
Cited by 11 other publications
Ferrara, Casey, Jenny C. Lu & Susan Goldin‐Meadow
Menete, Sérgio N. & Guiying Jiang
Ryzhova, Daria, Ekaterina Rakhilina, Tatiana Reznikova & Yulia Badryzlova
Smith, Viktor
Taremaa, Piia & Anetta Kopecka
Akita, Kimi
2020. Modality-specificity of iconicity. In Operationalizing Iconicity [Iconicity in Language and Literature, 17], ► pp. 3 ff.
Akita, Kimi & Yo Matsumoto
2020. A fine-grained analysis of manner salience. In Broader Perspectives on Motion Event Descriptions [Human Cognitive Processing, 69], ► pp. 143 ff.
Matsumoto, Yo & Kazuhiro Kawachi
2020. Motion event descriptions in broader perspective. In Broader Perspectives on Motion Event Descriptions [Human Cognitive Processing, 69], ► pp. 1 ff.
Høeg Müller, Henrik
Kudrnáčová, Naděžda
2019. Contrastive semantics of human locomotion verbs. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 17:1 ► pp. 53 ff.
Kudrnáčová, Naděžda
2021. Contrastive semantics of human locomotion verbs. In Corpus Approaches to Language, Thought and Communication [Benjamins Current Topics, 119], ► pp. 53 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
