In:Studies in Figurative Thought and Language
Edited by Angeliki Athanasiadou
[Human Cognitive Processing 56] 2017
► pp. 273–294
Chapter 11Pragmatic effects in blended figures
The case of metaphtonymy
Published online: 26 April 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.56.11col
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.56.11col
Abstract
Issues concerning pragmatic effects resulting from blends of figurative language forms are considered. Different resulting patterns in such blends are approached first through deconstruction of pragmatic effects in individual figures such as metaphor, synecdoche, broader metonymy, verbal irony and others. How blends of those figures can then afford cancellation, facilitation, combination and other outcomes for their corralled pragmatic effects is then demonstrated from previous research and consideration of blended figurative examples, most prominently blends of metaphor and metonymy, or metaphtonymy. A call for further research and delineation of some specific issues warranted by such an exploration is then offered.
Keywords: pragmatics, metaphor, metonymy, verbal irony, hyperbole, synecdoche, oxymora, figure blends, figurative language
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Figures in isolation
- 2.1Metaphor
- 2.1.1Association
- 2.1.2Sharing
- 2.1.3Blending
- 2.1.4Emergence
- 2.1.5Simulation
- 2.2Synecdoche
- 2.2.1Diminishment
- 2.2.2Iconic minimalism
- 2.2.3Attitude demonstration
- 2.3Verbal irony
- 2.3.1Pretense
- 2.3.2Echoic mention and reminder
- 2.3.3Graded salience
- 2.3.4Contrast
- 2.1Metaphor
- 3.Blended figures
- 3.1Metaphor with verbal irony
- 3.2Verbal irony with synecdoche (metonymy)
- 3.3Metaphor with synecdoche (metonymy)
- 4.Conclusion
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (28)
Baring, Z., Cushing, H., Gay-Rees, J. (Producers), & Banksy (Director). 2010. Exit through the gift shop [Motion picture]. United Kingdom: Paranoid Pictures.
Bergen, B. K. 2012. Louder than words: The new science of how the mind makes meaning. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Brone, G., Feyaerts, K., & Veale, T. (Eds.). 2016. Cognitive linguistics and humor research. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Carston, R., & Wearing, C. 2011. Metaphor, hyperbole and simile: A pragmatics approach. Language and Cognition, 3, 283–312.
Clark, H. H., & Gerrig, R. J. 2007. On the pretense theory of irony. In R. W. Gibbs, & H. L. Colston (Eds.), Irony in language and thought: A cognitive science reader (25–33). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Colston, H. L. 1997. “I’ve never seen anything like it”: Overstatement, understatement and irony. Metaphor and Symbol, 12(1), 43–58.
2007. What figurative language development reveals about the mind. In A. C. Schalley, & D. Khlentzos (Eds.), Mental states. Volume 2: Language and cognitive structure (191–212). Amsterdam & Philadelphia, John Benjamins.
Colston, H. L., & Gibbs, R. W. 2002. Are irony and metaphor understood differently? Metaphor and Symbol, 17(1), 57–80.
Colston, H. L., & Keller, S. B. 1998. You’ll never believe this: Irony and hyperbole in expressing surprise. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27(4), 499–513.
David, L., Seinfeld, J., Mandel, D. (Writers), & Ackerman, A. (Director). 1996. The Bizarro Jerry [Television series episode]. In A. Ackerman, T. Kaiser, & S. Mamann-Greenberg (Producers), Seinfeld. Los Angeles, CA: Castle Rock Entertainment.
David, L., Seinfeld, J., & Mandel, D. (Writers), & Ackerman, A. (Director). 1997. The Strike [Television series episode]. In A. Ackerman, T. Kaiser, & S. Mamann-Greenberg (Producers), Seinfeld. Los Angeles, CA: Castle Rock Entertainment.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. B. 2008. Rethinking metaphor. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (53–66). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, R. W. 1986. Comprehension and memory for nonliteral utterances: The problem of sarcastic indirect requests. Acta Psychologica, 62, 41–57.
Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. L. (Eds.). 2007. Irony in language and thought: A cognitive science reader. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Taylor & Francis Group.
Giora, R., & Gur, I. 2003. Irony in conversation: Salience, role, and context effects. In B. Nerlich, V. Herman, & D. D. Clarke (Eds.), Polysemy: Flexible patterns of meaning in mind and language (297–315). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Giora, R. 2003. On our mind: Salience, context and figurative language. New York: Oxford University Press.
2011. Will anticipating irony facilitate it immediately? In M. Dynel (Ed.), The pragmatics of humour across discourse domains (19–32). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Giora, R., Fein, O., Ganzi, J., Levi, N. A., & Sabah, H. 2005. On negation as mitigation: The case of negative irony. Discourse Processes, 39(1), 81–100.
Lorre, C., Prady, B., & Goetsch, D. (Writers), & Cendrowski, M. (Director). 2009. The Hofstadter Isotope [Television series episode]. In L. Aronsohn (Executive Producer), The Big Bang Theory. Burbank, CA: Warner Bros. Television.
Panther, K.-U., & Radden, G. (Eds.). 1999. Metonymy in language and thought. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L. L. (Eds.). 2003. Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Solska, A. 2012a. Relevance-theoretic comprehension procedure and processing multiple meanings in paradigmatic puns. In E. Walaszewska, & A. Piskorska (Eds.), Relevance theory: More than understanding (167–182). Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Colston, Herbert L.
2025. The big figurative picture. In What makes a Figure [Figurative Thought and Language, 19], ► pp. 14 ff.
Brdar, Mario & Rita Brdar-Szabó
2022. Figurative thought and language research in the 21st century. In Figurative Thought and Language in Action [Figurative Thought and Language, 16], ► pp. 1 ff.
Piskorska, Agnieszka
2020. Introduction. In Relevance Theory, Figuration and Continuity in Pragmatics [Figurative Thought and Language, 8], ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
