Cover not available

In:The Conversation Frame: Forms and functions of fictive interaction
Edited by Esther Pascual and Sergeiy Sandler
[Human Cognitive Processing 55] 2016
► pp. 215–234

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Intonation of fictive vs. actual direct speech in a Brazilian Portuguese corpus

 | Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Brazil
 | Federal University of São Carlos, Brazil
Published online: 1 November 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.55.11roc
We deal with prosodic features in constituents structured by the conversation frame, that is, involving fictive interaction (Pascual 2002, 2014). We investigate how prosodic aspects contribute to the recognition of a fictive reading as a non-genuine instance of direct speech in a Brazilian Portuguese spontaneous speech corpus. The construction in question is “(eu) falei + clause” (‘I said’ + clause), which can be interpreted either fictively or factively (Rocha 2006, 2013, 2014). We used PRAAT to analyze recorded examples of this construction. Our results show that instances with a factive reading have greater fundamental frequency (F0) mean, standard deviation, and range than fictive ones. Factive contours are shifted towards higher values by roughly 2 semitones compared to the fictive ones.
References (41)
References
Arantes, P. (2015). Time-normalization of fundamental frequency contours: A hands-on tutorial. In A.R. Meireles (Ed.), Courses on Speech Prosody (pp. 98–123). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Ávila, L.B.B. (2014). Modalidade em perspectiva: Estudo baseado em corpus oral do português brasileiro. PhD dissertation, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2015). MASS - Modal Annotation in Spontaneous Speech: semantic annotation scheme for modality in a spontaneous speech Brazilian Portuguese corpus. Veredas – Revista de Estudos Linguísticos, 19(2), 1–13.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2013). PRAAT: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 5.3.56, Retrieved 15 September 2013 from [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1999). Coherent voicing: On prosody in conversational reported speech. In W. Bublitz, U. Lenk, & E. Ventola (Eds.), Coherence is spoken and written discourse (pp. 11–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coutinho, P.R. do V. (2014). Tendências prosódicas de discurso reportado em fala espontânea. PhD dissertation. Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cresti, E. (2000). Corpus di italiano parlato. Firenze: Accademia della Crusca.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cresti, E., & Scarano, A. (1998). Sur la notion de parlé spontané. Available at: [URL]. Last access: 11 December 2014.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dias, C.C.N. (2008). A igreja como refúgio e a Bíblia como esconderijo: Religião e violência na prisão. São Paulo: Humanitas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. (1985). Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1997). Mappings in thought and language. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jansen, W., Gregory, M.L., & Brenier, J.M. (2001). Prosodic correlates of directly reported speech: Evidence from conversational speech. Proceedings of the ISCA workshop on prosody in speech recognition and understanding (pp. 77–80). Red Bank, NJ.
Langacker, R.W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luchjenbroers, J. (2001). Prosodic and gestural cues for navigations around mental space. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 27, 421–434. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myers, G. (1999). Unspoken speech: Hypothetical reported speech and the rhetoric of everyday talking. Text, 19(4), 571–590.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pascual, E. (2002). Imaginary trialogues: Conceptual blending and fictive interaction in criminal courts. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2006). Fictive interaction within the sentence: a communicative type of fictivity in grammar. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(2), 245–267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pascual, E., Królak, E., & Janssen, Th. A.J.M. (2013). Direct speech compounds: Evoking socio-cultural scenarios through fictive interaction. Cognitive Linguistics, 24(2), 345–366. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raso, T., & Mello, H.R. (2010). The C-ORAL-BRASIL corpus. In M. Moneglia & A. Panunzi (Eds.), Bootstrapping information from corpora in a crosslinguistic perspective (pp. 193–213). Florença: Firenzi University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2012). C-ORAL-BRASIL 1: Corpus de referência do português brasileiro falado informal. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reesink, G.P. (1993). ‘Inner speech’ in Papuan languages. Language and Linguistics in Melanesia, 24, 217–225.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rocha, L.F.M. (2003). Tendências prosódicas e interacionais do discurso reportado: uma abordagem sociocognitivista. Veredas – Revista de Estudos Linguísticos, 7(1/2), 247–262.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2004). A construção da mímesis no reality show: Uma abordagem sociocognitivista para o discurso reportado. PhD Dissertation. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2006). A fala silenciosa reportada: metáfora, metonímia e mesclagem. Linguística, 2(1), 23–38.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2012). Autocitação fictiva como escaneamento mental: Mover-se conceptualmente sem se deslocar. Revista da ABRALIN, 11(2), 113–143. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2013). A perspectivação conceptual em autocitação factiva e fictiva. DELTA [online]. 29(2), 311–339. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2014). Autocitação fictiva em português europeu e brasileiro. Alfa: Revista de linguística, 58(1), 63–92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (1986). Introducing constructed dialogue in Greek and American conversational and literary narratives. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), Direct and indirect speech (pp. 311–322). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1988). Hearing voices in conversation, fiction, and mixed genres. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Linguistics in context: Connecting observation and understanding (pp. 98–113). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1989). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1995). Waiting for the mouse: Constructed dialogue in conversation. In D. Tedlock & B. Mannheim (Eds.), The dialogic emergence of culture (pp. 198–217). Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traunmüller, H., & Eriksson, A. (1995a). The perceptual evaluation of F0-excursions in speech as evidenced in liveliness estimations. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 1905–1915. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1995b). The frequency range of the voice fundamental in the speech of male and female adults. Unpublished manuscript. [URL].
Vandelanotte, L. (2005). From representational to scopal ‘distancing indirect speech or thought’: A cline of subjectification. Text & Talk, 24(4), 547–585.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2009). Speech and thought representation in English: A cognitive-functional approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vries, L.J. de (1993). Forms and functions in Kombai, an Awyu language of Irian Jaya. Canberra: Australian National University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Pascual, Esther, Aline Dornelas & Todd Oakley
2017. When “Goal!” means ‘soccer’. Pragmatics & Cognition 24:3 ► pp. 315 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue