In:The Conversation Frame: Forms and functions of fictive interaction
Edited by Esther Pascual and Sergeiy Sandler
[Human Cognitive Processing 55] 2016
► pp. 113–130
Persuading and arguing with the reader
Fictive interaction as discourse organizing device in witchcraft pamphlet prefaces (1566–1621)
Published online: 1 November 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.55.06cha
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.55.06cha
Integrating Goffman’s concept of footing (1981), this chapter examines textually monologic – but conceptually dialogic – prefatory materials of Early Modern English witchcraft pamphlets (1566 to 1621) and explicates how pamphleteers consistently invoke and inhabit different speaking roles to set up fictive exchanges with imagined addressees. By alternating between speaking perspectives during such fictive interaction, the pamphleteer is able to persuade and argue with the here-and-now reader, thereby promoting the reception of the main text.
Keywords: authorial role, character role, footing, interlocutory role, speaking roles
References (33)
Bakhtin, M.M. (1981). Discourse in the novel. In M.M. Bakhtin (Ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M.M. Bakhtin (pp. 259–422). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Brown, P., & Levinson, R. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chaemsaithong, K. (2011). Discursive control and persuasion in Early Modern News Discourse: The case of English witchcraft pamphlets and their prefaces (1579–1621). English Text Construction, 4, 228–256.
. (2013). Interaction in early modern news discourse: The case of English witchcraft pamphlets and their prefaces (1566–1621). Text & Talk, 33, 167–188.
Claridge, C. (2010). News discourse. In A. Jucker & I. Taavitsainen (Eds.), Historical pragmatics (pp. 587–620). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Clark, S. (1983). The Elizabethan pamphleteers: Popular moralistic pamphlets 1580–1640. Rutherford: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
Cooren, F. (2010). Action and agency in dialogue: Passion, incarnation and ventriloquism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (2012). Communication theory at the center: Ventriloquism and the communicative constitution of reality. Journal of Communication, 62, 1–20.
Cooren, F., & Sandler, S. (2014). Polyphony, ventriloquism, and constitution: In dialogue with Bakhtin. Communication Theory, 24, 225–244.
Goodwin, C. (2007). Interactive footing. In E. Holt & R. Clift (Eds.), Reporting talk: Reporting speech interaction (pp. 16–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hymes, D. (1981). Breakthrough into performance. In D. Hymes (Ed.), “In vain I tried to tell you”: Essays in Native American ethnopoetics (pp. 79–141). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Koshik, I. (2005). Beyond rhetorical questions: Assertive questions in everyday interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Koven, M. (2002). An analysis of speaker role inhabitance in narratives of personal experience. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 167–217.
Levack, B. (2006). The witch-hunt in Early Modern Europe (3rd ed.). Harlow, England: Pearson Longman.
Pascual, E. (2002). Imaginary trialogues: Conceptual blending and fictive interaction in criminal courts. Utrecht: LOT
. (2006a). Fictive interaction within the sentence: A communicative type of fictivity in grammar. Cognitive Linguistics, 17, 245–267.
. (2006b). Questions in legal monologues: Fictive interaction as argumentative strategy in a murder trial. Text & Talk, 26, 383–402.
. (2014). Fictive interaction: The conversation frame in thought, language, and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Raymond, J. (2003). Pamphlets and pamphleteering in Early Modern Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tannen, D. (1986). Introducing constructed dialogue in Greek and American conversational and literary narratives. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), Direct and indirect speech (pp. 311–322). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. (1988). Hearing voices in conversation, fiction, and mixed genres. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Linguistics in context: Connecting observation and understanding (pp. 89–113). Norwoord NJ: Ablex.
. (1995). Waiting for the mouse: Constructed dialogue in conversation. In D. Tedlock & B. Mannheim (Eds.), The dialogic emergence of culture (pp. 198–217). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
. [1989] (2007). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue and imagery in conversational discourse (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Xiang, Mingjian & Esther Pascual
2022. Debate with zhuangzi. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 137 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
