In:Studies in Lexicogrammar: Theory and applications
Edited by Grzegorz Drożdż
[Human Cognitive Processing 54] 2016
► pp. 161–172
The conceptual structure of reflexivity in The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, Manuscript E
Published online: 4 August 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.54.08gor
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.54.08gor
The chapter views OE reflexive patterns with plain pronouns through the prism of the current cognitive linguistic research on Modern English reflexives in Kemmer (1993) and Talmy (2000). Under both approaches reflexivity is a conceptual relation, yet while Kemmer focuses on canonical reflexive situation types and the semantic roles of event participants, Talmy speaks of the actional content of a situation and personation, which, by and large, translate into the focus on the nature of the verb in the reflexive event. The analysis points out how the prototypical and less prototypical situation types in OE differ from their modern counterparts and lists Modern English cognates or equivalents of verbs that pattern with reflexives in The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle.
References (11)
Deane, P. 1992. Grammar in mind and brain: Explorations in cognitive science. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Keenan, E.L. 2002. Explaining the creation of reflexive pronouns in English. In D. Minkowa & R. Stockwell (Eds.), Studies in the history of the English language. A milennial perspective (325–351). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kemmer, S. 1993. The middle voice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
König, E., & Siemund, P. 2000. The development of complex reflexives and intensifiers in English. Diachronica, XVII(1), 39–84.
Reddy, M. 1979. The conduit metaphor. A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (284–324). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van Gelderen, E. 2000. A history of English reflexive pronouns. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
http://omacl.org/DOA03.11.2014http://asc.jebbo.co.uk/e/e-L.html DOA 03.11.2014
