Cover not available

In:Studies in Lexicogrammar: Theory and applications
Edited by Grzegorz Drożdż
[Human Cognitive Processing 54] 2016
► pp. 55–74

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Looking into introspection

Published online: 4 August 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.54.03dab
Introspective judgments are often used in linguistics to obtain information about speakers’ mental representations of language. This chapter addresses two questions, namely: what shapes speakers’ judgments, and what such judgments provide information about. I argue that speakers’ judgments are influenced by their theories of language, which in turn are partly shaped by our experience with written language. The fundamental units that linguists use in their analyses – phonemes, words, and sentences – are largely products of a particular written tradition; and grammaticality judgments about isolated sentences are, to a considerable extent, judgments about what is acceptable in written language. Thus, linguistic intuitions are not direct reflections of mental representations of linguistic knowledge, but of speakers’ sensitivity to socially constituted norms.
References (69)
Aarts, J. 1991. Intuition-based and observation-based grammars. In K. Aijmen & B. Altenberg (Eds.), English corpus linguistics: Studies in honour of Jan Svartvik (44–62). London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Adrián, J.A., Alegria, J., & Morais, J. 1995. Metaphonological abilities of Spanish illiterate adults. International Journal of Psychology, 30, 329–353. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allen, S. 2007. The future of Inuktitut in the face of majority languages: Bilingualism or language shift? Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 515–536. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bergen, B.K. 2012. Louder than words: The new science of how the mind makes meaning. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bürki, A., Spinelli, E., & Gareth, G.M. 2012. A written word is worth a thousand spoken words: The influence of spelling on spoken-word production. Journal of Memory and Language, 67, 449–467. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, W. 1985. Linguistic differences produced by differences between speaking and writing. In D.R. Olson, N. Torrance, & A. Hildyard (Eds.), Literacy, language and learning: The nature and consequences of reading and writing (105–123). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chipere, N. 2001. Native speaker variations in syntactic competence: Implications for first language teaching. Language Awareness, 10, 107–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Understanding complex sentences: Native speaker variations in syntactic competence. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cordaro, L., & Ison, J.R. 1963. Psychology of the scientist: X. Observer bias in classical conditioning of the planarian. Psychological Reports, 13, 787–789. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cordeiro, Patricia. 1988. Children’s punctuation: An analysis of errors in period placement. Research in the Teaching of English, 22, 62–74.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cowart, W. 1997. Experimental syntax: Applying objective methods to sentence judgments. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crystal, D. 1980. Neglected grammatical factors in conversational English. In S. Greenbaum, G. Leech, & J. Svartvik (Eds.), Studies in English linguistics (153–166). London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cumming, S. 1984. The sentence in Chinese. Studies in Language, 8, 365–395. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, E. 1997. The LAD goes to school: A cautionary tale for nativists. Linguistics, 35, 735–766. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. The effects of frequency and neighbourhood density on adult speakers’ productivity with Polish case inflections: An empirical test of usage-based approaches to morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 931–951. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Naive v. expert competence: An empirical study of speaker intuitions. The Linguistic Review, 27, 1–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, E., & Street, J. 2006. Individual differences in language attainment: Comprehension of passive sentences by native and non-native English speakers. Language Sciences, 28, 604–615. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ehri, L.C. 1985. Effects of printed language acquisition on speech. In D.R. Olson, N. Torrance, & A. Hildyard (Eds.), Literacy, language and learning: The nature and consequences of reading and writing (333–367). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ehri, L.C., Nunes, S.R., Willows, D.M., Valeska Schuster, B., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z., & Shanahan, T. 2001. Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 250–278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halford, B.K. 1990. The complexity of oral syntax. In B.K. Halford & H. Pilch (Eds.), Syntax gesprochener Sprachen (33–43). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. 1989. Spoken and written language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, R. 1981. The language myth. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffer, B.L. 1994. The last stages of the acquisition of syntax: The interaction of reading and syntactic development. In V.B. Makkai (Ed.), The twentieth LACUS forum 1993 (654–663). Chapel Hill, NC: Linguistic Association of Canada and the United States.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holden, M.H., & MacGinitie, W.H. 1972. Children’s conceptions of word boundaries in speech and print. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 551–557. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunt, K.W. 1977. Early blooming and late blooming syntactic structures. In C.L. Cooper & L. Odell (Eds.), Evaluating writing (91–104). Buffalo: State University of Buffalo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hussain, R. 1992. Psychological reality of the word in Chinese. Advances in Psychology, 90, 113–130.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakimik, J., Cole, R.A., & Rudnicky, A.I. 1985. Sound and spelling in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 165–178. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Juffermans, K., & Veldhuis, D. 2012. Comparing spelling and segmentation practices in three versions of a Mandinka text. In J. Blommaert, P. Varis, S. Lehtonen, & M. Spotti (Eds.), Papers in culture studies 34 (1–28). Tilburg: Tilburg University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karanth, P., Kudva, A., & Vijayan, A. 1995. Literacy and linguistic awareness. In B. de Gelder & J. Morais (Eds.), Speech and reading: A comparative approach (303–316). Hove Erlbaum (UK): Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A., Grant, J., Sims, K., Jones, M.-C., & Cuckle, P. 1996. Rethinking metalinguistic awareness: Representing and accessing knowledge about what counts as a word . Cognition, 58, 197–219. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, J.-H., Montrul, S., & Yoon, J. 2010. Dominant language influence in acquisition and attrition of binding: Interpretation of the Korean reflexive caki . Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 73–84. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kurvers, J., & Uri, H. 2006. Metalexical awareness: Development, methodology or written language? A cross-linguistic comparison. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 35(4), 353–367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kurvers, J., Vallen, T., & van Hout, R. 2006. Discovering features of language: Metalinguistic awareness of adult illiterates. In I. van de Craats, J. Kurvers, & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Low-educated second language and literacy acquisition: Proceedings of the inaugural symposium Tilburg 2005 (69–88). Utrecht: LOT.
Labov, W. 1975. What is a linguistic fact? Lisse: Peter de Ridder Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. When intuitions fail. In Papers from the parasession on theory and data in linguistics , Chicago Linguistic Society 32, 76–106.
Li, W. 2004. Topic chains in Chinese discourse. Discourse Processes, 37, 25–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Linell, P. 2005. The written language bias in linguistics: Its nature, origins and transformations. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, J., & Weinert, R. 1998. Spontaneous spoken language: Syntax and discourse. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morais, J., Alegria, J., & Content, A. 1986. Literacy training and speech segmentation. Cognition, 24, 45–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morais, J., Cary, L., Alegria, J., & Bertelson, P. 1979. Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phones arise spontaneously? Cognition, 7, 415–438. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myers, D.G. 2002. Intuition: Its powers and perils. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myers, J. 2009. Syntactic judgment experiments. Language & Linguistics Compass, 3, 406–423. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nagy, W.E., & Anderson, R.C. 1995. Metalinguistic awareness and literacy acquisition in different languages. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: Centre for the Study of Reading.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nippold, M.A. 1998. Later language development: The school-age and adolescent years. Austin, TX: Pro-ed.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nisbett, R.E., & Wilson, T.D. 1977. Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pattamadilok, C., Morais, J., Ventura, P., & Kolinsky, R. 2007. The locus of the orthographic consistency effect in auditory word recognition: Further evidence from French. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 700–726. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pawley, A., & Syder, F.H. 1983. Natural selection in syntax: Notes on adaptive variation and change in vernacular and literary grammar. Journal of Pragmatics, 7, 551–579. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perera, K. 1984. Children’s writing and reading. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1986. Language acquisition and writing. In P. Fletcher & M. Garman (Eds.), Language acquisition: Studies in first language development (494–618). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perfetti, C.A., & McCutchen, D. 1987. Schooled language competence: linguistic abilities in reading and writing. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics. Vol 2: Reading, writing, and language learning (105–141). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perre, L., Pattamadilok, C., Montant, M., & Ziegler, J.C. 2009. Orthographic effects in spoken language: On-line activation or phonological restructuring? Brain Research, 1275, 73–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartnik, J. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramachandra, V., & Karanth, P. 2007. The role of literacy in the conceptualization of words: Data from Kannada-speaking children and non-literate adults. Reading and Writing, 20, 173–199. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Read, C.A., Zhang, Y.-F., Nie, H.-Y., & Ding, B.-Q. 1986. The ability to manipulate speech sounds depends on knowing alphabetic writing. Cognition, 24, 31–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rong, L., & Hongjun, W. 2012. What are the basic units of Mandarin Chinese discourse? International Journal of Knowledge and Language Processing, 3, 1–17.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saenger, P. 2000. Space between words: The origins of silent reading. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scholes, R.J., & Willis, B.J. 1987. Literacy and language. Journal of Literary Semantics, 16(1), 3–11.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schütze, C.T. 1996. The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seidenberg, M.S., & Tanenhaus, M.K. 1979. Orthographic effect on rhyme monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 546–554. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shen, J., & Gu, Y. 1997. Conversation and sentence-hood. Text, 17, 477–489.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. 1991. Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Song, M., O’Grady, W., Cho, S., & Lee, M. 1997. The learning and teaching of Korean in community schools. In Y.-H. Kim (Ed.), Korean language in America 2 (111–127). Seattle: American Associations of Teachers of Korean.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Street, J., & Dąbrowska, E. 2010. More individual differences in language attainment: How much do adult native speakers of English know about passives and quantifiers? Lingua, 120, 2080–2094. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Lexically specific knowledge and individual differences in adult native speakers’ processing of the English passive. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35(01), 97–118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weinert, R. 2004. Relative clauses in spoken English and German – Their structure and function. Linguistische Berichte, 197, 3–51.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ziegler, J.C., Petrova, A., & Fernand, L. 2008. Feedback consistency effects in visual and auditory word recognition: Where do we stand after more than a decade? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 34, 643–661. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Gedik, Tan Arda
2025. How literacy acquisition changes L1 grammatical knowledge. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 13:1 ► pp. 193 ff. DOI logo
Winter, Bodo & Francesca Strik-Lievers
2023. Semantic distance predicts metaphoricity and creativity judgments in synesthetic metaphors. Metaphor and the Social World 13:1 ► pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Winter, Bodo & Marcus Perlman
2021. Iconicity ratings really do measure iconicity, and they open a new window onto the nature of language. Linguistics Vanguard 7:1 DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Sensory Linguistics [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 20], DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Conclusion. In Sensory Linguistics [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 20], ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue