Cover not available

In:Studies in Lexicogrammar: Theory and applications
Edited by Grzegorz Drożdż
[Human Cognitive Processing 54] 2016
► pp. 1–20

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Introduction

Theoretical, methodological, and practical problems in the study of lexicogrammar

Published online: 4 August 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.54.01dro
References (62)
Aronoff, M. 1993. Morphology by itself: Items and inflectional classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berg, T. 2014. Boundary permeability: A parameter for linguistic typology. Linguistic Typology, 18(3), 489–531. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booij, G. 2007. Construction morphology and the lexicon. In F. Montermini, G. Boyé, & N. Hathout (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 5th Décembrettes: Morphology in Toulouse (34–44). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Construction morphology. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(1), 1–13.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, L., & Traugott, E.C. 2005. Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Broccias, C. 2006. Cognitive approaches to grammar. In G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven, & F. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives (81–115). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J. 2001. Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In K. Hale & S.J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger (1–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, A. 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dirven, R., & Verspoor, M. 2004. Cognitive exploration of language and linguistics. 2nd Revised Edition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, V. 2007. A Glossary of Cognitive Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, C., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M.C. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of ‘let alone’. Language, 64(3), 501–538. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fries, C.C. 1952. The structure of English: An introduction to the construction of English sentences. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D. 2010. Theories of lexical semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D., & Cuyckens, H. (Eds.). 2007. The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. 2005. Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, T. 2001. Syntax: An introduction. Vol. II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A.E. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7(5), 219–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, B. 1997. Cognitive foundations of grammar. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffman, T., & Trousdale, G. (Eds.). 2013. The Oxford handbook of construction grammar. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hornstein, N., Nues, J., & Grohmann, K.K. 2005. Understanding Minimalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of language. Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, M. 1987. The Body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination and reason. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Katz, J., & Fodor, J. 1963. The structure of a semantic theory. Language, 39, 170–210. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kemmer, S. 1993. The middle voice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R.W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1990. Concept, image, symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Correspondences, compositionality, and grammar. MANUSYA: Journal of Humanities, 2(2), 61–76.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. A dynamic usage-based model. In M. Barlow & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-based models of language (1–63). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Constructional integration, grammaticization, and serial verb constructions. Language and Linguistics, 4(2), 251–278.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Construction grammars: Cognitive, radical, and less so. In F. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez & M.S. Peña Cervel (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction (101–159). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Investigations in cognitive grammar. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Conceptualization, symbolization, and grammar. International Journal of Cognitive Linguistics, 1(1), 31–64.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, J. 1992. Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mandler, J. 2010. The spatial foundations of the conceptual systems. Language and Cognition, 2, 21–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panther, K.-U. 2013. Motivation in language. In S. Kreitler (Ed.), Cognition and motivation: Forging an interdisciplinary perspective (407–432). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panther, K.-U., Thornburg, L., & Barcelona, A. (Eds.). 2009. Metonymy and metaphor in grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panther, K.-U., & Radden, G. 2011a. Introduction. Reflections on motivation revisited. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Motivation in grammar and the lexicon (1–26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (Eds.). 2011b. Motivation in grammar and the lexicon. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radden, G., & Panther, K.-U. (Eds.). 2004. Studies in linguistic motivation. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radford, A. 2004. English syntax: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F., & Diez, O. 2002. Patterns of conceptual interaction. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (489–532). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. 1976. Semantic causative types: The grammar of causative constructions. In M. Shibatani (Ed.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 6 (43–116). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1988. Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 12, 49–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, J.R. 1998. Syntactic constructions as prototype categories. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language (177–202). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. 2009. The usage-based theory of language acquisition. In E.L. Bavin (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of child language (69–87). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott Closs, E., & Dasher, R.B. 2002. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. 1982. Why can you have a drink when you can’t *have an eat? Language, 58, 753–799. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1987. Boys will be boys. Language, 63, 95–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zlatev, J. 2007. Spatial semantics. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (318–350). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zlatev, J., Blomberg, J., & Magnusson, U. 2012. Metaphor and subjective experience: A study of motion-emotion metaphors in English, Swedisch, Bulgarian, and Thai. In A. Foolen, U. Lüdtke, P. Timothy, P. Racine, & J. Zlatev (Eds.), Moving ourselves, moving others: Motion and emotion in intersubjectivity, consciousness and language (423–450). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zlatev, J., Blomberg, J., & David, C. 2010. Translocation, language and the categorization of experience. In V. Evans & P. Chilton (Eds.), Language, space and cognition (389–418). London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue