Cover not available

In:Conceptualizations of Time
Edited by Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk
[Human Cognitive Processing 52] 2016
► pp. 85–102

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Western Conception of Time in Signed Languages: a Cognitive Linguistic Perspective

Published online: 14 June 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.52.05kos
The chapter builds on previous research into the concept of time in signed languages (Brennan 1983; Wilcox 2000; Taub 2001; Sutton-Spence and Woll 2010). Relying on the framework of the second generation cognitive linguistics (Lakoff and Johnson 1999), it discusses the key elements of the Western view of time as expressed in American, British, Polish, and other signed languages. Signs based on metaphors, metonymies, and interactions of these two conceptual mechanisms represent the conception of time rooted in classical physics (Newton 1729), the paradigm of life sciences (McGrath and Kelly 1986), and the efficiency-oriented concept of work (Lakoff and Johnson 1980). They reflect time’s linearity and cyclicity, its division into homogenous units, and its use as an economic resource.
References (36)
References
Armstrong, D.F. 1999. Original Signs: Gesture, Sign, and the Sources of Language. Washington, DC: The Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brennan, M. 1983. Marking Time in BSL. In J.G. Kyle & B. Woll (eds.), Language in Sign: An International Perspective on Sign Language (pp. 10–31). London: Crook Helm.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duke, I. 2009. The Everything Sign Language Book: American Sign Language Made Easy. Avon, MA: Adams Media.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emmorey, K. 2002. Language, Cognition, and the Brain: Insights from Sign Language Research. Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
ESLC/European Sign Language Centre. Sign Language Dictionary. Available at: [URL] Accessed 12 May 2015.
Evans, V., & Green, M. 2006. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: The Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fass, D.C. 1997. Processing Metonymy and Metaphor. Greenwich, CT & London: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goossens, L. 1990. Metaphtonymy: The Interaction of Metaphor and Metonymy in Expressions for Linguistic Action. Cognitive Linguistics 1(3), 323–340. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grzymska, A. 2008. Kognitywne ujęcie metafor w PJM. In E. Twardowska (ed.), Stan badań nad Polskim Językiem Migowym (pp. 87–95). Łódź: Polski Związek Głuchych Oddział Łódzki.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guralnik, D.B. (ed.). 1986. Webster’s New World Dictionary of American Language. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, E.T. 1981. The Silent Language. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janda, L. 2007. From Cognitive Linguistics to Cultural Linguistics. Word and Sense: A Journal of Interdisciplinary Theory and Criticism in Czech Studies 8, 48–68.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koch, P. 1999. Frames and Contiguity: On the Cognitive Bases of Metonymy and Certain Types of Word Formation. In K.–U. Panther & G. Radden (eds.), Metonymy in Language and Thought (pp. 136–167). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kosecki, K. 2005. On the Part-Whole Configuration and Multiple Construals of Salience within a Simple Lexeme. Łódź: The Łódź University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kosiba, O., & Grenda, P. 2011. Leksykon języka migowego. Bogatynia, Poland: Silentium.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. 2005. Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: The Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lane, L. 1990. Gallaudet Survival Guide to Signing. Washington, DC: The Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R.W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: The Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGrath, J., & Kelly, J.R. 1986. Time and Human Interaction: Towards a Social Psychology of Time. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neugebauer, O. 1969. The Exact Science in Antiquity. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newton, I. 1729. The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. London: At Middle-Temple-Gate, Fleet Street.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
North, J. 2006. God’s Clockmaker: Richard of Wallingford and the Invention of Time. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Polański, K. (ed.). 1993. Encyklopedia językoznawstwa ogólnego. Wrocław: Ossolineum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radden, G. 2011. Spatial Time in the West and the East. In M. Brdar et al. (eds.), Space and Time in Language (pp. 1–40). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z. 1999. Towards a Theory of Metonymy. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (eds.), Metonymy in Language and Thought (pp. 17–59). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roudet, L. 1921. Sur la classification psychologique des changements sémantiques. Journal de psychologie normale et pathologique 18, 676–692.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, C. 2010. Sign Language Companion: A Handbook of British Signs. London: Souvenir Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sutton-Spence, R., & Woll, B. 2010. The Linguistics of British Sign Language: An Introduction. Cambridge: The Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taub, S.F. 2001. Language in the Body: Iconicity and Metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge: The Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, J.R. 1989. Linguistic Categorisation: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilcox, P.P. 2000. Metaphor in American Sign Language. Washington, DC: The Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilcox, S. 2008. Signed Languages. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 1113–1136). Oxford: The Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwart, P.J. 1976. About Time: A Philosophical Inquiry into the Origin and Nature of Time. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Kumcu, Alper
2025. It's High Time. In Exploration of the Intersection of Corpus Linguistics and Language Science, ► pp. 223 ff. DOI logo
Li, Heng
2022. Worrying about your future. Pragmatics & Cognition 29:1 ► pp. 160 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue