Cover not available

In:Conceptualizations of Time
Edited by Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk
[Human Cognitive Processing 52] 2016
► pp. 43–66

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Speaking, Gesturing, Reasoning

Methods and Issues in the Study of Spatial Construals of Time

Published online: 14 June 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.52.03wal
People use space to structure their thoughts about time (e.g. Núñez & Cooperrider 2013). In this chapter, we first provide a brief overview of the various ways that we use space to talk, gesture, and reason about deictic and sequence time. We then discuss the strengths and limitations of the different methodologies used to study space-time associations. We argue that some methods are especially useful for documenting the existence of spatial construals of time, while others are more useful for examining their flexibility. We illustrate this point by describing circumstances under which temporal reasoning diverges from patterns in both language and gesture.
References (56)
References
Bender, A., & Beller, S. 2014. Mapping Spatial Frames of Reference onto Time: a Review of Theoretical Accounts and Empirical Findings. Cognition 132, 342–382. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bergen, B.K., & Lau, T.T.C. 2012. Writing Direction Affects how People Map Space onto Time. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 109. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boroditsky, L. 2000. Metaphoric Structuring: Understanding Time through Spatial Metaphors. Cognition 75, 1–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boroditsky, L., & Gaby, A. 2010. Remembrances of Times East: Absolute Spatial Representations of Time in an Australian Aboriginal Community. Psychological Science 21, 1635–1639. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Calbris, G. 1990. The Semiotics of French Gestures. Bloomington, IA: IndianaUniversity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Casasanto, D., & Jasmin, K. 2012. The Hands of Time: Temporal Gestures in English Speakers. Cognitive Linguistics 23, 643–674. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Casasanto, D., & Bottini, R. 2010. Can Mirror-Reading Reverse the Flow of Time? In C. Hölscher, et al. (eds.), Spatial Cognition VII (pp. 335–345). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cienki, A. 1998. Metaphoric Gestures and some of their Relations to Verbal Metaphorical Expressions. In J.-P. Koenig (ed.), Discourse and Cognition: Bridging the Gap (pp. 189–204). Stanford, California: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chun, L. 2002. A Cognitive Approach to Up/Down Metaphors in English and Shang/Xia Metaphors in Chinese. In B. Altenberg & S. Granger (ed.), Lexis in Contrast: Corpus-based Approaches (pp. 151–174). Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, H.H. 1973. Space, Time, Semantics, and the Child. In T.E. Moore (ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language (pp. 27–63). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de la Fuente, J. et al. 2014. When you Think about it, your Past is in Front of you: how Culture Shapes Spatial Conceptions of Time. Psychological Science 25, 1682–1690. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Jorio, A. 2000. Gesture in Naples and Gesture in Classical Antiquity (trans. Adam Kendon). Bloomington, IA: Indiana University Press. First published (1832).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duffy, S.E. et al. 2014. Moving through Time: the Role of Personality in Three Real-life Contexts. Cognitive Science. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eikmeier, V. et al. 2013. Dimensional Overlap between Time and Space. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 20, 1120–1125. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fedden, S., & Boroditsky, L. 2012. Spatialization of Time in Main. Frontiers in Psychology 3, 485. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuhrman, O. et al. 2011. How Linguistic and Cultural Forces Shape Conceptions of Time: English and Mandarin Time in 3D. Cognitive Science 35(7), 1305–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuhrman, O., & Boroditsky, L. 2010. Cross-Cultural Differences in Mental Representations of Time: Evidence From an Implicit Nonlinguistic Task. Cognitive Science 34, 1430–1451. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gaby, A. 2012. The Thaayorre Think of Time Like they Talk of Space. Frontiers in Psychology 3, 300. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S. 2003. Hearing Gesture: How our Hands Help us Think. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gu, Y. et al. 2013. What can Chinese Speakers’ Temporal Gestures Reveal about their Thinking about Time? In Online Proceedings of TiGeR 2013: The Combined Meeting of the 10th International Gesture Workshop (GW) and the 3rd Gesture and Speech in Interaction (GESPIN) Conference .
Hartmann, M., & Mast, F.W. 2012. Moving along the Mental Time Line Influences the Processing of Future Related Words. Consciousness and Cognition 21, 1558–1562. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koch, S.C. et al. 2011. Up and Down, Front and Back: Movement and Meaning in the Vertical and Sagittal Axes. Social Psychology 42, 214–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kranjec, A., & McDonough, L. 2011. The Implicit and Explicit Embodiment of Time. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 735–748. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors we Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, S.C., & Majid, A. 2013. The Island of Time: Yélî Dnye, the Language of Rossel Island. Frontiers in Psychology 4, 61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Le Guen, O., & Balam, L.I.P. 2013. No Metaphorical Timeline in Gesture and Cognition Among Yucatec Mayas. Frontiers in Psychology 3, 1–15.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGlone, M.S., & Harding, J.L. 1998. Back (or Forward?) to the Future: The Role of Perspective in Temporal Language Comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24, 1211–1223. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNeill, D. 1992. Hand and Mind: what Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McTaggart, J. 1908. The unreality of time. Mind 17, 457–474. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miles, L.K. et al. 2010. Moving through time, Psychological Science 21, 222–223. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. The Meandering Mind: Vection and Mental Time Travel. PLoS One 5, e10825. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011. Can a Mind have Two Time Lines? Exploring Space-time Mapping in Mandarin and English Speakers. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 18, 598–604. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moore, K.E. 2006. Space-to-time Mappings and Temporal Concepts. Cognitive Linguistics 17, 199–244. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Ego-perspective and Field-based Frames of Reference: Temporal Meanings of FRONT in Japanese, Wolof, and Aymara. Journal of Pragmatics 43, 759–776. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murphy, G.L. 1996. On Metaphoric Representation. Cognition 60, 173–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nisbett, R.E., & Wilson, T.D. 1977. Telling more than we can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes. Psychological Review 84, 231–259. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Núñez, R.E., & Sweetser, E. 2006. With the Future Behind Them: Convergent Evidence From Aymara Language and Gesture in the Crosslinguistic Comparison of Spatial Construals of Time. Cognitive Science 30, 401–450. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Núñez, R.E. et al. 2006. Time after Time: The Psychological Reality of the Ego- and Time-reference-point Distinction in Metaphorical Construals of Time. Metaphor and Symbol 21, 133–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Núñez, R. et al. 2012. Contours of Time: Topographic Construals of Past, Present, and Future in the Yupno Valley of Papua New Guinea. Cognition 124, 25–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Núñez, R., & Cooperrider, K. 2013. The Tangle of Space and Time in Human Cognition. Trends in Cognitive Science 17, 220–229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ouellet, M. et al. 2010. Is the Future the Right Time? Experimental Psychology 57, 308–314. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Santiago, J. et al. 2007. Time (also) Flies from Left to Right. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14, 512–516. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sell, A.J., & Kashak, M.P. 2011. Processing Time Shifts Affects the Execution of Motor Responses. Brain and Language 117, 39–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shinohara, K., & Pardeshi, P. 2011. The more in Front, the Later: The Role of Positional Terms in Time Metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics 43, 749–758. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sullivan, J.L., & Barth, H.C. 2012. Active (not passive) spatial imagery primes temporal judgments. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 65, 1101–1109. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tenbrink, T. 2011. Reference Frames of Space and Time in Language. Journal of Pragmatics 43, 704–722. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torralbo, A. et al. 2006. Flexible Projection of Time onto Spatial Frames of Reference. Cognitive Science 30, 747–757. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, E.C. 1978. On the Expression of Spatio-Temporal Relations in Language. Universals of Human Language. Volume 3: Word Structure, 369–400.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tversky, B., Kugelmass, S., & Winter, A. 1991. Cross-cultural and Developmental Trends in Graphic Productions. Cognitive Psychology 23, 515–557. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ulrich, R., & Maienborn, C. 2010. Left–right Coding of Past and Future in Language: the Mental Timeline During Sentence Processing. Cognition 117, 126–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ulrich, R. et al. 2012. With the Past Behind and the Future Ahead: Back-to-front Representation of Past and Future Sentences. Memory and Cognition 40, 483–495. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walker, E.J., Bergen, B.K., & Núñez, R. 2014. Disentangling Spatial Metaphors for Time Using Non-spatial Responses and Auditory Stimuli. Metaphor & Symbol, 29(4), 316–327. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walker, E.J. et al. 2013. Later Events Lie Behind Her, but not behind you: Compatibility Effects for Temporal Sequences along the Sagittal Axis Depend on Perspective. In M. Knauff, et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 3729–3734). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weger, U., & Pratt, J. 2008. Time Flies Like an Arrow: Space Time Compatibility Effects Suggest the Use of a Mental Time-line. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 426–430. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Yang, Wenxing, Jiaqi Dong, Ruidan Bi, Jian Gu & Xueqin Feng
2022. Cross-cultural differences in mental representations of diagonal time lines. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20:2 ► pp. 357 ff. DOI logo
Li, Heng
2017. Time on hands. Gesture 16:3 ► pp. 396 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue