Cover not available

In:Conceptualizations of Time
Edited by Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk
[Human Cognitive Processing 52] 2016
► pp. 27–42

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Situating Events in Language

Published online: 14 June 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.52.02pus
It is currently acknowledged that events constitute an integral part of the metaphysics and semantic machinery for interpreting natural language utterances (Davidson 1967, 1980). Most research into event semantics since Davidson and Parsons (Parsons 1990) has focused on questions relating to either aspectual classifications (Akstionsarten) or temporal semantics. One area that has received far less attention is the issue of event localization, that is, the problem of spatially situating events. In this paper, I discuss the procedures for identifying where events, as expressed in natural language, are located in space. Aspects of the semantics of event localization have been recently proposed, including the notion of the “shape” of a movement (Eschenbach et al. 1999; Zwarts 2006), as well as treating movement verbs as “path creation” predicates (Pustejovsky and Moszkowicz 2011). In this paper, I build on these and some additional observations to outline a more general semantics of event localization. I then outline a procedure that extends the path metaphor used for motion predicates, distinguishing between the event locus and the spatial aspect of an event. In the process, I discuss how localization is supervenient upon the participants in the events, but not as straightforwardly as one might expect.
References (38)
References
Bennett, B., & Galton, A. 2004. A Unifying Semantics for Time and Events. Artificial Intelligence 153, 13–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chierchia, G. 1988. Structured Meanings, Thematic Roles, and Control. Properties, Types, and Meaning 2, 131–166.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohn, A.G., & Renz, J. 2001. Qualitative Spatial Representation and Reasoning. An Overview Fundamenta Informaticae 46, 1–2.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1967. The Logical Form of Action Sentences. Essays on Actions and Events 5, 105–148.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1980. Intending. Essays on Actions and Events, 83–102.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Egenhofer, M., & Mark, D. 1995. Modeling Conceptual Neighborhoods of Topological Line-region Relations. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 9(5), 555–565. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eschenbach, C. et al. 1999. Representing Simple Trajectories as Oriented Curves. In FLAIRS-99, Proceedings of the 12th International Florida AI Research Society Conference , (pp. 431–436).
Galton, A. 2000. Qualitative Spatial Change. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayes, P.J. 1989. Naive Physics I: Ontology for Liquids. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Higginbotham, J. 1983. The Logic of Perceptual Reports: An Extensional Alternative to Situation Semantics. The Journal of Philosophy, 100–127.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R.S. 1992. Semantic Structures, vol. 18. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1983. Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1991. Parts and Boundaries. Cognition 41(1), 9–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kamp, J.A.W. 1968. Tense Logic and the Theory of Linear Order. PhD thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1966. On the Psycho-physical Identity Theory. American Philosophical Quarterly 3(3), 227–235.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1969. Events and Their Descriptions: Some Considerations. Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel, 198–215. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1973. Causation, Nomic Subsumption, and the Concept of Event. The Journal of Philosophy 70, 217–236. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1976. Events as Property Exemplifications. Action Theory, 159–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mani, I., & Pustejovsky, J. 2012. Interpreting Motion: Grounded Representations for Spatial Language. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarthy, J., & Hayes, P. 1968. Some Philosophical Problems From the Standpoint of Artificial Intelligence. Stanford University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montague, R. 1973. The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English. Approaches to Natural Language 49, 221–242. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muller, P.A. 1998. Qualitative Theory of Motion Based on Spatio-temporal Primitives. In A.G. Cohn, L. Schubert, & S.C. Shapiro (eds.), KR’98: Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (pp. 131–141). San Francisco, California: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parsons, T. 1990. Events in the Semantics of English. A Study in Subatomic Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prior, A. 1957. Time and Modality. My Present Modification of the Position There Stated Owes Much to PT Geach’s Criticism in the Cambridge Review, 543.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, J., & Jezek, E. 2011. Scale Shifting and Compositionality. In Proceedings of Scalarity in Verb-Based Constructions . Germany: Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf.
. 2013. Manuscript, Brandeis University and University of Pavia.
Pustejovsky, J., & Moszkowicz, J. 2011. The Qualitative Spatial Dynamics of Motion. The Journal of Spatial Cognition and Computation. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, J. 1995. The Generative Lexicon. Bradford Book. MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Randell, D. et al. 1992. A Spatial Logic Based on Regions and Connections. In M. Kaufmann (ed.), Proceedings of the 3rd Internation Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, (pp. 165–176). San Mateo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H. 1947. Symbolic Logic. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rescher, N., & Garson, J. 1968. Topological Logic. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 33(4), 537–548. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Russell, B. 1903. The Principles of Mathematics. WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. 1983. How Language Structures Space. In H. Pick & L. Acredolo (eds.), Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research, and Application. New York: Plenum Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Towards a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tenbrink, T. 2011. Reference Frames of Space and Time in Language. Journal of Pragmatics 43(3), 704–722. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vendler, Z. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwarts, J. 2005. Prepositional Aspect and the Algebra of Paths. Linguistics and Philosophy 28(6), 739–779. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Event Shape: Paths in the Semantics of Verbs. Ms., Radboud University Nijmegen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Varzi, Achille C. & Claudio Calosi
2025. Parts and Participants. Journal of Philosophical Logic DOI logo
Liefke, Kristina
2020. Saving Hamlet Ellipsis. In Logic and Algorithms in Computational Linguistics 2018 (LACompLing2018) [Studies in Computational Intelligence, 860], ► pp. 17 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue