Cover not available

In:Multilingual Cognition and Language Use: Processing and typological perspectives
Edited by Luna Filipović and Martin Pütz
[Human Cognitive Processing 44] 2014
► pp. 121–150

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

HERE, NEAR, FAR

Spatial conceptualisation and cognition in a cross-linguistic perspective (English vs. Russian)

Published online: 10 June 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.44.05gla
This chapter explores variation and similarities in the conceptualisation of space in Russian and English on the basis of selected terms of ‘location’ and ‘proximity/distance’. It adopts the Natural Semantic Metalanguage (NSM) approach, which identifies eight semantic universals of space, three of which, HERE, NEAR, FAR, were tested for their realisation in both languages. A semantic analysis of terms denoting ‘here’, ‘near’, ‘not far’, and ‘far’ confirms the presence of the three universal primes in English and Russian, though they differ in how they conceptually carve up the notion of space. The study has implications for research into bilingualism and language acquisition and demonstrates that the NSM formulae can be used experimentally to test spatial conceptualisation and cognition cross-linguistically.
References (32)
Apresjan, Jurij. 1995. Integral’noe opisanie jazyka i sistemnaja leksikografija [An integrated linguistic description and systematic lexicography] . Vol. 2. Moskva: Škola “Jazyki russkoj kul’tury”?.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blake Huer, Mary. 2000. Examining perception of graphic symbols across cultures: Preliminary study of the impact of culture/ethnicity. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 16 (3): 180–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boguslavskaja, Olga. 2004. Blizko, nedaleko, poblizosti, nepodaleku, nevdaleke, vblizi. In ?J. Apresjan, ed., Novyj ob’’jasnitel’nyj slovar’ sinonimov russkogo jazyka [The New Explanatory Dictionary of Russian Synonyms], 37–44. Moskva–Wien: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury–Wiener Slawistischer Almanach.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa & Soonja Choi. 2003. Space under construction: Language-specific ­spatial categorization in first language acquisition. In D. Gentner, & S. Goldin-Meadow, eds., Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought , 387–427. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bromhead, Helen. 2011a. The bush in Australian English. Australian Journal of Linguistics 31: 445–471. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011b. Ethnogeographical categories in English and Pitjantjatjara/Yankunytjatjara. Language Sciences 33 (1): 58–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collins English Dictionary. 1998. Glasgow: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collins WordbanksOnline. [URL]
Filipovi?, Luna & Kasia Jaszczolt, eds. 2012. Space and Time in Languages and Cultures: Language, culture and cognition . Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gladkova, Anna. 2010. Russkaja kul’turnaja semantika: ?mocii, cennosti, žiznennye ustanovki . [Russian cultural semantics: emotions, values, attitudes.] Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff. 2011. Semantic Analysis: A Practical Introduction . 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff & Anna Wierzbicka, eds. 2002. Meaning and Universal Grammar: Theory and Empirical Findings . Vols. 1 & 2. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1995. Semantics and Cognition . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Foundations of Language . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. On conceptual semantics. Intercultural Pragmatics 3 (3): 353–358. ? Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Conceptual semantics and natural semantic metalanguage theory have different goals. Intercultural Pragmatics 4 (3): 411–418. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakovleva, Elena. 1994. Fragmenty russkoj jazykovoj kartiny mira (modeli prostranstva, vremeni i vosprijatija) [Fragments of the Russian language world view (models of space, time, and perception)]. Moscow: Gnozis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jarvis, Scott & Aneta Pavlenko. 2007. Crosslinguistic Influence in Language and Cognition . ­London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 2012. Linguistic manifestations of the space-time (dis)analogy. In L. Filipovi? & K. Jaszczolt, eds., Space and Time in Languages and Cultures: Language, culture and cognition , 191–215. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leibniz, G.?W???.1987[1678]. The analysis of languages. In M. Dascal, ed., Leibniz, Language, Signs and Thought: A collection of essays , 161–165. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen. 2003. Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lucy, John. 1994. The role of semantic value in lexical comparison: motion and position roots in Yucatec Maya. Linguistics 32: 623–656. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maljar, Tatiana & Olga Seliverstova. 1998. Prostranstvenno-distancionnye predlogi i nare?ija v rus­skom i anglijskom jazykax . [Prepositions and adverbs of space and distance in Russian and English.]München: Verlag Otto Sagner.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Majid, Asifa, Bowerman, Melissa, Kita, Sotaro, Haun, Daniel & Levinson, Stephen. 2004. Can language restructure cognition? The case for space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (3): 108–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
PROIP(1956) – Pravila russkoj orforgrafii i punktuacii [Rules of Russian orthography and punctuation]. Moscow: Uchpedgiz. (Available from [URL])Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pütz, Martin & René Dirven, eds. 1996. The Construal of Space in Language and Thought . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Russian National Corpus[URL]
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1988. The Semantics of Grammar . Amsterdam & Philadelphia: ­Benjamins. ? Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. Semantics: Primes and Universals . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007a. Theory and empirical findings: A response to Jackendoff. Intercultural Pragmatics 4 (3): 399–409.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007b. NSM Semantics vs. conceptual semantics: Goals and standards ?(A response to Jackendoff). Intercultural Pragmatics 4 (4): 521–530.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wong, Jock, Goddard, Cliff & Anna Wierzbicka. Forthcoming. “Walking” and “running” in English and German: The cross-linguistic semantics of human locomotion.
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue