In:Variation and Change in the Encoding of Motion Events
Edited by Juliana Goschler and Anatol Stefanowitsch
[Human Cognitive Processing 41] 2013
► pp. 115–132
Motion events in Turkish-German contact varieties
Published online: 14 November 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.41.05gos
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.41.05gos
It is generally assumed that the typological characteristics of a language regarding the encoding of motion events have an influence on the usage preferences of native speakers of this language. These preferences could also be reflected in a second language with different typological characteristics. This chapter deals with the question of how motion events are encoded in the L2 German by native speakers of Turkish and how they differ in their preferences from monolingual speakers of German. I show that there are subtle differences between varieties in the encoding of motion events. However, these differences can be described more appropriately in terms of specific preferred and avoided construction types and differing semantic complexity than in the satellite- vs. verb-framed distinction.
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Wiesinger, Evelyn
2025. Language contact and creolization. In Constructions in Contact 3 [Constructional Approaches to Language, 40], ► pp. 111 ff.
Goschler, Juliana, Christoph Schroeder & Till Woerfel
2020. Convergence in the encoding of motion events in heritage Turkish in Germany. In Studies in Turkish as a heritage language [Studies in Bilingualism, 60], ► pp. 87 ff.
Stocker, Ladina & Raphael Berthele
Torres-Martínez, Sergio
Georgakopoulos, Thanasis, Holden Härtl & Athina Sioupi
BERTHELE, RAPHAEL & LADINA STOCKER
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
