The Potentiality for Actuality Metonymy in English and Hungarian

Panther, Klaus-Uwe

doi:10.1075/hcp.4.19pan

In:Metonymy in Language and Thought
Edited by Klaus-Uwe Panther and Günter Radden
[Human Cognitive Processing 4] 1999
► pp. 333–358

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download Book PDF

The Potentiality for Actuality Metonymy in English and Hungarian

Klaus-Uwe Panther

Published online: 15 September 1999

https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.4.19pan

Cited by (55)

Cited by 55 other publications

Order by:

Sun, Yi

2025. Metonymy. In A Multidimensional and Cross-spherical Study of Cognitive Metaphorology [Peking University Linguistics Research, 11], ► pp. 293 ff.

Brdar, Mario, Rita Brdar-Szabó & Daler Zayniev

2024. Metonymic layers in proverbs. In Proverbs within Cognitive Linguistics [Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts, 16], ► pp. 40 ff.

Kochman-Haładyj, Bożena

2024. A cognitive contrast of Polish and English proverbs with dog components. Lege artis. Language yesterday, today, tomorrow ► pp. 35 ff.

Kochman-Haładyj, Bożena

2024. Metonimiczne operacje w przysłowiach z nazwami miejsc. Słowo. Studia językoznawcze 15 ► pp. 101 ff.

Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José

2024. Metaphor as a resemblance phenomenon. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 11:1 ► pp. 8 ff.

Tóth, Máté

2024. A case for metonymic synesthesia. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 22:1 ► pp. 70 ff.

Antloga, Špela

2023. Identifikacija metafore in metonimije v jezikovnih korpusih. Slovenščina 2.0: empirical applied and interdisciplinary research 11:1 ► pp. 91 ff.

DESAGULIER, GUILLAUME & PHILIPPE MONNERET

2023. Cognitive Linguistics and a Usage‐Based Approach to the Study of Semantics and Pragmatics. In The Handbook of Usage‐Based Linguistics, ► pp. 31 ff.

Kochman-Haładyj, Bożena & Robert Kiełtyka

2023. Paradigm Shift in the Representation of Women in Anglo-American Paremiology – A Cognitive Semantics Perspective. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 68:1 ► pp. 41 ff.

ŞEHİTOĞLU, Muammer

2023. Yabancılara Türkçe Öğretiminde Dinleme Eğitiminde Kullanılan Kitapçık Metinlerinde Çok Anlamlılık: Yedi İklim B1-B2. Korkut Ata Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi :11 ► pp. 837 ff.

Brdar, Mario, Rita Brdar-Szabó & Tanja Gradečak

2022. Rosie the Riveter of the COVID time. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20:1 ► pp. 258 ff.

LECLERCQ, BENOÎT & ILSE DEPRAETERE

2022. Making meaning withbe able to: modality and actualisation. English Language and Linguistics 26:1 ► pp. 27 ff.

孙, 姣姣

2022. A New Interpretation of the Phenomenon of Syntactic-Semantic Mismatches in Chinese. Modern Linguistics 10:01 ► pp. 153 ff.

Brdar-Szabó, Rita & Mario Brdar

2021. Metonymic indeterminacy and metalepsis. In Figurative Language - Intersubjectivity and Usage [Figurative Thought and Language, 11], ► pp. 175 ff.

Chang, Miao-Hsia & Ún-giân Iûnn

2021. A corpus-based study of directives in Taiwanese Southern Min. Concentric. Studies in Linguistics 47:2 ► pp. 300 ff.

Guerrero Medina, Pilar

2020. Meaning construction and motivation in the English benefactive double object construction. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18:1 ► pp. 94 ff.

Matusz, Łukasz

2020. I will see it done: Metonymic extensions of the verb see in English. Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies :31(4) ► pp. 88 ff.

DeCoursey, Christina A. & Aliaa N. Hamad

2019. Emotions across the essay: What second-language writers feel across four weeks’ writing a research essay. English Studies at NBU 5:1 ► pp. 114 ff.

Komatsubara, Tetsuta

2019. Cognitive principles underlying predicational metonymy. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 6:2 ► pp. 247 ff.

Law, James

2019. Diachronic frame analysis. Constructions and Frames 11:1 ► pp. 43 ff.

Law, James

2022. Metonymy and argument alternations in French communication frames. Cognitive Linguistics 33:2 ► pp. 387 ff.

Peng, Yi

2019. The Event-Domain Cognitive Model perspective on terminology: A case study of atmospheric environment terms. Lexicography 6:1 ► pp. 43 ff.

Szczyrbak, Magdalena

2019. But, you see, the problem is …Perception verbs in courtroom talk: Focus onyou see. Topics in Linguistics 20:1 ► pp. 24 ff.

Athanasiadou, Angeliki

2017. Chapter 6. If-clauses and their figurative basis. In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56], ► pp. 152 ff.

Brdar, Mario & Rita Brdar-Szabó

2017. On constructional blocking of metonymies. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15:1 ► pp. 183 ff.

Brdar, Mario & Rita Brdar-Szabó

2017. Chapter 5. How metonymy and grammar interact. In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56], ► pp. 126 ff.

Brdar, Mario & Rita Brdar-Szabó

2025. Metonymy typologies revisited. In What makes a Figure [Figurative Thought and Language, 19], ► pp. 160 ff.

Paszenda, Joanna

2017. Motivation behind the extended senses of the Polish ditransitive construction. In Constructing families of constructions [Human Cognitive Processing, 58], ► pp. 241 ff.

Panther, Klaus-Uwe

2016. How to encode and infer linguistic actions. Chinese Semiotic Studies 12:2 ► pp. 177 ff.

Peña Cervel, María Sandra

2016. Argument structure and implicational constructions at the crossroads. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14:2 ► pp. 474 ff.

Zeng, Guocai

2016. A Cognitive Approach to the Event Structures of Wh-dialogic Constructions. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 34:4 ► pp. 311 ff.

Zhang, Weiwei, Dirk Speelman & Dirk Geeraerts

2015. Cross-linguistic variation in metonymies for PERSON. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:1 ► pp. 220 ff.

Ziegeler, Debra

2015. Calamities and Counterfactuals: A Historical View of Polarity Reversal. Anglophonia 19

Ziegeler, Debra

2016. Intersubjectivity and the diachronic development of counterfactualalmost. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Cifuentes-Férez, Paula

2014. A closer look at Paths of vision, Manner of vision and their translation from English into Spanish. Languages in Contrast 14:2 ► pp. 214 ff.

Li, Shuguang & Klaus-Uwe Panther

2014. ‘Author (date)’ constructions in academic discourse. English Text Construction 7:2 ► pp. 215 ff.

Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg

2014. Metonymy and the way we speak. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 27:1 ► pp. 168 ff.

Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg

2017. Chapter 1. Exploitingwh-questions for expressive purposes. In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56], ► pp. 18 ff.

Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg

2017. The role of inferencing in the interpretation of two expressive speech act constructions. In Constructing families of constructions [Human Cognitive Processing, 58], ► pp. 109 ff.

Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg

2018. What kind of reasoning mode is metonymy?. In Conceptual metonymy [Human Cognitive Processing, 60], ► pp. 121 ff.

Guarddon-Anelo, María del Carmen

2011. The Role of Metonymy and Metaphor in Grammaticalization: The Expression of Aspect. Australian Journal of Linguistics 31:2 ► pp. 211 ff.

Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José & Lorena Pérez Hernández

2011. The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor: Myths, Developments and Challenges. Metaphor and Symbol 26:3 ► pp. 161 ff.

Velasco-Sacristán, Marisol

2010. Metonymic grounding of ideological metaphors: Evidence from advertising gender metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics 42:1 ► pp. 64 ff.

Witczak-Plisiecka, Iwona & Maciej Witek

2009. The many faces of speech act theory — editorial to special issue on speech actions. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 5:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Baicchi, Annalisa

2007. Review of Günter, Köpcke, Berg & Siemund (2007): Aspects of Meaning Construction. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 5 ► pp. 307 ff.

Baicchi, Annalisa

2015. Conceptual metaphor in the complex dynamics of illocutionary meaning. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:1 ► pp. 106 ff.

Baicchi, Annalisa

2017. Chapter 3. How to do things with metonymy in discourse. In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56], ► pp. 76 ff.

Kosecki, Krzysztof

2007. On Multiple Metonymies within Indirect Speech Acts . Research in Language 5 ► pp. 213 ff.

Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Günter Radden

2005. Metonymy. In Handbook of Pragmatics, ► pp. 1 ff.

Paradis, Carita

2004. Where Does Metonymy Stop? Senses, Facets, and Active Zones. Metaphor and Symbol 19:4 ► pp. 245 ff.

Fisher, Harwood

2003. Metonymy as concept: A metaphor for rhetoric, not for thought. Semiotica 2003:147

[no author supplied]

2007. Book reviews. Intercultural Pragmatics 4:3

[no author supplied]

2019. Reference point and case [Human Cognitive Processing, 68],

[no author supplied]

2022. Figuring out Figuration [Figurative Thought and Language, 14],

[no author supplied]

2022. Introduction to Cognitive Pragmatics [Cognitive Linguistics in Practice, 4],

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.